There will be some, no doubt, on the far right leaning side of the spectrum who say that the Supreme Court of the United States did the world a service by squashing the opportunity for televising of the Prop 8 trial currently underway in San Francisco.
While I certainly appreciate that everyone is due their opinion, in this case, I must say those people are just wrong.
Whether on the right or left, the need for transparency and openness in matters of great public interest is critical, and this week SCOTUS had the opportunity to do a great service to the people of this nation - the chance not only to help educate and inform people about the way in which our judicial system works but also the chance to shed light on a matter of great importance to our country.
Today's New York Times ran an Op-Ed on this topic. While those same people who agree with (and even likely influnced) SCOTUS' decision would disagree (and I certainly admit to understanding the NY Time's more left-leaning filter), this Op-Ed speaks the truth.
SCOTUS has shown that while the George W. Bush Administration may no longer be camping in the White House, the remnants of that disaster - like the devastation of Katrina - remain and will plague us for some time to come.
That's why when my friend Alison Leigh Siegel told me about some of the plans she has for the holiday season I felt compelled to write about it.
Alison is an MFT with a background that blends both classically trained therapy techniques with somatic (body-oriented) practice. For the uninitiated who may not know what, precisely, somatic therapy is, here's the gist. For every stressful, anxiety-inducing experience we have in our lives, there is a directly correlated reaction in the body. At a simple level this could manifest as those ever-so-pesky knots so many people have in their neck and shoulders (mine tend to bunch up behind my right scapula). In more intense cases, "holding" stress can result in any number of physical ailments ranging from headaches and digestive issues to heart problems and more.
For the last 20 years Alison has been working with clients (more than 10,000 people across her various modalities of therapy) helping them relax, tune in to their core energy and focus in order to live the kind of life they know they want but may be having a hard time reaching.
By working from the core outward – meaning by getting people grounded in their bodies – Alison helps her clients achieve results in a truly holistic (in the full sense of whole) sense of truth, balance and authenticity. She accomplishes this through three basic methods:
1. Traditional psychotherapy: With solutions both for individuals and couples, Alison's counseling helps address an array of issues, not the least of which may be dealing with family over the holidays.
2. Coaching and skills training: Having worked with top executives from many industries, Alison also has developed a strong practice in basic coaching and skills training for professionals.
3. Bodywork/massage work: Though it would seem mostly a physical solution, Alison's work in this area also can achieve a powerful emotional release. It also just feels great.
What does this have to do with tech stuff?
Well, that's where the conversation with Alison about holiday season caught my truly geeky attention. She's using social media for her work. Of course massage/bodywork requires in person sessions, but for traditional therapy as well as her life/professional coaching, Alison is taking advantage of Skype as a way to deliver powerful therapy solutions for time-crunched individuals - a particularly valuable thing during the already saturated schedule time of holiday season. In the coming weeks she also will be developing her presence on Facebook and leveraging Twitter as well as YouTube to provide ongoing insights, commentary and resources for time-constrained individuals who need to find a way to take that first step towards more balanced emotional health.
When I told her that I wanted to write about this, Alison proffered another little tidbit - a discount! If you're reading this and you decide you want to try it out, or perhaps give a gift to someone who needs it, she's offering a 50 percent discount on her rates through January 1, 2010 to anyone who mentions my name when they book an hour-long session. (She emphasized that the discount isn't just for technology-based therapy, but for all her therapeutic services through the holidays.)
Here's my disclaimer - Alison and I are close, so you may think that biases my perspective. So don't take my word for it, you can read some of her reviews for yourself. She has testimonials on LinkedIn as well as some stellar reviews on Yelp.
Looking forward to 2010, Alison also is starting a school to expand her ability to educate people and support their therapeutic needs. At "The Feel Institute" Alison and a team of skilled professionals will be teaching an array of classes and workshops designed to guide people into deeper, more qualitative communications. Some of the initial classes planned include:
Emotional Skills Training: For social situations or at work (how to be better in relationships with co-workers, boss, etc)
Sensory Awareness: learning how to feel more with your senses (gives you greater sense of pleasure in everything you do)
Sexual Etiquette: So you think you know what to do? Think again. Learn some basics ... and then some.
Be a bitch without bitching: For women to learn the best way to seize their inner fierceness and still feel good about themselves. (I'm teaching the first class!)
Relationship Communications 101: Learning how to talk - and listen - with your partner
So don't let the stress of the holiday get to you. Do something for yourself (or someone you love), loosen up the calendar crush of holidays and roll into the New Year firing on all cylinders.
And if you're a friend of mine, yes a massage for Chrisma-Kwanz-ukah would be lovely, thank you. :)
Navigating that river in Egypt: From denial to understanding and maybe, just maybe, to acceptance
When I tell people about the coming out conversation I had with my mother 9 years ago, it never fails to elicit a chuckle, usually followed immediately by a somewhat embarrassed, "Oh, I'm so sorry, I don't mean to laugh."
Thing is, it was funny, and it went like this.
Picture a beachfront apartment building in Boca Raton, FL. My mother and I are lounging quietly in chairs on her terrace overlooking the crystalline blue waves lapping below. It had been almost a year since my father died, and I was growing increasingly pained with the lie of omission that was my failure to come out.
For some background, I was a late bloomer on the whole lesbian thing. My first experience with a woman was in the summer of 1996. The experience freaked me out sufficiently that I found myself dating men and women for a couple of years, trying to figure things out. By 1998 I was sure, and was ready to tell the family.
That's when my father got sick.
At that point the only thing that mattered was focusing on my father's well being. The family pulled together supporting my dad through the ups and downs of his treatment, celebrating the few bright moments of hope for recovery and ultimately dealing with the deterioration of his health and his death in March of 2000.
In any case, in late 2000 I made a trip to Florida to see my mother. One of my objectives on this trip was to tell her I was gay.
We spent several days together - going to the beach, to the mall, to the movies. Every day I looked for an opening, an appropriate moment. Finally came the day we opted to just hang out at the apartment, enjoying the spectacular ocean vista my father had loved so much.
It had been an hour or so of relative silence, and I decided it was time. Taking a deep breath I began, "Mom, I have something to tell you, and it's hard for me to say because I know that it will upset you."
Before I could open my mouth to utter the next sentence, my mother interrupted, "What's the matter?! Are you sick?"
I replied, "No mom, what I..."
She interrupted again, "Did you lose your job?"
I replied again, "No mom, actually I..."
"Is it your apartment?" she interjected, "Do you have to move?"
And so it went for a few more exchanges. Me, trying to get a word in edgewise and she spewing out questions about my job, my apartment, my friends, my car, even my dog and cat.
Finally, this query, "Are you pregnant?"
At last, an opening! "Well ... no." I paused. "You see mom, in order for me to be accidentally pregnant, I'd have to be having sex with men."
I paused. Silence.
That's when I realized that I had my eyes squeezed shut waiting for her response. I opened them slowly, looked at her and saw that she was sitting still, staring blankly out across the ocean.
After what felt like an eternity she spoke, "Well, I don't think any less of you, but I don't think it's true. I don't believe you ... My goodness, that's a very large boat out there, isn't it?"
Yeah, kinda like that.
This almost comical capacity for denial wasn't altogether new to me. My family has never been much for confrontation. That said, I'd just delivered a rather solid piece of life-changing information and it was brushed off.
I chalked it up to the fact that it was probably somewhat overwhelming and figured I'd take another run at the subject another time. I did. I tried quite a few more times over the coming years, and each occasion was met with an increased level of dismissal. Even my attempts to talk about friends who were gay or events that I might attend, for NCLR or EQCA were brushed off and dismissed, often with a "that's nice" and a stark subject change.
So I gave up.
After a somewhat tense family visit in January 2007 I stopped visiting altogether.
I continued speaking to my mother. Phone calls, emails and the occasional Skype vidoe chat kept us in touch, but I had written off spending any physical time with her. It was just too painful.
I would not be the first person to come out whose family had rejected the idea of their being gay. I would not be the first person who chose to divorce themselves of those family ties in order to move forward and lead a productive life.
If only it were that easy. Of course, it isn't.
While I seemed to be fine, the truth was that this rift with my mother was nothing more than a briefly inactive fault line, and as I began increasing my activism for LGBT equal rights, the molten magma underneath began to bubble and the plates began to shift.
In early August 2009 I attempted to participate in Camp Courage/East LA. I say "attempted" because while I made my way to Camp and even got my badge and sat with my group, it was about half way into the first story telling exercise that I came unglued. We were talking about our reasons for being involved in the movement, and as I began talking about my desire to help people tell their truth, I realized that I was failing to tell my own.
Leaving Camp early I pulled the plug on most of my activism. I stopped writing about LGBT issues and stopped participating in activities. However, I was still determined to attend the National Equality March in October.
At least I was planning on it until my mother asked me to come visit.
Hearing her voice I realized that until I spoke with her and at least made one more attempt to get her to "see" me, I couldn't in good faith continue speaking out - and to me a march in Washington was the ultimate of that.
As my fellow activists were getting ready to head for DC, I angled my trajectory to Boca Raton. Thanks to some great counsel from a wonderful woman (a woman who I hope one day to introduce to my mother), I felt prepared, but still nervous. I thought about when I wanted to have the conversation, where to have it, how to start it - so many thoughts racing through my mind.
So imagine my surprise when, on my first morning in Florida while sitting half submerged alongside my mother in her pool, the words just came out of my mouth.
My mother had said something about how nice it was that I was visiting and that I should come more often.
Taking a deep breath, I began. "Mom, I would come more often, but there's a reason I don't come. It's not that I don't love you. It's that it's just too hard ... too painful ... I know you don't like that I'm gay. I know it's not what you want for me, but that's how it is. That's who I am. And when I try to speak with you about my activism or about anything in my life and you dismiss it, it feels as though you are dismissing me. And that hurts."
I could feel the tears welling up in my eyes, and so I paused. Before I began again, I heard my mother clear her throat, so I waited. Then she spoke. She spoke of the difficulty she had in seeing me as gay because I don't fit the images she has in her mind of a what a lesbian is "supposed to" look like. She spoke of her concern for my safety and wanting me to be safe. She spoke of many things, but it was what she said at the end that brought it all home: "Cathy, I love you and I just want you to be happy. That is all that matters."
She looked at me with tears in her eyes and gave me a big smile.
The other day I was walking in Alta Plaza Park and ran into a friend - a dog park friend with whom I've actually socialized in the real world ... even without dogs.
She and I were talking about something I'm experiencing with regards to relationships - the personal kind, the life partner kind.
Quite recently Josie had very serious surgery. After recovery - actually she wasn't even really fully back to speed yet - she found herself on a journey to Bhutan. On that trip she learned many things of their culture, including about love and relationships. So after listening to my story, Josie took a moment and smiled.
This is not, by the way, verbatim or intended to be her words. It's my approximation of the tale. So, while spoken in "her voice", I do not mean to represent these as what she said. With that disclaimer...
She said: In Bhutan, they do not have a word for I. It doesn't exist. Everything is viewed and experienced as an "us" or "we". Life is about the collective experience. As for love, that doesn't translate either. Of course they have the experience of it, but if it were translated into English, the word would be acceptance.
It makes perfect sense, really. After all, who are those we love except the people who know us for who we are (and vise versa) and yet they love us (and vise versa) anyway. When my parents were celebrating their 40th anniversary, I remember quite clearly having conversations with each of my parents asking them that logical question: "So ... what's the secret to a happy, long-lasting marriage?"
Perhaps not so strangely they replied with pretty much the same thing, just said from different views.
My father's take was to think about the other person and list the top 10 things about them that bother you, then forget about all but the very top one - and realize that's not going away either, it just may be the source for arguing on occasion.
My mother's take was a bit more philosophical. She said so long as two people's moral compass pointed to the same True North, you can figure the rest out.
Point is - people don't change. Behaviors can, of course, but who a person is, that's hard wired pretty early on.
I'll avoid any self-indulgent pontificating about the in's and out's of my personal journey in the last several weeks, but suffice to say that in reconnecting with someone very important from my past, I seem to have taken an accelerated crash course in personal growth.
As so often happens in these types of times, it also seems that the lessons and messages are being repeated over and over - and from almost every angle. So I suppose it should not surprise me that this morning, upon turning the page in a lovely book I have called Offerings I was greeted by this quote:
"The act of acceptance, of acknowledging that change is a natural part of our interaction with others, can play a vital role in our relationships. These transitional periods can become pivotal points when true love can begin to mature and flower. We are now in a position to truly begin to know the other. To see the other as a separate individual, with faults and weaknesses perhaps, but a human being like ourselves. It is only at this point that we can make a genuine commitment, a commitment to the growth of another human being - an act of true love. -- The 14th Dalai Lama
As the weekend wends its way forward, pointing my eyes towards tomorrow night's sunset and Kol Nidre*, the start of the most important day on the Jewish calendar, Yom Kippur, I find myself feeling a bit daunted by the challenges ahead, but exhilarated and inspired by the amazing people with whom I'm so blessed to be surrounded.
So to those with whom I've already crossed paths and those who may come to this note long after today's date, I hope in reading this that whatever personal challenges or choices are currently at your fore you find inspiration or perhaps even comfort in the reminder that you're not alone.
*Sadly the YouTube video for this link is disabled for embedding. It's a beautiful recording of Johnny Mathis singing the haunting Kol Nidre prayer. If you've never heard this service, and you haven't clicked on that link already, here it is again (to save you the scrolling ). It's not the typical cantorial chant with choir, but it is lovely.
Women speaking at conferences: Just because you can, doesn't mean you should
I've been thinking a lot lately about my time at TechTV.
In particular I've been thinking about the quandary we faced early on in finding super smart tech folks ... who could speak on camera.
Why the nostalgia? I'll refrain from belaboring the topic here, but in case you've missed any of the recent debates about women speaking at tech conferences, you can read this post ... this post ... or this one.
Now back to my TechTV reverie ... Keep in mind this was late 90's and just into the early 00's. All these super simple social media platforms that allowed anyone and everyone to work on their camera delivery and speaking, didn't exist. My job at TechTV was all about those people in front of the camera. It began with my handling both the Talent and Guest Booking departments.
Ever try to get a geek to speak English? Ever try to do that in front of a camera? It ain't easy. Generally it was either great TV people with no tech skills or superb tech people who ... well ... let's say their communication skills were rusty.
Then, once you got someone to a passable state in front of the lens, there was the other challenge - figuring out what kind of on-air work they could do. Because just as in the "non tech" world of broadcasting, there are some people who are perfectly suited to anchoring, others to talk show hosting, others to reporting, others to doing panel moderation, and so forth.
(For the record, thanks to lots of research, a bit of luck and some superb talent coaching, we ended up with a rock solid on air crew .)
So it goes with conference speaking. Some people are great at individual talks and keynotes, others are best on panels, some are superb moderating, others best when giving a how to/or workshop type talk. And at the end of the day, some folks just don't belong in public speaking situations.
To be clear, I am also a firm believer that just about anyone can be taught enough baseline technique to become a half way decent presenter. Some pretty remarkable things can be accomplished with the right kind of training (this is where I give a shameless plug for my own story-telling workshops that are designed to help address the common missing link for most folks - the ability to tell their own story) but that's not the point of this.
My point here is simple ... if you suck at something, work at getting better. If after doing all you can to improve, you still are just hobbling by, perhaps you should re-evaluate the specific angle you're taking.
Are you pushing yourself solely for keynotes? Perhaps you should consider being on a panel? Or, better, yet, perhaps you can put together a great panel of people and moderate it yourself? How about workshop or how-to sessions?
Best of all - try them all ... You'll find what works. You'll find what doesn't. If you're lucky you'll have many different types of formats in which you are or become comfortable and can then continue to polish and grow.
Perhaps not quite as remarkable as the full moon that rose earlier this week, but pretty damn breathtaking. After the thick and stormy skies parted there he was - the perpetually surprised Man in the Moon glancing down sideways from his waning recline ... as if from under an oversized hoodie.
Hmmm. Interesting thought, but for the purpose of this post not relevant, so moving on ...
I'm blessed with a pretty spectacular view from my apartment. So on nights like this, when the entire cityscape takes on the luminous cast of silver, I make a point of turning out all the lights, cozying my favorite chair right ... up ... to the eastern facing window, and basking in that glow.
I've been in this apartment for a long time and experienced quite a few of these mooncast scenes, but tonight it was different. Perhaps I never experienced such bright moonlight so close to a rain; and so never caught the reflection from the scattered collection of rainwater pools.
In a flash, that wide path of moonlight stretching across the rooftops below, became a glistening silver band across the dark Atlantic. The deep whoosh of cars, their rushing pattern set by the streetlights, began to echo with the rumbling hiss of waves crashing onto the shoreline just below the Boardwalk where I stood with my father.
I was about 10 years old. We had just come back from a long dinner at our favorite Atlantic City (NJ) restaurants, Doc's Oyster House. Often after a big meal, the family would go for a long walk on the Boardwalk. Sometimes we'd walk where the "action" was - the casinos, amusement piers, that sort of thing. Best part of that was that invariably it also meant a trip to Dairy Queen or, even better for some water ice.
But other times we'd head back towards our house, and "walk the Boards" there, which essentially meant a quiet, salt-air-scented stroll with nothing more than the occasional pool of streetlights and whatever moonlight you might get. As much as I love ice cream, this was always my preferred path.
And on night's like tonight, the view was breathtaking. And on a night like tonight we wouldn't have been out there alone. The Boardwalk would have been jammed with people - whether weekday or weeknight - reveling in the fresh air and the view.
When that ridiculously fat, full moon broke above the horizon this week, glowing so enormous and pregnant in the sky it almost seemed perched on the top of the Transamerica Pyramid - not a soul was looking up. In fact, since I was driving, I put the top down on the car, and at every red light I very obviously stared up several times just to see if anyone else would.
No one did.
As I was driving and unable to text, I made a frantic series of (hands-free, of course) phone calls to some friends - two of whom texted back soon thereafter with thanks for having pointed their glance upward.
It's a good thing to remember.
Just because you're focused diligently on your future, and just because you have to pay attention to what's in front of you, don't forget to look up.
Just caught a Tweet about this ever-so-cool site that allows you to create a mosaic of your Twitter followers and then print it on t-shirts, mugs, bags or business cards.
You also can snare the embed code and put it on your blog.
In addition to the questions below - and with thanks to Jo Hoenninger, acting President of Marriage Equality USA; and Jay Matthew of Erase the H8 in Fresno - I've also been given the raw list of questions that went unanswered during the No on 8 Executive Committee session at last month's Equality Summit in LA. It's an 11-page list that Jo is hoping to clean up, flesh out with a full complement of answers and ultimately post online. In the mean time, I'll be folding in as many of the questions as possible to the Thursday afternoon conversation.
***Some things to know about how things will go on Thursday***
1) CAPTURING THE CONVERSATION: I will be recording (video and audio) of the session. In addition, we will be doing a live video stream of the entire conversation. To access that live stream, which will start at 2:00pm Pacific time on Thursday, February 5, 2009, go to my profile page at Qik.com. The featured video on that page is the current or most recent stream. If you're seeing a video entitled "Final test" then we haven't started quite yet.
2) COMMENTING WITHIN THE CHAT: The live stream site includes a chat room. If you are viewing the stream you have the ability to type in questions. I will monitor that as best possible during the conversation to take any new questions that might arise.
3) COMMENTING BY TWITTER: Please mark any Tweets related to this discussion with #marriageequality. I will monitor the Tweet stream as best possible for any additional questions that arise.
4) WHEN IT'S DONE: When we finish the session I will embed the entire video here. You can feel free to repurpose.
With that, here are the questions that were submitted on this site, at Other Than That and as comments on Facebook.
Comments submitted at EqualityCamp.com
Not sure from whom, precisely, but comment links to the site for LA Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence:
1: To what degree do you suppose the current, long-standing disquiet is being fed by the perception that the people of EQCA (who, we were told, 'did their best') have resisted accountability for their best not being good enough? That is: had any of you come forward with a sincere, unqualified mea culpa immediately, taken your lumps (even if undeserved) might we have been willing to 'move forward' with EQCA?
2: What changes have been made to EQCA, to board membership or to policy? Given the current perception, (that EQCA has neither learned or changed) why should EQCA still be considered a viable organization?
Richard (aka Willingthrall) asks:
Do you think No-on-8 would have benefited from pointing out that the Netherlands has had same-sex marriages for some time with no ill effects on the social fabric. Or would the right-wingers have decided to nitpick something about Dutch society?
Comments submitted at OtherThanThat.com
Jennifer Rinkenberger - Central Valley Regional Director (co-) for Yes! On Equality (aka Progressive Mama Blogger) asks:
The No On 8 campaign made a deliberate and public decision to ignore the Central Valley. Taking David Binder's recent report at face value, and understanding that demographics of Valley voters closely resemble the movable 6-7% of the electorate. What plans do you have to reach out to the Central Valley LGBT community? Many activists wrongly attacked the African-American community in the wake of Prop 8's passage. Those attacks brought some long seated resentment between LGBT people of color and white LGBT people, issues that obviously need to be addressed, to the surface.
However, I am concerned that the guilt regarding the initial reactions attacking people of color is going to translate into a campaign strategy that continues to ignore the geographic majority of the state -- the Central Valley. The Prop 8 campaign was run on the premise that if the Coastal counties could be carried the rest of the state could be ignored. Is the new campaign going to be to focus on communities of color in the Coastal counties...so that the rest of the state can continue to be ignored?
What plans have you for paid staff and an office of operations in the Central Valley?
What plans have you for including members of the Valley on your Executive Committees and boards?
What steps have you taken to diversify the people who make decisions for your organizations, beyond ensuring that all ethnicities and sexual identities are represented?
The Binder report says that voters that are influenced by discussions with LGBT people were more likely to vote no on 8, whereas voters influenced by religion were more likely to vote yes. It seems to me that talking to people of faith, in the language of faith, is something we need to do as a major component of any future campaign. What plans does EQCA have to work with groups like the California Council of Churches, who have developed a curriculum for discussing same-sex marriage from the faith perspective? The Binder report also suggests that gay and lesbian people and families are not effective messengers for marriage equality, at least on t.v. -- which is where most people get their messaging.
One of the major criticisms of the No On 8 campaign was the lack of LGBT family presence. Assuming we take the Binder report at face value and cede that we are not our best spokespeople -- has there been any consideration to reaching out to a handful of straight allies/clergy to serve as spokespeople in future campaigns and PSA's in an offensive/preemptive ad campaign, so that we can frame the issue and debate instead of being so reactionary?
If the Supreme Court fails to overturn Prop 8 and Yes! On Equality succeeds in getting marriage equality back on the ballot in 2010, we're going to be running a campaign during a midterm election, a cycle that is far more likely to attract older, whiter, conservative voters, than younger ones.
What do you think the priorities of such a campaign should be? Focusing energy and resources on trying to draw out younger voters, or tailoring a message that chips away at the stranglehold that some religious communities have on their members and hoping that some of that message trickles down to youth and other democratic minorities?
Catalina Ruiz-Healy - San Francisco
I would like to know why the gamble was made on "there are more of us than them", which is my understanding of what the strategy was. You need to pick a strategy, and that's cool. And one makes the wrong call sometimes. But I would like to better understand what data they used, knowing that Obama was going to be on the ticket and how this would affect turnout.
Also, I feel like there was absolutely NO reach out to straight women, Latinas, or anyone else who could have helped bridge the "them" divide. Calls were made only to perceived "friendlies" and I understand having to focus, but there was no reason surrogates couldn't be sent to churches, CBOs and other places to at least help frame the issue and start a discussion at home.
Jason Scott – Marriage Equality USA/Gay Fresno - Fresno
Why were calls for ANY money or ANY staff to be sent to Fresno (or anywhere in the central valley for that matter) completely unanswered. We were told we should drive up to San Francisco or down to Los Angeles to help out with the "offical" campaign. Why were our super volunteers offered paid work in San Francisco and taken away from our area.
We were bombarded with emails to send money to the campaign, but why was no support coming back to us?
In the interest in moving past this, will the leadership here today agree that this will never happen again? Apologies were made for many mistakes, but never for this one. We'd like to move past it, but even after election day, Lorri Jean from the campaign stated that "Focusing on the areas with the most votes" was done and was done "rightfully so". (Quote taken at 42:42 minutes in the Prop 8 Town Hall audio.)
Mariva – San Francisco Bay Area
1. Many people with political organizing and campaign experience tried to help with the No on 8 campaign on an organizational and strategic level, and yet there was no avenue for them to have a dialog with you. Why didn't you take feedback and suggestions from the LGBT and/or political organizing community? Why did you rely solely on the "wisdom" of focus groups, which proved to be deeply flawed?
2. Why wasn't there an immediate effort to launch a competing initiative, one with a similar description to Prop. 8 (e.g., "Protect Marriage") but with the exact opposite language therein? This worked very effectively with Prop. 99 against Prop. 98 (the so-called "eminent domain"/repeal rent control initiative). This tactic -- one among many -- was an obvious tenet of California Initiative Strategy 101, but no one seemed to think of it. Why didn't the No on 8 campaign work with experts with this type of ballot initiative experience and savvy?
3. On November 4, 2008, there was a No on 8 campaign visibility effort, but absolutely no GOTV effort. GOTV is one of the most important parts of a campaign -- and it should be taken care of *before* committing any volunteers to campaign visibility. The turnout in San Francisco was appallingly low. Why didn't the No on 8 campaign have volunteers dragging voters out of their homes to get them to the polls within 96 hours of Election Day?
Deirdre Saoirse Moen
I just want to say: thanks to everyone working for equality for LGBTs. I don't have any questions, but just wanted to offer warm fuzzy support.
I'd also like to point out my husband's article that points out that there are even apparent straight couples affected by prop 8, and not to ignore them: Right now, they're probably very in the closet, and if they know, they're probably very hurt.
Heather
Our community didn't reach out very well to religious institutions and ethnicities among others, nor did we refute in any way many flat-out lies. What sorts of things can we do besides a vague "talk to people" to try and change this? (e.g. make materials about this to hand out for people to read, go door to door in our neighborhoods and talk with everyone, explain why allowing gay marriage doesn't infringe on rights, use science studies to show that being gay is not a "lifestyle choice", etc...)
Jere Keyes
With so much community focus on the shortcomings of the campaign, are there any decisions that you continue to stand behind even if they are unpopular with LGBT people? What things were absolutely done right and should be done again in future elections?
Lisa Lindsay
What was with not being trained to talk to actual people when going door-to-door? Was this because I'm in the Central Valley where there were no resources (i.e. no paid staff who might do training on how to do a face-to-face conversation) or did we really people doing the work of a postage stamp everywhere?
What research was done to indicate not showing the face of real gay people in a commercial was going I be what "wins"? What research was done to indicate where money/resources should be spent? What will be done differently? What are the mistakes that won't be repeated?
Do you have any (expletive deleted) idea how it feels to live in a town where their are signs opposing your marriage being handed out every Sunday, and then to have friends who want to show support for your side (so much so that they'll pay the $10) to the not even be able to find the one god damn office that has signs?
Sonnie
Looking backwards, I am one of the ones who was angry and frustrated with the campaign. The deliberate decision to exclude 18,000 real live same-sex couples who legally and joyfully married during the available window was hurtful. I believe there should have been a parade of these people, their friends and family members. It was no less than internalized homophobia disguised as "political strategy" to take this action. We cannot live in fear. We must demonstrate that our lives are all about love.
One thing I also must say: I attended the Equality Summit, starting the day angry; but as things continued, even though my anger continued, I have to give credit to the members of the No on 8 Executive Committee for their willingness to sit in front of a large group of frustrated and furious people in the way they did. We need to move forward.
Comments from Facebook
Marivi Lerdo de Tejada – San Francisco
I think it is important, no, critical, to understand what mistakes were made so we can move forward with the campaign. But I'm not sure conducting a witch hunt is helfpul. Silicon Valley is full of *very* successful people who had equally spectacular failures, precisely because you learn more from your failures than from your success. Can we focus on the strategic and tactical mistakes and use them to chart a better course instead of looking for scapegoats?
Michael Mullin
Voting No on 8 could have been a vote for the status quo/ no change... which in our world seems (often sadly) to be a pretty easy sell. Learning from loss makes sense. Finding blame within the gay marriage proponents world seems like a divisive energy drain. Infighting makes the left relatively effete. We could be identifying common denominators among fellow Obama supporters, lending our support and building energy with them for shared causes. Right now it feels like the larger conversation is still located in a Republican context despite the opportunity to shift reference points to a Democratic one. When manipulating policy through fear and ignorance becomes marginal then those players will be motivated to become part of the change. As we move into a new paradigm Prop 8 will look more and more outlandish and ultimately, naturally be overturned.
Katherine Keon
Not too original however a constant in my mind...how to effectively organize is a big one here...often reiterated as the down fall to the last go and spoken about as the key to the next round however how to do it better must be understood in relation to the issue. I think it is critical to discover / develop, and I think it is both, a method of organizing that is unique to the issue. i think that we can learn truck loads from the obama organizing drive and the successful technicalities to that process AND i think we need to think about the issue itself and the way in which it is held in society, how gays are held in society at this juncture in time and organize based on what is there.
--- Cathy
What would YOU ask: A Q&A Session with some of the No on 8 Exec. Committee
NOTE: In the interest of best aggregating all the input, comments on this post are now closed. The next post which will outline the bulk of the questions and themes people have proffered will be open for further discussion.
Actually the "starters" lay within the snarled set of issues - call them mistakes, errors, miscommunications, snafus, misfires it doesn't really matter - that led to the way in which this (not-such) comedy of errors played out. For the record, I fall somewhere just off center on this. I'm pissed at how things turned out. Who wouldn't be? (Well, except for those who won, of course.) There were many points along the way where I saw plenty of things not going the right way. There were points along the way where, through conversations with others who were more deeply engaged than I, it was clear that the campaign was in trouble.
Many people - both those who continue to speak out as well as others who at this point are silent in shades of disgust - want a public accounting by the No on 8 Executive Committee on what happened - accepting responsibility, identifying mistakes ... that sort of thing. There have been posts calling out the members (once they were identified), demanding apologies and clamoring for answers. The dissenting voices, whose deeply persistent murmur rose to a particularly explosive cadence during last months' EqualitySummit, call for a public forum.
While I do not disagree that such a thing *should* happen, I'm concerned that the reality of it is slim to none and that a lot of time may be wasted in trying to make it take place. As I understand it there are "a few" members of the EC who have already flat out refused doing such a public thing - whether a live forum or a public statement. (Personally, I'd like to know who those people are so that we can remove them from the process moving forward. Anyone who cannot take accountability has no business leading ... but that is an issue for another post...).
So, I've been trying to think of ways to at least begin to mitigate this deep anger while trying to stay productive and forward looking at the same time. Participation in Equality Summit and Courage Campaign's Camp Courage went a long way towards that end. In the time since then, I've witnessed an incredible array of coalition building, team efforts underway and a wonderful sense that this community may well pull itself together in a unified effort.
But people are still upset. So what to do about that?
With that, I have taken it upon myself to attempt something this coming Thursday, February 5.
At 2:00pm Pacific this Thursday, 2/5 I am going to be sitting down with Kate Kendell, Geoff Kors and Tawal Panyacosit - three members of the No on 8 EC. It's *possible* that one or two other EC members might attend as well, but I have confirmed these three.
The entirety of this conversation will be on a live stream and I'll also have my various social network platforms open and fired up with the intention of giving as many people as wish to participate at least some open forum in which to talk with at least some of the EC members.
In the interest of trying to put at least a bit of structure around the questions (not to edit, but to manage what I'm hoping will be a lot of input!) I'm hoping to solicit as many questions as possible in the next 24 hours. My plan will then be to put those question up on a live poll and have people vote on those questions with the intention of asking as many of them as possible in the order that people have indicated is important to them ...
My intention here is really to try and foster some sort of facilitated dialogue that can be productive. I may fail, but I feel that I must try.
One person to whom I reached out already has said that short of a complete and public (e.g. an in person Town Hall type) hearing they have no interest in helping spread the word about this Thursday's discussion. If this is your perspective as well, I wholly appreciate and respect that.
If, however, you feel that having at least this virtual public gathering can help serve to forward the idea of gaining some more public closure (which was started at EqualitySummit), I would truly appreciate your help.
And doing so is very simple:
1) Please spread the word. Your assistance in forwarding the link to this can only mean more people have a chance to speak up.
2) Submit a comment here. The comments will close at 9:00am Pacific time on Wednesday, February 4. PLEASE MAKE SURE AND LEAVE ME A REAL EMAIL ADDRESS so that I can contact you for step 3.
3) I will aggregate the questions from here (as well as from the the EqualityCamp site and Facebook - where I've also posted this) and then will publish a public poll. That poll will be open from 9am pacific time on Wednesday 2/4 through 12:00pm Pacific time on Thursday, February 5.
I'll post a note and contact everyone who's submitted questions with a link to the live stream for Thursday and hope you'll not only forward that link liberally but also can take the time to participate.
Will this resolve the concern and angst in the community, that would be an awfully lofty goal. If that can be accomplished, great. That pragmatic voice in my head says that this is really only a start, but in taking a step, hopefully we can all begin to truly move forward.
EqualitySummit: Research Study from David Binder on Proposition 8 Campaign
Today's opening session is a collection of voices from the 2008 election cycle and the (now notorious) efforts executed (or not, as some say) for the No on 8 campaign.
But I'm a rather lousy live-blogger, so won't attempt to encapsulate the session now, rather I wanted to proffer a tidbit from one of the press releases they gave me ... It's about a research report from David Binder Research. He'll be speaking a bit later, and I'm hoping to snare a few minutes on video with him, but in advance of that here's a tidbit:
The headline reads: "Prop 8 Study Reveals Conversations with Friends, Family, Co-workers, Most Influential in Driving 'NO' vote."
Gosh there's a shocker.
You mean actually meeting and getting to know real people and hearing real stories may have impact in winning hearts and minds? Sorry if I sound a bit bitter, but isn't that precisely what any good effort towards social change endeavors to accomplish?
Okay, so how about this next tidbit that came in the sub-headline of the release:
"Study finds 73% of people who voted for Prop. 8 said nothing could've changed their vote."
This, also, doesn't really surprise me ... what surprised me is that the release buried a point that I think matters more... On the second page of the release, in the second to last paragraph is this:
"Only about 15% of yes on 8 voters could name something tangible that could cause them to change their mind and support same sex marriage, including:
- Call marriage by another name
- Ensure marriage for same-sex couples will not be taught in schools
- Ensure churches will not be forced to perform same sex marriages
- Approval, or lack of formal opposition, from churches or religious leaders"
This says two things to me:
1) It reconfirms my belief that while focusing efforts on changing those minds is a waste of energy, that does not mean we should not endeavor to engage with that community ... This is pretty much my take away after the ever-so-educational interaction with The Rev. Chauncey Killens at EqualityCamp.
2) There are points outlined above that may be worth at least considering, if for no other reason than at least understanding what kind of middle ground might be acceptable. I'm not suggesting we acquiesce, but I do believe that within our strength we need to avoid stridency and strive to find middle ground.
Sometimes it doesn't take many words: A Twitter-esque occasion
On Wednesday morning I hopped into the car with Truman and pointed my way southbound on US-101 headed for Los Angeles.
A couple of hours into the journey, I approached one of those signs heralding my impending entry to a town. The kelly green sign loomed large:
Chualar, CA
Population 1,440. Elevation 110' (above sea level).
Part of me feels as though that last sentence should be where I end this post, and perhaps it is. (By all means feel free to chime in and comment on that - and anything else for that matter .) The part of me compelled to continue (which of course is the part that oftentimes wins) has one point to make:
In recent weeks it has become abundantly clear I have quite a lot for which to be thankful. Some deeply irksome matters (largely personal in nature) rendered the tail end of '08 ... Well, let's just say the tail may have wagged the dog a few times. But as that proverbial calendar page flipped and I had to get used to writing a new last digit for the year in my journal, a remarkable shift has taken place. And one reason I've been able to muscle through this tectonic exercise, is social media - both the tools/platforms and the people who make and use them.
Okay so maybe that's more like two reasons. But you get the idea.
Glenn Close, personal space and a walk down Sutter Street
There was no handshake or "Nice to meet you Glenn, I'm Cathy," sort of exchange. But we did walk an entire city block and cross two intersections together; and if I were measuring my encounter with her by the terms of social networks and Web 2.0 technologies, she and I are practically best friends now.
Of course that's ridiculous, but the experience did make me rethink just what it means to balance personal space with being part of this always connected world in which we live.
The previous night I watched the season two premiere of Damages, the F/X series that Ms. Close kicked off last year. Her character, Patty Hewes, is a vicious litigator whose threadbare ethics seem wrapped around a deeply moral core. She may play dirty, but in the end it appears that all she really wants is justice. Or she's pathologically evil. You're never really sure, and that's part of the intrigue.
I love this show and have talked about this character often - and there she was. Well, there was the woman who plays the role that I enjoy so much. It felt a perfect opportunity to thank this wonderful actress for her work.
But I didn't.
In fact, I stood on the corner next to her and didn't say a word. Not then and not as we walked down the block. For the uninitiated, I'm not exactly the most shy retiring sort, so one might ask how it's possible that I could have walked the entire length of Union Square just about arm's length from one of my favorite actresses of all times and not speak to her?
Simple.
She didn't look like she wanted to talk with anyone. From the moment I noticed her, she had about as inward facing body language as you can imagine. She cast her eyes around a bit, but for the most part kept her gaze fixed slightly down and in front.
Even her physical stance seemed muted. When the light changed and we stepped from the curb, she did so gingerly and seemed to be moving in the manner of someone just off a physical injury of some sort – a stark contradiction to the powerful strides of Patty Hewes.
Whether her insular focus was due to not feeling well, having a bad day or perhaps just not having had her morning coffee was irrelevant. She just seemed like she didn't want to be interrupted. So I left her alone.
My pace was slightly faster so I reached the next intersection about 20 steps ahead. As I stood there a nattily dressed fellow in a splendid pair of boots walked up. I complimented his attire, we chatted a moment and as we finished, Ms. Close reached the corner standing next to me.
With the light about to change, I began to turn towards the intersection myself, and that's when it happened. Another passer-by caught sight of Ms. Close on the corner. And after uttering a squeal of delight this woman fairly leapt to the curbside next to Ms. Close, grabbed her arm and chortled, "Oh my GOD, I just LOVE your work. You are just DIVINE, and ..."
My glance shot immediately to Ms. Close to see her reaction and watched as her initial wide-eyed surprise (tinged with fear, I think) melted quickly into a most gracious countenance, albeit with a slightly frozen smile.
An eternity passed, the light changed and with a quick thank you, Ms. Close gently extricated her arm from the woman's grasp and stepped into Powell Street. Matching her stride, I found myself shoulder to shoulder (well, not quite, as she's quite a bit more petite than I had thought), crossing the street. Without turning to her directly, and keeping my voice in a low, modulated tone (appropriate for the close proximity with which we stood) I took a deep breath and spoke to her.
"Of course, I recognized you a block or so back, but you really seemed to be having a personal moment and I didn't want to interrupt."
I paused and watched for a reaction. Ms. Close did a double take and I found myself on the receiving end of a deeply genuine smile and the unmistakable blue sparkle from behind her sunglasses. I felt the door was still open, so I continued: "I've been a fan of your work for some time, and love so many of the characters you've played, but that Patty Hewes, she's just deliciously duplicitous. I adore her."
Then I grinned.
By this point we had reached the other side of Powell and Ms. Close had stopped next to me as I finished. She nodded at my description of the character, said thank you and met my grin. Then she gave my arm a squeeze, leveled a slightly more serious smile my way, paused and repeated: "Thank you." Then she walked into the Walgreens and I continued to Jeff's breakfast.
The whole thing took less than a couple of minutes to transpire, and yet it sat with me throughout the morning and into the afternoon. What was it about this that was niggling on my brain so much? And more to the point that you may be wondering right about now: What on earth does this have to do with technology?
Both good questions, and there's a common answer.
It used to be that famous people - whether actors, politicians, business people or any other ilk - were deemed more important if for no other reason than they had the ability to gain the attention of a large audience. The American culture still puts a great degree (too much if you ask me) of importance on fame, but the truth is that today's hyper-connectivity puts more and more people into a position more like that of Ms. Close than ever before.
We have truly Internet famous people who are in effect a collective MiniMe for real celebrities (think those whose Twitter followers lay in the tends of thousands). Out in the "real" world, these folks are relatively unknowns (most of them) but in our little echo chamber they are celebrities. And then thanks to social media, regular old folks like you and me are watched, or in geek vernacular "followed" every day. The number of people watching may be exponentially smaller for the average person, but the nature of that watching is no less intense.
In some cases the watchful eyes are familiar, but quite often those eyes belong to strangers ... strangers to whom we've granted an open door to our lives - or at least part of them. Suddenly there are people who feel (accurately or not) they know who you are, because they have constant access to "how" you are (or at least to what you're doing at any given moment).
This means that on some level each and every one of us can appreciate or understand that even in a world that's always connected, every person deserves an opportunity to unplug. And sometimes that opportunity doesn't come at a far-flung spa but walking down a moderately populated city street.
My lesson from this experience is that even though we may choose to splay much of our lives onto platforms where many people can see, hear and share with us, that does not - or at least should not - preclude the very basic social practices taught before you were judged by how many email addresses you have.
In as much as we stride forward using these technologies, embracing them and all the sticky, complex connectivity that result we cannot forget that in order to inhabit our own individual space, we need to be mindful of the fact that others need their space too.
EqualityCamp: Make a New Year's Resolution for Civil Rights
I was at the gym today, overcompensating for some holiday overindulgence, when I ran into a dear friend and fellow gym rat. As the two of us embarked on our hour of elliptical torture, I glanced over to see what she was reading.
It was a copy of The Advocate. And the cover, which I had seen before, screamed out: "Gay is the New Black."
A stark statement, perhaps, but as time has moved away from the November 4 election and the passage of Proposition 8, the bitter sadness and disappointment of loss has given rise to a powerful new wave of the civil rights movement.
It's being powered *heavily* by Web 2.0, and on January 3, 2009 we take another step down that digital path.
On that day, the inaugural outing of EqualityCamp takes place in San Francisco. It's a "BarCamp" style event that will bring together netroots, grassroots, and technologists to help coordinate efforts to repeal Prop 8 and support marriage equality. (Note that if you don't fit into one of those previous categories that *doesn't* mean you shouldn't come!)
Put even more simply - it's time to "Obamafy" the efforts for marriage equality.
There are myriad groups and individuals throwing their efforts into this challenge and EqualityCamp - being organized by myself, Tara Hunt, Heather Gold, Adina Levin, Hillary Hartley and supported in part by the Courage Campaign - will be a critical step in that process. Because it does precisely what was not done during the "No on 8" campaign - namely taking full advantage of the opportunities for grassroots organizing using technology.
The last six weeks have been rife with amazing efforts - like the nationwide Join the Impact rallies, which drew hundreds of thousands of people to the streets in cities across the entire nation on one day. (It merits mentioning that Amy Balliett, the 26-year-old woman in Seattle who was responsible almost single-handedly for galvanizing that day, will be at EqualityCamp!).
In short - so far so good. But there's much left to do, and the opportunities ahead are plentiful.
To give you an idea, here are a few themes and topics you'll find at EqualityCamp:
connecting "netroots" and traditional organizing
- using "Web 2.0" tools to support a grassroots movement
- taking effective practices from the Obama campaign and using them in - the movement for marriage equality
- how to best use digital video to share stories and build support
The logistics for the day are:
Date: January 3, 2009
Location: CitizenSpace, 425 2nd Street, Ste 300, San Francisco
Time: 10:00am - 6:00pm
If you cannot make it to San Francisco for January 3rd, visit EqualityCamp.com to learn how to make your own!
We are dedicated to making a people-powered marriage equality movement work from the bottom up. So please, if you are in town and are able, join us. And spread the word!! We are hoping to outgrow our space and already have larger back-up locations lined-up.
That's a problem I'd love to have ... so how about contributing to that problem for me!
As I sat typing these thoughts last Friday, whooshing along at a comfortable 521 mph while 37,000 feet over the Atlantic, Delia was settled in a few rows ahead alternating between quick naps and reading a book by Bruce Chatwin that she brought on board (along with at least one newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, I think) for the flight back to the US from Paris.
I know a little about her. I know she's 89 years old and originally from New York. I know she has several children (four), a passel of grandchildren (seven) and sprinkling of great grandchildren (three). But in the brief conversation we shared at the airport, and a more extended chat during which I knelt in the aisle by her seat, Delia shared many words of wisdom - some of which resonate still in my heart several days later.
Actually the words she uttered weren't hers. She was relating a story, and the words she shared were from someone she knew - Eleanor Roosevelt.
Yes, that Eleanor Roosevelt.
Delia was a young girl at the time. Her father was involved in government dealings, and so the phone would ring at her house with the President or First Lady on the line. (For the record I don't know precisely what her father did, we didn't get to that part.) This phrase, said to Delia by one of the most oft-quoted First Ladies in American history, went like this ...
"Hello dear, are you ready to serve?"
Are you ready to serve?
What a question.
It's not the clarion call of Kennedy's famous inaugural speech challenge, but can you imagine picking up the phone and hearing someone of the likes of Eleanor Roosevelt asking if you're ready to suit up and get involved? Can you imagine answering that query with anything less than a hearty YES!?
Even standing by the coffee machine in the airport lounge at Charles de Gaulle airport (which, btw, made superb espresso), a slight ripple tickled the follicles at the base of my neck. Because, I realized that I am, indeed, ready.
I've written before about my status as a newly hatched activist, and certainly have been more engaged politically in the last month than ever before in my life. But a steady drumbeat of lessons set a strong rhythm last week in Paris - a syncopated pattern expanding and expanding in my head, rife with the roll of timpani and rat-a-tat-tat of snare drum.
A document shepherded in part and signed by ... Eleanor Roosevelt.
Which brings me back to Delia.
She and her companion, Max, were in Paris to attend the Global Zero conference and as we stood musing on pain au chocolat and coffee, she fixed me with a crisp yet deeply warm, blue gaze and said in a voice tinged ever-so-slightly with the tones of New York:
"It's a mess - a real mess. (The world) is in big trouble, kid - big trouble; and we have to do something about it."
Are you ready to serve?
The more one reads the paper, watches television or dips into the flood-level rushing information waters of the Internet, it would seem that our situation already has passed the point of no return.
But it has not. And today, unlike any other time in our history, we - and by "we" I mean folks who don't necessarily flit in high-end Beltway circles, have the opportunity to the mountain tops of Davos or Sun Valley - actually can do something. We need not sit idly by, waiting for government officials or well-heeled philanthropists to set the course.
Are you ready to serve?
Of course it would be nice to be one of those who can dedicate their entire life to addressing the world's issues. But this isn't a luxury most people can afford, so here is my clarion call to you.
Pick an issue - any issue - something that matters to you. Whether it's providing clean water to tribal cultures in Africa, addressing political issues in war torn countries, or something more simple and local to you like the plight of local homeless or mentoring underserved children or even getting that pot hole filled on your street - get involved.
And by get involved, I don't mean open your wallet. Sure, any such cause likely needs money, and I'm sure they won't turn your checks away. But I'm talking about rolling up your sleeves because what they also need is help. Take the time, even if it's just a couple of hours a month, and do something - anything.
I feel as though I returned to the US prepared to ratchet things up a hefty notch or two.
First stop - marriage equality - and I'll ride that train as long as it takes to reach the final destination. And then, I'll check the schedules and pick the route for the next journey.
What about you?
Are you ready to serve?
Nothing by Chance: A Tale of Serendipity from LeWeb 2008
If you're one of those people who believe nothing happens by chance, then you should keep reading.
On Tuesday afternoon at LeWeb I was scheduled to interview one of my literary heroes, Paulo Coelho. To be more precise it wasn't going to be an interview so much as a free-form discussion in which we would touch on a series of topics and allow others to join in if they chose.
That discussion didn't happen. Again in the interest of precision here's the gist. Paulo and I did sit on the LeWeb stage together, but we didn't talk. At least I didn't. Because about 15 minutes before Paulo stepped onto the stage with me I lost my voice.
And when I say "lost", I mean it was as though nanoscale gremlins had been dispatched to my esophagus where they constructed an impenetrable barricade around my vocal cords - nothing was getting through. And I mean nothing.
I'll dispense with further description of the session and instead point you to this video to see for yourself.
Losing one's voice at a conference isn't an altogether unusual experience. It's happened to me before, but generally it transpires after several days of non-stop talking, late night schmoozing, not enough sleep and all that. This time around no such activities preceded the vocal cessation. In fact there was no harbinger whatsoever.
Upon arriving in Paris the Friday night before the conference was to begin, Paulo and I had dinner and spoke at length - mostly about life and life experience, but also about our impending session. Though nervous in advance of our meeting, my butterflies evaporated as we chatted over sushi and sake.
I got lots of rest, managed to pull myself back from the cold from which I'd suffered for several days and I was ready.
And then - WHACK!
Now some might say, "Look Cathy, you had been sick. This was probably nothing more than an uprising of bacterial beasties that had already taken up residence in your body."
This might be true, but someone posited another theory that, frankly, holds more water with me.
The suggestion first came from Anina, and later another conference-goer reiterated it calling it "The Coelho Effect." What this means is simple: losing one's voice taken in a metaphysical sense could represent a loss of words, or in my case, holding back on a conversation that I need to have ... and that I've been avoiding.
While I was ready for the interview and had quelled my nerves over talking with Paulo on stage, the specter of several very important conversations (family-related) hanging over my head trumped all preparation. And since the nature of at least part of the discussion on stage with Paulo was related to communications and transparency, it made perfect sense that my voice opted out at that moment.
The next logical question, of course, is what could possibly be so all consuming that it would have such impact.
But for several reasons I can't go there right now.
First off, I think writing about them now would both be passive-aggressive (better to address the issues directly with the relevant parties first). Secondly, I don't think the situations themselves are all that important. It's the way in which they are resolved and the lessons that emerge after that will matter. Finally, while some might think "Come on Cathy, just say it. This is your blog, after all. You can talk about your feelings if you want." But I'm not interested in gratuitous pontificating that doesn't answer the "so what?" question.
And in reviewing this post right now I ponder whether the above paragraph itself might come across as making an excuse ... and perhaps some of you reading this will think that.
But those of you who believe that all things happen for a reason should understand where I'm coming from ... and hopefully you'll check back to hear how things go.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: An Anniversary With Fitting Parallel
The date was December 10, 1948. The place was Paris, France. Some of the world's most influential leaders and top diplomats gathered to sign the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
It is an interesting parallel that today marks another step in the steady march of the marriage equality movement. "Calling in Gay" was planned to coincide with International Human Rights Day. Some people might balk a bit at comparing the civil rights effort for marriage equality to the literal life and death struggle for human rights being waged in so many parts of the world. To be clear, I am not equating them directly, but the concept of basic civil liberties for all people very much relates to the issue.
And today as I see the Tweets, blog posts and Facebook comments about this latest activist effort for marriage equality, I muse that while we've come quite far in the last 60 years, it's rather remarkable that we still have so far to go.
That's the bad news.
But there is good news.
In this era of compressed time and accelerated life experience, we have the power to learn from the past and change things now - and that's precisely what is happening.
On November 15, hundreds of thousands of people across the United States took to the streets - a massive turnout inspired by the efforts of one woman in Seattle. And this is only the tip of the iceberg. An army of activists, galvanized by the travesty of Proposition 8's passage in California on November 4, have engaged.
And much of these efforts are gaining speed and power thanks to technology. It's a new generation of activism. From Facebook groups and Twitter accounts to web campaigns waged by "real world" organizations, like the Courage Campaign, the movement is gaining steam.
No. Scratch that. It's not just gaining steam - it's taking more solid form, and interestingly, technology is part of that too. While social media platforms are enabling all of these newly hatched activists to communicate, connect and mobilize, there are now some people leveraging technology practices like BarCamp to further strengthen the infrastructure of the movement itself.
(Disclosure: I participated in the show, and am part of the posse organizing the event.)
The premise is simple - the marriage equality movement is marvelous, but it has some real and potentially critical challenges to overcome. At the risk of oversimplifying what is a rather complicated issue, the simple fact is that the old school, top down methods of political activism, just don't work like they used to. In fact, in the case of No on 8, the effort proved to be a failure.
On the other hand, wholly grassroots, viral efforts are only as good as the energy of those involved. And let's face it - most people are lazy. They have good intentions. They come out of the gate all eager and excited with grand ambitions of involvement, but when push comes to shove and it comes time to do things that are tedious, less fun and quite time consuming, most folks either lose interest or just can't afford the time.
What the marriage equality movement needs is a serious injection of Obamafication. Okay, so that's not a real word, but I think we all know what it means. It refers to the amazingly well orchestrated and utterly egalitarian machine behind Barak Obama's campaign. There was clearly a central organization, but the people were empowered. They were given tools, a bunch of information and a central place to which they could turn.
It's not about either/or. It's about and.
And with that I'm reminded of the words of another Declaration - one that also lays near to my heart.
It took a bit of digging but after some time, a lot of conversation and even more rumination I've cleared through my layers of anger and disappointment about the loss on Proposition 8 and found the silver lining.
Why, you may ask, has it taken me this long to write these thoughts? After all, the election was almost two weeks ago and it's not as though the topic hasn't been anchored to the forefront of most of my conversations since then, right?
It's a good question.
And I have an answer for it.
Besides the obvious point that I am just a teensy bit occupied with the world that is business development at a start-up the truth is that I wanted to make sure that the energy with which I was galvanized after the election was ... for lack of a better word ... real.
It's oh-so-easy to get fired up in the moment, and even to sustain such energy for several days as you're swept along - by your own passion as well as the roaring river of others' emotions.
But most people have short attention spans. Myself included. And I'd be lying if I didn't admit to being a bit more than cynical as to whether the collective disgust and fury (or my own) over the Prop 8 debacle would coalesce and gather momentum. Or would it suffer the fate of so many largely unstructured movements and fade away.
Ten days may not bring quite enough data to be considered a statistical conclusion, but I feel pretty safe in saying that just as Democracy proved itself alive and well on November 4th, in the time since, so has the equal rights movement.
Granted it's a pity (and more than a bit shameful) that issues of equal rights are even an issue. But putting that aside, it can't be denied that great progress has been made - and in a relatively short time.
For starters, the last time this issue came to a vote, the delta of loss was slightly north of 22 percent. This time when the very last vote is tallied, that differential will be somewhere between 2 percent and 4 percent.
Did I mention that the last time this issue came to a vote was 8 years ago?
A 20 percent change in 8 years is a pretty big deal.
I won't say they cheated, because technically they didn't. What the proponents of Proposition 8 did was work the system more effectively. They targeted the communities they needed to win with precision, and then they presented those communities with just enough bullshit, pushing them towards the vote to which their inherent community qualities already had them inclined.
It was a masterful stroke of politics given an even greater advantage by the fact that the other side just wasn't as well organized or mobilized.
And that's where the gleam of silver lining explodes through for me.
This experience was to the LGBT community what George W. Bush was for the Democrats - a clarion call to pull our collective heads out of the sand, get serious and get something accomplished.
In the days following the election I watched with amazement and pride as myriad groups appeared across various social media platforms. From "Repeal the CA Ban on Marriage Equality", which is the largest thus far on Facebook, to the NoonProp8 Twitter account, to more traditional web sites that have social media structure underneath them like Join the Impact (and these are merely a few examples), the community is engaged.
These are just a few examples. The Internet is rife with links, groups and organizations sprouting up. Which of course could be a challenge, but I'll address that in a bit because first there are two things about all this that make me proud.
For starters, as a rule the LGBT community isn't altogether cohesive. In fact, as I've written about here before, the infighting and backstabbing is pretty common among the almost ridiculously splintered set of sub-groups. And this time, at least so far, I'm seeing a more true sense of solidarity.
Secondly, and perhaps even more important, is the fact that many of these activities are powered heavily by people who are not members of the gay community.
Now to the challenge of which I made mention above. At the risk of closing on a downer note, I do feel that urging caution is important at this point. And there are three thoughts on which I wish to leave you:
1) Abraham Lincoln said it far better than I ever could, but to paraphrase - a house divided unto itself cannot stand. (If you have never read the full speech, I highly recommend you do so.) And so the LGBT community must put aside its petty differences and stand strong, which leads to the next point, namely;
2) This movement must be inclusive, meaning that this is not about gay rights, this is about the right to marry - for anyone. It is imperative that we rise up from this disappointment stronger as a group and more powerfully allied with the majority, who we know truly supports civil liberties for all.
3) And finally, it is critical we learn from our mistakes. This is not about a traditional, top-down political effort. This is about doing for the latest struggle of the civil rights movement what Obama did for overall politics. And it's not an either/or. It's about AND.
I am proud to be stepping forward and joining forces with some amazing people in an effort to help bridge the divide among the various parties, bring together the old-school top down approach with the truly democratized power of social media.
The following commentary is re-posted from ZDNET, where it appeared today as part of a collective commentary, curated by Dennis Howlett. The premise was simple: McKinsey did a survey of women in business. They put their report out a week or so ago. Dennis Tweeted about it, and was hit by a lot of comments. So, since the survey was about women, he engaged a posse of us to offer our thoughts.
To be honest the whole gender thing in business has always been a bit off putting to me. While I cannot discount the fact that the glass ceiling - while deeply cracked - is still far from shattered, at the same time, I've always held that the most critical part of being a strong woman in business is just to be strong in business. Be aware of the issues, but keep your eye on the ball and kick ass.
Granted I speak from the perspective of a woman who has benefited from a cavalcade of strong females who marched ahead of me. These women, starting with the suffragettes and continuing through the ensuing ripples of the feminist movement, are the reason women like me have a relatively easy time of it these days.
But this isn't about feminism nor is it about gender equality. This is about how, in today's changing business landscape, perhaps it's time to look more closely at where the genders shouldn't be looking at their differences but instead start looking at how to emulate the best of both worlds. And considering where old practices have gotten us, perhaps it's time when being a woman - or at least acting like one - could be the most powerful asset you have for success.
The parts of the equation detailed in the McKinsey survey - feelings and such - are traditionally the purview of women. In today's world, however, compassion, heart and having some sort of emotional connection are of paramount importance ... regardless of gender.
The part I find amusing, actually, is the title of the survey. They call it "centered" management perhaps because the moniker "self" centered connotes the traditionally megalomaniacal, self-absorbed tendencies of the ruthless CEO - Larry Ellison comes to mind as one example. And it is true that if you look across the large number of successful business leaders, it is probably pretty likely that you'd be hard pressed to call any of them "nice", "kind", or "compassionate" individuals. Oftentimes I'd venture that it's their utterly self-absorbed, don't-give-a-shit about anyone perspective that has been central to their success.
But I would argue that the times allowing this sort of behavior are drawing to a close and that today's world demands different behavior. It's time to turn egotistical preoccupation into awareness and action.
To me the McKinsey survey results aren't a surprise, except maybe insofar as no one had said it already.
It has perhaps never been more critical in business - or in politics or anything else for that matter - that leadership exhibit a sense of compassion, understanding and self-awareness. Perhaps it's simplistic to put in these terms but it takes me back to childhood and the lessons taught by my parents. Specifically that the first step in being a strong leader is to first be strong within yourself.
Following the five points outlined in the McKinsey survey, it seems to me that the best leaders are ones who are most in tune with themselves and who can then take their awareness and put it into practice.
I would posit that while women do not have the corner on the market for this sort of behavior (I have worked with many a male CEO whose compassion was one of the core parts of their super leadership, in fact I'm working with one now) we do, perhaps, have a home court advantage.
But enough about my thoughts - what do YOU think?
You didn't expect me to let you try and get away with just READING this did you?
Of course not.
With that, here's a conversation I invite you to join. It was started on Seesmic, and has been embedded at ZDNET as well. When you click on "Play" the "reply" button will appear in the upper right corner. Clicking on that prompts you either to log-in to your Seesmic account or register for one if you don't. The sign up is super simple and you will not leave this Web site to do it ... so don't be shy ...
Behaviors in business: The female advantage?Forbes article summary of McKinsey report: http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/03/talent-women-leadership-lead-cx_1003mckinsey.html
The power of mentoring: Helping hands for women appying to Y-Combinator for 10/17
Ycombinator, a technology incubator based in Mountain View and Silicon Valley, is taking applicationsthrough Friday, October 17th 10pm PST for its winter 2008 incubator cycle.
The most excellent Susan Mernit has galvanized a small group of us who are interested in seeing if we can help increase the percentage of women accepted this time around.
So ... If you are a woman who is planning to apply to ycombinator for this cycle and you'd like to have some mentoring and support before you submit your application from an experienced woman CEO/executive/entrepreneur sort, there's a posse of dames with moxie who are interested in working with you.
(Yes, I am one of them.)
To get involved with this group and ideally paired with a mentor, send an email with contact information and information about your proposal to pinkgaragementors@gmail.com; we'll circulate your information among our team and reach back to you.
If you are mentored, you will receive an hour or more of coaching with a woman exec. who has been through a tech incubator program, has been a tech CEO or co-founder, a tech industry analyst/journalist, is a VC or maybe even some combination of the aforementioned.
I hate to pull the whole "women are just more compassionate leaders" thing, but the truth of the matter is that we're in dire economic times and those times - more than any other - call for the type of leadership that operates from both the head AND the heart. And I think it's pretty clear how things are now based on the leadership we've had to-date.
Who better to proffer an alternative than an intelligent, aggressive (in the good sort of way), powerful female entrepreneur.
Here's to helping foster a new generation.
Sharing: When a personal story can help others ...
There are a couple of topics I just don't address publicly. My health is one of them. But in this case, I'm making an exception - partly because it turned out to be a false alarm, and partly because it speaks pretty directly to the subject I addressed in this week's column for BitchBuzz.
I walked into the office, went back into an exam room and the nurse came in. She took my weight (depressing) and then my blood pressure.
It was marginally better, 135 over 80, but still pretty elevated.
Great.
In came my physician. Dr. Gary Apter. He's just about the calmest, most easygoing fellow you'll meet - good thing in a doctor. He's been my doctor since I moved to California 18 years ago and has seen me through some pretty rocky business.
He sat down across from me and we began to talk. He asked how I was doing. He asked what I was doing for work. He inquired about my family. And then, as he continued chatting with me, he began - very slowly - to move over and pull out the blood pressure cuff.
As we continued chatting he wrapped the cuff around my right arm. Then he said:
"Okay Cathy. Now I want you to take three deep breaths."
I did.
Nearing the third exhale, Dr. Apter began taking my blood pressure. The cuff tightened. I felt my breath catch. Dr Apter paused and reminded me to breathe. I did.
He moved the cuff to my left arm and we went through the process once more. Again I felt my breath begin to catch as the cuff tightened. He paused and reminded me to breathe.
He finished with the reading and again, he smiled.
"110 over 65."
Putting the stethoscope around his neck Dr. Apter told me that I needed a vacation.
The bad news was that in spite of my definitely being overextended and tired from work, I hadn't been feeling particularly stressed, and so the fact I'd become so normalized to such a tightly wound state gave me serious pause.
So for this trip I opted to cut myself off entirely from my usual digital connections for several days. No Twitter. No Facebook (or any other social network for that matter). No Seesmic. No email.
It was glorious.
And as I mentioned in that BitchBuzz post, the world didn't come screeching to a halt without me. That's a bit depressing, of course. We all love to feel that we're entirely critical and without our presence things would just collapse.
Truth of the matter is that while each individual is certainly important, and while we all bring value (at least hopefully so), when push comes to shove even the most influential, luminary powerful people are completely and utterly dispensible.
Lest you think this vacation served to do nothing more than turn me into Debbie Downer, allow me to offer some perspective.
Social media tools in their marvelous connectivity are a most excellent way to maintain the links you have to existing friends. It's also a way to discover new people and have a chance to learn about them in a way never before possible. In today's world we are truly living the Global Village experience.
You may hear a rather sizable "but" coming along and you'd be right.
Even with all the good that can come from this always-on world, it's important that one doesn't mistake being connected for being ... well ... overly important. Don't get me wrong, we are all as individuals very important ... each person's life matters in the big picture. That should not, however, be confused with being indispensable.
It's about balance. Having a healthy self-esteem is good. Thinking that the world revolves on your axis, is not.
So the whole idea of this blog thing is that you're supposed to jot off thoughts - quicksilver ideas that zip through your mind.
Thing is, I've always been more of an essayist and tend to wax on more than off when it comes to telling my tales and proffering any punditry (such as it is).
Twitter has gone a long way towards helping me shake up that foundation a bit. The whole concept of spitting out thoughts in 140 characters or less really makes you get to the point.
But when it comes to this particular space, my inclination is to meditate, ruminate and even on occasion marinate a particular thought or idea and then try to make some bigger picture connection.
Not tonight.
And it's for a simple reason.
I spent a bit more than two hours on the phone with a friend whose very voice on the other end puts a smile on my face and, more importantly, in my heart. The funny thing is that we've not been friends all that long, but in a relatively short period have shared some rather intense experiences, deeply personal stories and incredibly intimate emotions. It's a friendship that caught me completely off-guard (in the best of all possible ways), and my life is all the more rich for it.
So here I sit.
I should have gone to bed about an hour ago. But I find myself energized and relaxed all at the same time. Curled up in the chair that my parents gave me from my childhood home, gazing out from the muted amber light of my living room to the sparkling cityscape outside (there's a warm whooshing sound from distant traffic), I have a sense that the distant hum I hear actually is coming from inside of me.
What will computers empower us to do over the next 40 years?
This may seem a strange question for someone who's just coming back from a vacation, and so lest you think I've taken a turn for the geek in the last days, allow me to explain.
Interesting parallel for me - the fact that Intel and I were born in the same year. I'm a bit older, actually, but I think Intel's had a bit more work done than I have ... at least so far. It's early yet on that front.
As for why I'm writing about this now instead of back in July, let's just say it's more like I'm just finishing up. I started this on June 5 and have iterated quite a few times.
But now that I've returned from my little vacation, freshly renewed and revisiting all that is tech, I figured it was time to post. If for no other reason than to start back to work (and kick-off September) with a fresh slate.
That, and frankly after spending time at the Intel Developer Forum last week I was feeling guilty that I'd not gotten around to this ...
To be honest, before getting the email heralding Intel's big anniversary, I hadn't given Intel's age much thought. Kind of like my own 40th.
I opted this year for a low-key (for me) approach to my birthday - a night out at the symphony with a friend (Brahms 4th ... and a superlative performance of it at that) and then a small gathering for champagne and dessert at Jardiniere's J Lounge.
But at some point during this "heck, 40's just another year and not a big deal" process, things shifted a bit. It didn't become monumental but it did become a mile marker. And with that I started thinking about my evolution over the last 40 years ...
What I'm doing now bears little resemblance to what I thought I'd be doing when I "grew up" but the motivation and the result are spot on. (If you ask what I thought I'd be doing ... I'll say this, Shakespeare was right, all the world is a stage...)
And I say Intel isn't all that different - except that they may have a few more challenges to face.
I'm in an interesting position from which to comment on this. I was invited to be part of a group that Intel initiated this year called the "Intel Insiders". Comprised by a collection of entrepreneurial/blogger/vlogger/media/communications sorts, the idea is that Intel gives us advance peeks at various projects in order to give our perspective and counsel on how to best leverage social media in those projects.
We met and got to speak with a passel of Intel folks including Sean Maloney - who offered some surprising statistics regarding where Intel would be putting it's marketing budget moving forward. (Side note: he said that 80 percent of all marketing spend would move online in the next year. This is a considerable increase from their earlier statements on this.)
I had to skate out a bit early so missed the tour that resulted in this picture. But it was superb to bond with the group a bit and get a sense of what we might be doing.
That was several months ago, and to be honest we've not done a whole lot since then. There have been some emails but largely the program itself is still finding its legs.
But back to IDF and my thinking about Intel ...
Much of the conversation at IDF surrounded, as you might guess, the announcements the company was making but I had equally as many discussions about Intel as brand and bellweather for Silicon Valley.
Here is a company deeply embedded in the Motherboard of Silicon Valley - actually, scratch that, they pretty much built the Motherboard of Silicon Valley. In any case, they are at their very core a chip company. That's what they do. They make the stuff that sits at the heart of all those things we love - from computers to now television sets, set top boxes, cars and even a personal space flight vehicle.
But a couple of years ago, Intel made a choice. They decided that no longer did they want to be "just" that chip company. They wanted to be a consumer company.
No easy task.
I mean, most folks don't really care what goes inside their electronics, appliances or modes of transport - they just want them to work. This isn't too dissimilar from the challenge faced by another tech industry stalwart, Cisco.
So what's a company to do? People's minds and perspectives can and do change, but it takes Herculean effort and even then can be dicey.
Going back to where Intel's path and mine seem to run parallel - as I mentioned, while the things I do day to day may not be what I'd thought years ago, the type of work I'm doing and the motivation behind it (finding ways to get myriad, diverse groups connected and talking with each other) is right on the mark. It's taken me years of wending my way through a fascinating, if sometimes Labyrinth-like series of pathways, but at some point I internalized that which meant most to me - my core motivation if you will - and suddenly found myself square in the path of the work I'm currently doing.
Intel has taken the first steps. They have recognized that things need to change and are engaging with resources and outside voices to gain perspective. They seem to be listening to that counsel, and the next step will be for them to truly internalize and build on that new foundation.
It's a bit like changing the wings on an airplane that's already mid-flight across the Atlantic, but that's a different story.
And of course there's the issue of Moore's Law ... and whether or not Intel can maintain the increasingly breakneck pace with which the technology now accelerates.
From a personal perspective the whole time acceleration thing presents issues of its own, but as my friend Rob Hayes so kindly offered when I told him about my hitting the four decade mark in sync with Intel ... "Cathy, of course you're like Intel ... you get twice as good, every 18 months."
It actually happened two days ago - almost to the minute as I write this.
I fell in love with Vancouver. (That's Vancouver, BC, btw)
For those who know me, and even for many who don't, it's abundantly clear from any number of tales I may have shared that I have a deep, passionate and truly connected love for San Francisco. It goes to the marrow of my bones, and has been like that since I stepped off the plane on June 26, 1990.
Part of this love comes from perspective. I've had the good fortune to travel a bit - both around the US and a touch of international - and no matter where I go, and how much fun I might have in other places, the best part of any trip for me is that approach to SFO over the Bay (added bonus if lucky enough to be on the approach pattern that takes in a sweeping, banked turn around the downtown area of SF and the Golden Gate).
So when I had a moment here in Vancouver this past Sunday afternoon - a moment when my heart swelled like it sometimes does back home in SF - it made me catch my breath, and then smile.
It was an otherwise unremarkable moment in time, strolling along and turning the corner off Granville by the Vancouver Art Gallery. It may have been the smell (a deep, damp, green earth scent blended with wafting aromas of salt and brine from the sea); it may have been the light (dappled amber when not shifted to gray from the charcoal clouds pregnant in the sky); it was probably a bit of both combined with some deeper sense that just felt comfortable - not dissimilar to how I felt upon stepping off the plane in the Bay Area on that hot, June morning eighteen years ago.
Amidst the sounds of city (construction, traffic, conversations - a strangely melodic audio melee) I could hear the raucous laughter of seagulls - reminding me of my summers in Atlantic City, NJ. I was born and raised along the Main Line suburbs of Philadelphia, PA but summer - and many weekends in the winter "off" season - meant heading for the Jersey Shore and our place one block from the beach.
I tell people that I spent my summers in the yellow section of the Monopoly board - between Ventnor and Atlantic avenues not too far from Marvin Gardens.
Really.
My dad grew up down there - back in the days when Atlantic City, NJ wasn't the punchline of a bad Vegas joke but rather an elegant seaside community where people actually did raise children.
As I recall the story, he and my mother met the summer after she graduated Penn State University. Her family, which was from Philadelphia, spent summers in Atlantic City. So after her college graduation, down to the shore they went. And, as these things go, someone (probably from the synagogue) said, "Hey, have I got a nice boy to introduce to your Doris..."
And so my parents met.
There are funny stories about those early days, but those must wait for another day, because this is a story about the place not the people. More to the point it's about what it means when a place reveals itself to be your soul mate.
Atlantic City always has held an incredibly strong place in my heart. It does to this day. I adored those summers and to this day the scent of sea (and the usual accompanying aromas of tar and wood from docks) sends me to a very special place in my memory. A place that is equal parts safe, warm, happy and hopeful.
But I digress ...
I was talking about the experience of feeling suddenly at home in a place that is, for all intents and purposes, a wholly strange place. Sure I was in Vancouver once before - in the September of 2005 for about four days - but that doesn't exactly a deep relationship make.
And that last trip, while fun, certainly didn't amount to any sort of deeply connected experience. I had fun and noted that Vancouver was a place I had to visit again.
So to be strolling by myself down a random street and suddenly feel that I was home was a particular jolt.
As I noted in a previous commentary, I came here to Vancouver for some R&R and to see what might come up if I let myself ... just ... connect.
And here's the takeaway thus far ... home does lie precisely where the heart does.
I'm not headed anywhere particularly exotic, though I am leaving town.
The weather won't be tropical and beachy, in fact it may be raining.
But I don't care.
For me, this is all about just doing it. Unplugging.
"Um, Cathy. What's the big deal? People turn off their computers and cell phones all the time."
Really?
In light of the reactions that many gave to my telling them I was extricating myself from the social media power grid for a handful of days, I became more convinced that our ever-connectedness was, indeed, more than a little bit of a societal problem.
And then I read today's New York Times (Yes, I actually read the physical paper ... almost all of it I'm proud to say) ... and came across Ben Stein's column.
Over time I grew to learn that he was not just "that guy" from Ferris Bueller's Day Off, but indeed an accomplished writer, comic, actor and someone who actually also had a solid knack for offering great financial advice.
And so that's my test for myself this week - just how connected can I be to the people immediately around me? How connected can I be to the sights and sounds and smells of my here and now?
Obviously I'm writing this while on vacation so I've not wholly severed my connection, but have committed to only writing and perhaps posting some photos from my adventures.
I wrote a post on BitchBuzz this week talking about what happens when people who are normally rather adept in social situations run into momentary lapses of reason - due to technology.
The background on the story was left out of the post on BB, mostly because it's personal and so not appropriate to share there.
But I feel as though the story merits a closer look.
So here it goes...
A month or so back I was out with some friends. I was in a particularly cantankerous mood (which for anyone who knows me can mean anything from me being somewhat sassy to downright snarky. This particular night fell somewhere towards the middle of that continuum). One of the friends in the posse was in particularly bad state (recent break up and things of that nature). Suffice to say that this was an oil and water sort of situation that for some reason I felt compelled to Twitter.
Not only because this particular friend follows me, but because the Tweet I sent wasn't particularly clear about what was really going on in my noggin.
The truth of the matter is that it had nothing to do with her. I wasn't up for going out that night but had committed to going, so I went - in spite of feeling crappy. Thus when my friend's behavior got on the 1/8 of a nerve I had, she became a logical target. Well, logical in my not-too-logically-thinking state, at least.
As it read, the Tweet was a direct attack on her. Someone even responded to my Tweet saying: "Wow. Bet you're pretty sure this person doesn't follow you on Twitter." My response was that she did and if she asked me about it, I'd talk with her directly.
This is where my trespass began.
When she emailed me the following Monday - no subject line and a single line in the body of the note saying: "Nice Twitter comment this weekend" - I responded that the Tweet had nothing to do with her.
Which was true, but she didn't believe me. And based on how the Tweet read she was right in believing that - especially since in my response to her I failed to explain what was actually on my mind that night. Not that this would have excused my Tweet, but it would have at least set the record straight.
To make a long story short this friend's feelings were hurt - and rightfully so. And to make matters worse as a result of this communications kerfuffle she pretty much stopped talking to me for a while.
Now there are parts of this story I'm truncating and to be honest I do feel that while her feelings are valid, her reaction to it was slightly north of exaggerated. But that's not the point for this tale.
The point here is that in an attempt to be transparent about what was going on with me, I hurt someone's feelings. And then when she approached me about it rather than stepping up, I stepped away.
Long story short, this friend and I met up for drinks recently, and after an hour or so (and a few beverages to grease the skids of difficult discussion) we got into "the conversation."
That's when she said something surprising. She told me that while I may think that I'm transparent, I'm not.
But sharing shouldn't be mistaken for transparency and in fact, sometimes just because you're talking doesn't mean you're actually saying anything.
My point?
Simple, really.
For starters, and I said this in my BitchBuzz post today, Etiquette matters. On that I'll point to a recent post by Chris Brogan that I think outlines some rather solid basic etiquette rules that apply to various social media platforms.
But more to the point, I've realized that transparency is relative. What one person sees as appropriate or acceptable to share may be utterly out of the question for another.
In today's always-on-digitally-linked world, paying closer attention to the above mentioned social etiquette becomes even more important. And as we wend our way through being open, sharing our thoughts and telling stories, be mindful that just because you're okay with laying out your dirty laundry for everyone to see, doesn't mean others who might be involved in the story are.
Before you spout off under the umbrella of being authentic and raising your voice, make sure you're not raining crap on someone else.
I'm not precisely sure at what point it happened, but it would seem that at some juncture I opted to live my life as somewhat of a group activity.
I don't know that it was particularly planned, orchestrated or otherwise arranged, but with very little exception I share pretty much everything.
Okay so that's not entirely true ... there are some subjects I've chosen to avoid altogether. There are others I raise only when utterly integral to a given story. But as a rule, the day-to-day, moment-to-moment experience that is my ever-so-mercurial ride through the world of start-ups, Silicon Valley and ... well ... life ... has become an open book.
Friends who've known me a while probably would just say that technology finally caught up to the way that I just ... am. Which, put in perspective, is that it's a pretty rare occasion when you can't tell what I'm feeling at a given moment.
If I'm happy - it's clear.
If I'm sad - it's clear.
And if I'm angry ... well, let's just say most folks don't particularly like me in the state. Frankly neither do I.
But that's not the point of this post.
I realized that unlike some of my blogosphere brethren, I don't have a sidebar on this blog that enumerates the various and sundry ways by which you can find me.
Quel horror.
And so, with a brief interlude at the keyboard, I rectify this trespass with the following selection of social media flavors. (It's not as though finding me on-line is particularly hard. Hell, just Google me and you'll see at least a few pages of accurate connections. Strangely if you remove the space between my names you get some other very interesting items. Like this video I've only just found ... )
But for those not inclined to hunt - and frankly so I have it all in one place - I've created this directory of sorts.
Whether it's one or more of these, I hope you'll connect, communicate with me and - above all - tell me what you think.
UPDATE: People also have asked for a list of all the blogs on which I write (other than here, of course), so here's a quick directory:
Huffington Post - where I opine on issues facing the LGBT community around social media Technically Women - where I hammer on issues facing women in technology (along with a bevy of other brainiacs) Social Media Hour - my weekly Internet-based talk show focused less on technology and more on the way we use it. Brian Solis - where I talk about all kinds of things, usually communications issues gone awry.
I've also written in the past for BitchBuzz, though haven't done that in about a year.
There was only one thing wrong with BlogHer08 - I didn't get to spend more than a handful of hours there on the first day. Sadly, my travel required my heading out of town and so had to miss almost everyhing, but I did have the pleasure of leading a session on the first afternoon . For the uninitiated, BlogHer is the annual confab that boasts one of the most comprehensive and powerful collections of women on the Internet.
My partner in crime for the session, Amber Scott, and I met only by phone and email prior to our leading the nearly two hour talk on videoblogging - a fact that shocked several of those who stayed afterwards to speak with us.
After all, if there's one thing that women, I believe, have in spades over men is their ability to join forces and connect with each other in very short order. When two strong women connect (provided their energy doesn't clash so much that they repel) the result is almost always an exponential expansion of their respective strength.
All one had to do was walk through the lobby of the Westin St. Francis even in the early hours of BlogHer08 as people began to arrive and the energy was palpable. By Friday afternoon the air in the halls of the Westin fairly vibrated with it.
Many a Tweet, blog post and status update (even from the few men who populated the hallways) remarked on the fact that there was a clear and tangible sense that things were happening ... connections being made ... ideas being born ...
I go to a ridiculous number of conferences, events and gatherings during the course of a given year and can state with full certainty that there is no other technology/business related gathering that comes even close to the incredibly powerful sense created at BlogHer.
Let's face it. Generally relationships end for very good reason, and while we humans tend to romanticize those affairs and connections of the past, remembering only those beautiful moments fit for soft-focus camera close-ups, the truth is that when two people don't get along - for whatever reason - oftentimes it's due to innate parts of who they are. And people don't change.
I like to think that people don't change *who* they are, but can certainly change *how* they are in the world. Meaning that the core sense of my personality is what it is, and has been baked in that way pretty much since puberty, but the behaviors I display and the way in which I move through the world is something wholly under my control to adapt, amend and - when need be - alter.
What, you may ask, was the catalyst for such philosophic prattle on a Sunday morning?
It is Pride Weekend here in San Francisco and, as so often seems to be the case with this weekend, I had an encounter last night that gives rise to an obligatory review of my take on relationships.
My plans were simple. I'd spent the day in Dolores Park with my dear friend Christina Saint-Laurent, her partner Jude and their pals at the annual Dyke Day picnic. As the park got crowded, I made my way home and to the gym with the plans to meet up with my pal Beth and some others at 2223 Market around 9pm.
I, of course, was late and so dashed into the front door figuring they'd already be seated. Not only had they not arrived (and as it turned out, they would not show up at all, as some sort of "drama" struck the group earlier in the evening and they disbanded before getting to 2223) ... but when I stepped through the door and began to look around, I found myself looking into a pair of ever-so-familiar green eyes.
My heart stopped.
Well, more like it stuttered, staggered and then began a rapid staccato that was all-too-familiar.
There are people who pass through our lives. There are others whose souls seem inextricably linked to ours by some sort of cosmic connection.
This relationship was one of short duration (only about five months), and that was 10 years ago ... but for some reason static electricity lingers.
It leaves me thinking about what that means in my life ... what is it that I have yet to learn and once learned where will I go?
So it's a VERY exciting day here at Seesmic! For the uninitiated, Seesmic is all about empowering people to talk with each other on-line using video as the conduit. And we've created a technology platform that enables you to have this conversation across multiple platforms at the same time.
Think of it like a big room full of people and the room has doors and windows all around it. Each door and window represents a different point of entry to the conversation. For some it might be via Twitter, for others from a social network, it could be from a blog or even from Seesmic itself.
What you see below is the first iteration of our brand new, threaded, standalone player - with built in record/reply functionality. This is a conversation that started on Seesmic ... expanded here to my blog ... and I also dropped it into my MySpace profile.
So check it out ... and if you don't have a Seesmic account already, if you click on reply below you can register and get one! Don't worry, no download necessary :)
Recycling, or how I decided to re-post an entry from my MySpace profile to avoid finishing another post.
If the hypersensitive hyperlinked nature of the previous paragraph hasn't put you off too badly, hopefully you'll read this item I just rediscovered - on my own MySpace page.
To be perfectly frank, MySpace isn't really my cup of tea. I find the interface to be overly complicated and busy, the pages take too damn long to load, and most of my day-to-day social media environment leans into other platforms anyway.
The only reason I reactivated my stagnant account two years ago (because like any good early adopter I signed up and set a basic profile page just about when MySpace started ... and promptly let it go fallow) was because someone in whom I was a bit interested used it as her primary channel of communication. So if I wanted a response to email, that was where I had to go.
That friendship proved relatively short-lived (for reasons of which I'm not entirely certain) but in any case the profile once again went to seed.
But on my recent trip to LA for Digital Hollywood, I connected with some old friends and made some new ones - all of whom tend to use MySpace a bit more often. So back there I went ... cleaning up some photos, adding a bit of fresh content, and reviewing things I'd left there.
And I came across this item.
I wrote it in July of last year and while the weather patterns don't yet reflect the deep fog and damp of San Francisco summer, there's something about the air today that feels ... well ... like another season altogether.
So I wanted to share it again, and this time in a place where a few more people might enjoy it ...
As originally posted on MySpace - July 11, 2007:
Aromatherapy
Current mood: contemplative
Category: Life
It's on nights like tonight that it hits me particularly hard.
It's late and I was going to step outside with Truman for his pre-bedtime constitutional. The front door of my building is a heavy one - my building being one of those early 1920's Edwardian sorts that are so prevalent in San Francisco.
First the low squeak of the hinge, then a nearly silent whoosh as it swung back, and then I caught it - that unmistakable scent ...
There's nothing like living near the ocean. Granted I can't see it from my window - not unless you count the teensy sliver of bay that, on clear days, I can see between two high rises to the south. But the ever-present sense of sea wraps around me daily, just as it edges San Francisco on three sides.
Recently I made a trip to San Francisco City Hall. It was time to renew my consulting business license. I stood in the City Collectors office and stared at the towering photograph stretching about 10 feet across the wall. It was an aerial shot of the San Francisco skyline taken from somewhere above the Bay Bridge, circa 1963.
Besides the conspicuous absence of now iconic images like the Transamerica Pyramid, the Embarcadero Center and AT&T Park, it was shocking to see just how much of the waterfront area at that time was dedicated to shipping and warehouses - a city living from the sea.
Not any more. Now San Francisco is largely an information economy town. As the northern civilized anchor to the digital breadbasket of Silicon Valley, San Francisco's bread and butter comes from technology. There is still a vibrant waterfront, but largely now landscaped with terraced stone benches sporting weird brackets in the shape of sea creatures designed to both decorate ... and dissuade skateboarders.
Every day people trundle to their buses, cars and trains heading for offices where they toil merrily (or not so). At day's end - especially in summer months when the fog comes in - they retreat from their cubicle cages to some other location to while a few hours before starting it again.
How many people take the time before or after engaging in that work to take a moment and pull in a deep drink of that cool sea-tinged air? How many people are so disconnected from their environment that they can't even catch that scent as is wafts past them on their way to work, to the market, to get the kids at school?
I stood in my old Muckrakers softball jersey and sweatpants, silky cold marble of the front steps under my feet, waiting as Truman took his treeside stroll. Slightly humid air with a cool whoosh of breeze passed by. Truman returned, but I remained still, long swallows of the briny scent filling my lungs, wishing that instead of heading back inside and up the elevator that I had a hammock or Adirondack chair so that I could fall asleep wrapped in the downy comfort of the sea.
With the mental maelstrom sorted, I'm clear of mind enough to hammer out some final thoughts from my Kinnernet/Traveling Geeks 2008 adventure in Israel.
In the spirit of brevity (and clarity), I'm opting to embrace my not-so-inner-Virgo moon and clear out these last items in short order.
So fasten your seat belt, and perhaps keep a crash helmet nearby, as I whip through a series of powerful and impactful events:
Rogozin School
There is, at some point, a far more in-depth commentary from me about this visit. For now, however, I'll defer to the words of my fellow TG, Robert Scoble because his truly touching post paints a lovely picture of our visit.
Peres Center for Peace
In December 2006, I had the pleasure of hearing Shimon Peres speak at LeWeb. He said that while governments might posture and make noise about peace, the truth is that it was up to the private sector to establish the infrastructure necessary to maintain and grow a peaceful society. That is what the Peres Center for Peace endeavors to do - bridge chasms between disparate groups by bringing the sides together to tackle common issues (education, agriculture, children).
Good Vision
Sadly I missed most of this presentation. As was the case with pretty much our entire week, we were running late. Based on an earlier version of our schedule, which showed Thursday afernoon open, I had arranged a series of meetings with entrepreneurs in Tel Aviv.
Israeli Entrepreneurship - the Ladies' Way
This trip to Israel brought with it several opportunities to meet a few of the powerful women rising in the ranks of this innovative community. Susan Mernit wrote a great post that captures the essence of how the woman who populate this incredibly aggressive and rapidly moving technology market manage to blaze trails while remaining utterly committed to forward movement of technology and in supporting other women in the market.
My last meeting finished up at about 7:00pm. The Traveling Geeks were to have one last dinner together, but unfortunately some pressing deadlines back in the States required that I work through dinner (since I'd spend the entire next day on the plane).
I sent the last email, got my bags pretty much packed, and that's when I made a decision that, while perhaps not the most intelligent choice I've ever made, certainly was fun.
Our flight was to depart at about 8am. That meant getting to the airport by 6am. Which meant leaving the hotel around 5:15am.
"No problem," I thought to myself. "I just won't go to sleep."
Oy.
While the tales of the evening are amusing, I have to think about whether or not they're appropriate to share ... (and of course if I have to think about it, that probably means the answer is that I shouldn't).
But in any case ... with the trip now in the rearview mirror and many adventures on the horizon, I conclude this last Traveling Geeks Israel 2008 post... and look forward to the future and more TG adventures!
From Old City Inspiration to New Ventures: A day in Jerusalem
The last 24 hours have been somewhat strange for me. There's been a sizable amount of meshugass on this trip - misfired communications, sardine-like conditions of our "bus" (which was actually a late model Ford van that the Israeli Consulate very graciously replaced today with a proper tour bus... YAY!), and the TG gang consensus that our goals for the trip and the itinerary were a bit off kilter.
As a result I have several half-finished posts sitting in my draft folder that I've just not been able to complete. (Confession: I'm a relatively newly minted blogger in terms of style. My writing has always tended to be a bit more in-depth analytical second day story type of stuff, so this whole rapid-fire writing thing is a new challenge).
In any case, that mini-backlog of items is going to have to wait a bit longer because after today's adventures I'm focused on something deeply important to me.
Faith.
More specifically the way in which faith inspires.
It's funny to think that on my first trip to Jerusalem in the summer of 1995, I found myself nearly paralyzed at my first approach to the Western Wall.. While I've only returned to the spot twice since that time, I've had exactly the opposite experience on each return. Rather than feeling repelled by the energy that comes off of this majestic edifice, it's as though a tractor beam grabs me, pulling me in.
But I'm getting ahead of myself... the story begins when we began the most enjoyable forced march you can imagine.
The TravelingGeek squad arrived in Jerusalem this morning and was met immediately by the warmly intense visage of Tikva Levine - the woman who was to be equal parts tour guide, historian and drill sergeant for our marathon morning. We had two hours to conquer a pretty substantial amount of territory in the Old City.
With Tikva charging in the lead, conquer it we would.
We began on the sun-drenched perch that is the Walter and Elise Haas Promenade. Tikva gave a superb overview, explaining the physical geography of the City, the history behind it, and the outlined where we'd go. Then it was back to the bus and off for the walled City.
Unlike my first Old City walking tour, which focused wholly on the Jewish aspect of this place, our tour encompassed the Christian Quarter and part of the Arab Quarter as well. We entered through Zion Gate, one of seven open gates into Old Jerusalem. With little time to spare, we proceeded in a near sprint from spot to spot - David's Tomb, the room in which The Last Supper is said to have taken place, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
Out of deference for the personal experiences of my colleagues, I won't share what specifically occurred for some as we made our way along. If they wish to share what they felt, then they will do so in their own time in their own way.
These are personal experiences and not everyone writes with their heart stapled to their sleeve as I do.
Suffice to say that for more than a couple TGs there were tears accompanied by statements about feeling connected, overwhelmed with a sense of belonging, and ultimately a sensation that whatever feelings or beliefs they may have held before, their lives were now changed.
For me, the wave of emotion hit upon emerging from the Arab Quarter into the bright light of the plaza by the Western Wall. My body went into autopilot and I made a beeline for the spot where I have gone in the past. My forehead against the warm, silken stone I got that feeling - the one the draws me back again and again.
It's an incredible sensation that I've plugged in directly to a spiritual mainframe, with energy pulsing and throbbing through thousands of years of prayer into my body, racing through my limbs and back again. The tears began before I could even form a thought in my head, and welled up thickly behind my closed eyes. It's not until I briefly blinked a few minutes later that the flood streams down my face.
My time at the Wall was only about 10 minutes, but in that time I felt an eternity of energy and peaceful power seep into me. As is customary, I placed a note between the stones of the wall. I'd taken several minutes at lunch to write down some thoughts and wishes - both for myself and for friends. Backing away (you don't turn your back on the Wall, instead you're supposed to stay facing it and back up to the end of the plaza out of respect for the Holiness of the place).
We bade farewell to Tikva at this point and headed for a meeting with Jerusalem Venture Partners. Needless to say, at the time it was the last thing I really wanted to do. As we all rode on the bus towards the offices, we opened our computers and began to silently check email.
And then the Twitter frenzy began.
I'm not sure where it started, but unless you're subscribed to @cathybrooks, @sarahcuda, @renee27, @susanmernit, @jdlasica, and @scobleizer ... Well, let's just say that you missed a ridiculously hysterial (and yes, rather juvenile) stream of shenanigans.
(And by the way if you're NOT subscribed to all of those folks, I'd highly recommend you change that ... While we're going our separate ways at week's end and won't be cloistered in a bus any more, I get a sense the Twittering antics will continue ... but I digress...)
So we pulled up to the JVP offices still recuperating from our hysterics - the kind of deep, belly laughter (that for Sarah and me ended in massive coughing fits as we've both been sick on this trip).
Frankly I was worried about my ability to focus during the meeting. I didn't think that after such a deeply spiritual experience, capped by a near exhausting session of laughter that I would find anything else of interest.
Not only was I not bored, I found myself deeply engaged and wishing we had more time.
Perhaps it has something to do with the energy and power of this place that helps energize and propel the superb level of innovation I've seen this week.
After my experience at the Wall today, I tend to think that's the case.
Our little ragtag TravelingGeek posse has had quite a time this week. Through our array of experiences - from the unsinkable Sarah Lacy battling what may well be Pneumonia and the startling experience Craig Newmark had while visiting Seambiotic - the wandering geeks have bobbed and weaved through minor adversity, managing to maintain a mostly jovial energy throughout.
But unexpected experience is part and parcel of life here, and I believe are also central to why, as one of my TravelingGeek compatriots, Robert Scoble, commented today, Israel is probably the only place outside of Silicon Valley where the pulse of entrepreneurship beats as powerfully.
From where I sit (which I should mention is on a brand new bus that the Israeli Government got the TravelingGeeks today for our trip to Jerusalem!), it's clear why innovation and entrepreneurship thrive here.
It's about fear ... or perhaps better to say, lack thereof.
One of the most critical ingredients to a well-baked entrepreneurial spirit is courage. This includes an ability to power forward in the face of adversity and confusion, the inner strength to get up and try again should the venture fail and the skill to focus on the task at hand, even when chaos reigns around you.
Located on the far north of the country, this facility is one of five major hospitals in the country. It's also 35KM from the Lebanese border. In the summer of 2006, when war broke out and Ketusha rockets began raining from the skies, the staff of this facility stayed by their posts - even when the rockets began to fall closer and closer to them.
And here are some pictures I took of Rambam from an overlook above Haifa.
So what does this have to do with entrepreneurship and start-ups?
In my mind it's simple.
When you have a culture where getting on the bus in the morning and going to work carries such a powerful risk - like potentially being blown up by a rocket or suicide bomber - the spector of failing at a start-up, I think, pales in comparison.
The people here - be they Israeli or Arab - have a sense of purposefulness about their day to day existence that keeps a rather healthy perspective on that which we sometimes take all too seriously back here in the cush and comfort of the US.
You know that whole thing about six degrees of separation?
Well, here in Israel that's more like .025 degrees.
As I mentioned in a previous post, I awoke this morning to a rather startling discovery. I had lost my voice.
But this wasn't one of those raspy, Lauren Bacall-sounding vocal issues, this was a flat out, phone rang, I picked it up, tried to speak and nothing came out. Not even a squeak. This was most distressing because I was due to speak on a panel at The Marker COM.vention in a few hours time.
What does this have to do with degrees of separation?
On further thought it's more like one degree of separation meets a strange game of telephone.
I called Brad Reddersen, the key point person for the TravelingGeek squad, to tell him of my dilemma and say that I'd be arriving at the conference a bit late as I wanted to try and salvage some voice for the panel.
He offered words of comfort, said I should call if I needed him to do anything, and that he'd see me later.
Thanks to a lengthy steam in the shower, buckets of hot tea with honey and a half pack of throat lozenges, I regained enough vocal capacity to head for the conference. And after a 20 minute taxi drive through the muggy morning I arrived.
That's when it began.
Conference organizer Nathan Lipson greeted me at the door, his arms open for a hug and a deeply concerned look upon his face
"Cathy, I heard you're sick? Are you okay? Can I do anything for you?
Smiling, I sidled up to him so as to avoid speaking too loudly and quietly whispered that I felt fine, just needed a bit of vocal rest, some more vocal hydration and I'd be ready to rock.
I headed for the conference cafe to hydrate, and had gone no more than 5-10 yards when I ran into Nimrod Kosklovski of PLYMedia.
He looked worried.
"Cathy, I heard you were sick. Are you okay?"
With a smile, I gestured that I'd merely lost my voice and was heading to get myself some tea. He smiled back. "Ah, a little too much singing at Kinnernet, eh? Well, let me know if I can get you anything."
I continued my walk to the tea concession, and had made it about another 5 yards when I ran into French investor, Marc Goldberg.
He looked worried.
"I heard you were really sick, Cathy. Are you okay?"
Again, I smiled, pointed to my throat and started to whisper that I'd lost my voice. Marc immediately offered to go and fetch tea for me.
I declined his gracious offer and made my way the remaining few yards to the table. In the time it took to get there, get the hot water, pick the tea bag and sort out whether I wanted honey or lemon no less than a dozen additional people stopped and inquired as to my health, offered to help with fetching beverages or lozenges and most all of them teased me about the fact that I - of all people - was rendered nearly mute.
This cavalcade of concern continued throughout the morning.
The part of this I found amusing - besides the part about Chatty Cathy being semi-silenced - was the fact that I'd made one call. I'd spoken with one person. And he was largely unconnected to most of those who said something to me. But somehow this one call propagated like a veritable conversational kudzu vine.
While amusing, it's actually not all that surprising. The truth is that this experience is a perfect example of the larger gestaldt that is Israel.
This is a country where it's not unusual for entire towns and cities and even the whole nation to go into mourning when someone dies. Because, more likely than not, you are merely one degree separated from them.
It's not just about its size, which is certainly a factor, it's about something far deeper. Because let's face it, there are places far smaller - cities like San Francisco for example - where people don't even know their next door neighbors.
In Israel, for as much conflict and contradiction as you find, there are equal and in some cases even greater aspects of connectedness with the history and the land, but also between the people. There's a sense of being in something together, almost a personal compact that living here is a team sport.
I do not mean to make light of the fact that there are serious chasms between cultural, religious and ethnic groups in this part of the world, but as with so many things the images and messages projected to the rest of the world lean heavily on all that is sensationalistic.
The truth is that, while there are unquestionable moments of drama and chaos, the day to day experience in Israel is a highly connected one.
Cathy's TravelingGeek Log: Back to Tel Aviv and on to The Marker COM.vention
After three days at Kinnernet I'd be lying if I didn't admit to being just slightly south of knackered.
However, my physical state runs in stark contrast to the utterly energized cycles of my brain right now. You see, I should be well in bed, getting rested for my session at tomorrow's Marker COM.vention.
But at the moment, I'm too excited to sleep. The last several days were - as is always the case with Kinnernet - deeply steeped in passionate discussions about art, society, technology and how all those things come together.
The idea behind Yossi Vardi's annual confab along the shores of the Sea of Galilee (known in Hebrew as "The Kinneret", thus the play on words with Kinnernet) is simple: talk about anything - except for business. The result is an incredibly engaging experience of meeting people - truly meeting them.
Here's one of the superb new friends I met. His name is Danny Litani. A serious player in the Israeli music scene, he was very excited about the idea of Seesmic. So, of course, I showed him. And during the demo a special guest dropped by.
There are myriad videos from Kinnernet that I'll be editing and posting here over the next several days, which will of course be in addition to the ongoing updates from the Innovation Mission on which The Traveling Geeks are embarking.
So stay tuned ... as a friend of mine said this afternoon as we sadly departed Kinnernet 2008, the end is really just the beginning ...
En Route to the Holy Land - A perspective for the Traveling Geeks
It's a land of contradiction - equal parts historic, economic, social, political and religious.
But no matter who you ask, most people would likely agree that the collective set of countries called the Middle East comprise one of the most fascinating - and conflicted - parts of the world. In particular, one of these countries elicits an immediate and almost visceral reaction from anyone of whom you might ask: "What do you think about Israel?"
Last week someone asked that very question on Seesmic. Actually the question that Kfir asked was: "What do you know about Israel?" Here is the query in his words:
It wasn't long before a wave of people responded. The discussion had intense moments - sharp discord and heated debate followed quickly by an interesting thing ... something that almost resembled detente.
Here are some of the posts from that thread:
Seth chimed in from NYC
Omer spoke up ... from Israel
Tom Sparks chimed in, and the heated discussion began
Ramzi, an Arab man living in the US continued on Tom's thoughts
Of course, I couldn't stay out of it
And Ramzi replied
And of course since Seesmic is a conversation, Kfir came back and chimed in again ... with a bit of surprise and gratitude:
I won't put the whole thread here as it went on for about 50 replies, (oh for the day when I can embed a threaded conversation from Seesmic ... it's coming SOON!) ... But I think the above give you the idea.
It's not as though this discussion uncovered a solution to what is, in essence, a centuries-old conflict. But it did, I believe, reflect a glimmer of what could ... might ... can be possible if there can be found a way through which the various factions can be brought to the table - to talk, to listen, to communicate.
If there's one thing I have learned from my relatively limited exposure to this part of the world, it is that as much as we in the padded comfort of the United States might think we know ... that is precisely how little we actually comprehend.
And so it is into this land of contradiction I now go - writing as I sit at 35,000 feet, whooshing at a comforting 596 mph (with a less than comforting outside temperature of -67 degrees Fahrenheit) heading for a 10-day adventure in the Holy Land.
One thing is certain ... it's going to be an interesting trip.
In the spirit of disclosure the original "creation" date on this would be more accurate if it mapped to the time I spent in Austin, TX for SXSW.
But as with so many things of this nature, I only just compiled the thoughts and am now writing in the dark cabin of my United flight winging my way across the Atlantic (a quick glance at the in flight map shows we're just passing over Greenland).
Yes, this has been marinating since SXSW - perhaps a credit to the superlative barbecue that one finds in Austin,TX. In any case its catalyst was a session at SXSW focusing on Muslim extremism on-line and how the moderate Muslim community is arising to combat the way in which the fundamentalist faction of their people is destroying the overall essence of their existence.
Okay, so that may be a gratuitous over-simplification, but the truth is that with a topic so ridiculously complex, I don't know that there's any other way I can break it down.
As with most of the sessions at SXSW, the dais was packed. I came in late so missed the introduction for most speakers. The ones I caught were:
Mohammed Hluchan - Senior Middle East Analyst for Verisign, iDefense
Frank Cilluffo - VP for Homeland Security at George Washington University
Mohammed Khan - Head of Hadithuna.com a "blog farm" dedicated to dispelling the myth that there is a monolothic Muslim community focused on a radical purpose
From a critical point of view, I think this session totally missed its potential. I, for one, went with the hope that the panelists would spent a little time talking about their perspective and then that we, in the audience, would have the chance to speak up, ask questions and get some dialogue moving.
This wasn't the case.
Instead the moderator allowed the panelists to each pontificate. Sadly the first two speakers each went on for about 15 minutes - leaving 30 minutes for the last four speakers and for Q&A. This does not discount the value and information provided by those first two speakers. Candidly I think each of these folks would have been well served by having a 30-minute session of their own to talk about their work, and then interact with the crowd.
But I digress from the point I intended, which is to focus on the fact that - as we are all sadly aware - the "bad guys" seem far more capable of motivating, organizing and mobilizing than those who strive to find balance and peace. Again, a drastic oversimplification, but you get the gist.
Why is it that the "good guys" (who, in my world, are defined as anyone who's not overly saturated in dogma and is willing to at least consider a point of view other than their own) seem constitutionally incapable of rising up against those small, but ever-so-vocal-and-powerful minorities?
It's that whole one bad apple spoiling the whole barrel thing. But here's the thing, we're not apples right? Last I checked, human beings aren't inanimate objects. We have moving limbs, opposable thumbs and have even been known on occasion to have cognitive reasoning and rational thought.
So why on earth can those who so deeply abhor all that is extremism not get their shit together and crush the venomous voices who, given a chance, would throw various societies into chaos merely for their own gain?
I do not point only to the Muslim community on this. We are all guilty at one point or another. How many times have you stood idly by while someone behaved in a way that you found reprehensible? How many times have you opted to stay silent rather than get involved because it's just not your business?
One cannot condemn the entire Muslim world any more than one can condemn all Germans for what happened during World War II. To categorize an entire people as evil and wrong based on the actions of a subset of that group, in my opinion, makes those who do the condemning no better than those who they judge.
This trip I am now taking to Israel has many meanings for me. I'll spend the first couple of days utterly immersed in all that is geek and tech. From there, it's suits and business talk at a conference. Beyond that, the intention is to spend several days riding around Israel with a group of Silicon Valley peers experiencing everything we can about innovation in the State of Israel.
Underneath this trip, though, for me lies a question: What will it take to galvanize the silent majority so that they step forward? How can we, as a social collective, support each other so that those who are afraid to speak out can feel safe? What role does the technology industry play in this equation and how might social media take part in healing some of these deep wounds?
Where do we begin?
My inaugural journey to Israel - an initiation of sorts
My first journey to Israel occurred in 1995 as part of a mission from my family's synagogue in Southern Florida - Boca Raton to be precise.
The tale of that journey is one I've not shared publicly. I've told some friends, but for the most part, I've kept it to myself.
Until now.
I hadn't intended to go on the trip. I was planning an extended adventure in Alaska. It was one of those fly-into-middle-of-Denali-in-bush-plane-hike-raft-through-wilderness-get-picked-up-on-other-side-in-bush-plane things. But after an array of family events, not the least of which was my father's recovery from a rather invasive Cancer surgery, I decided that shifting my trajectory was the right thing to do.
And so in June of 1995 I found myself on an El Al flight to Israel.
For the record, I'm Jewish. I was raised in what would probably be categorized as a fairly traditional, conservative household - synagogue on most weekends, Hebrew school, bat mitzvah - the whole nine yards.
Somewhere around my 14th birthday, though, I pretty much gave up on the whole religion thing. Truth is I rejected G-d and in the process ditched any and all thoughts about organized religion.
But that is a story for another day.
The relevant bit here is what happened to me on this mission in 1995.
Since I wasn't dialed in to the whole religious experience thing I figured I'd focus on my family and absorb as much of the incredibly rich regional culture as possible.
We landed at Ben Gurion at about 11am on a hot morning in late June. The airport still was rather small and so we deplaned via an outdoor stairway onto the tarmack.
Stepping from the chilled tube of airplane the sharply dry air hit like the gust from an open oven door. Things started off with a trip to plant trees. From there it was to the Haas Promenade for an across the valley view of the old city of Jerusalem. It's that view you've seen a million times. Stately walls, speckled with minarets and flags with the distinctive, shimmering gold Dome of the Rock at its center.
We went to our hotel, and after a good night's sleep we were off for a walking tour of the Old City of Jerusalem.
If you've never spent time in any ancient sort of city there is one thing that seems pretty universal about those locations. In ancient times, when a marauding army of one sort or another was coming in, the people who lived there would raze their city to the ground so as to leave nothing for the incoming troops to inherit. They'd have to build from scratch.
And so throughout lands with this deeply seeded history you have layer upon layer upon layer of cities built upon each other leaving stratifications of civilization to uncover.
Back in 1995 they were still in early-ish stages of excavating parts of the old city. One such dig was an amazing discovery of a literal city street - complete with homes and paved roads - that lay about 40-50 feet below the actual streets of the existing city.
From deep below the city we emerged to walk through street upon street of this magnificent history. Images of ancient times juxtaposed with those of modern day.
After several hours we emerged at the top of a stairway that looked over the plaza leading to the Western Wall. For the uninitiated this space is also sometimes called the Wailing Wall ... though I lean towards the former title as it feels ... well ... less maudlin.
It is common practice to write a note with a prayer on it and then insert it between the stones of the wall. At the time, a friend of mine was pregnant with her first child. It was a somewhat late pregnancy and so out of concern for her welfare and that of her baby, I wrote a note wishing for an easy delivery and a healthy child.
I finished writing my note and then started walking the 200 or so yard journey across the plaza to the wall itself. With my mother on my left and my sister to my right things were going simply enough.
And then suddenly it wasn't so simple.
About 20 yards along, I felt as though I'd walked into a wall of some sort. I can't explain it any other way than to say that it was as though a very strong wind - the kind you might experience walking down a city street in Chicago - kicked up and was pushing in my face, almost holding me still.
My mother and sister kept walking and it wasn't until they'd gone another 10 feet or so that they realized I was no longer with them. I'd frozen in place, clutching my note in one hand.
If my mother were able to raise one eyebrow, she'd most certainly have done so, but as it was she walked back up to me with a simple, "Cathy? Something wrong?"
It took me a minute but I managed to squeeze out some sort of response. I can't recall precisely what I said, but it was something along the lines of: "I can’t go there. I can’t go to that wall."
From here I'll truncate the story.
After about 10 minutes or so of taking my time to walk in what must have looked a bit like a toddler taking first steps, I found myself nose to stone with several thousand years of history.
The next cognitive moment I have took place nearly 15 minutes later. My forehead was against the wall. My arms were stretched wide with palms flat against the stone above my head. Tears poured from my eyes and I had this incredible, deep, warm sensation - as though I were wrapped tightly in a soft blanket.
There, in that moment, I found a connection to something far greater than myself.
Was it God?
I have no idea.
But what I do know is that each day after took on a richness and depth beyond anything I'd ever known.
The next time I stepped foot in Israel was in March 2007. Twelve years had passed and the country had changed ... a lot. Unlike my first journey, this next one was wholly business-focused, and while I went to some of the same places, it felt a bit detached and clinical.
That is not the case this time around.
Once again I fly all these miles for what is essentially a business-oriented journey to attend a few conferences and strengthen my professional acumen. But unlike last year, I find myself in a different role with this trip. The Israeli Consulate is graciously hosting a group of us to spend some time - meeting with entrepreneurs, talking with business people and looking into all that which is innovation in Israel.
That may seem like it's all business, but on some level this year I feel a deeper connection to the journey and am quite curious as to what that may bring.
It was merely a simple moment in which I found myself staring down some old insecurities that I'd thought long vanquished. (Funny how those things never really go away, they either morph to new form or sometimes hibernate for extended periods.)
In any case, in a weekend otherwise punctuated by incredible high points, I found myself mired in an emotional trough, flummoxed by the situation and feeling ... well ... frankly it was a bit unnerving.
My friend Beth, with whom I'd spent some time on Friday evening, sensed there was something up with me. She's good that way, Beth. Her sense of people is keen and she knows me better than many.
After a few email exchanges, Beth could sense that my Saturday was being spent in one of those not-so-great moods, and she called.
The conversation was brief, and as usual her perspective spot on.
And in that brief exchange I was reminded both of the power of friendship and the importance of not taking oneself too seriously.
Don't get me wrong, I'm ridiculously romantic and am quite keen on showering love and affection upon those I love - especially if there's a particularly special someone.
Personally I don't think that this should be focused on one day a year but should instead be a rather persistent state of any given relationship - but that's not the point of this post.
No, this post is about what happens when a well-intentioned but socially inept individual steps forward ... and puts his foot directly into his mouth.
It began in late January when I got a friend request on Facebook from a fellow named ... well ... let's call him Jon. His face looked familiar, but a quick scan of his profile and the fact that the three friends we had in common were not really close friends of mine led me to leave his request in the digital holding pattern of my friend request folder.
Fast forward to February 13. I'm at the SF New Tech Meet-up taking place at Mighty.
As I stood in deep conversation with some entrepreneurs, out of the corner of my eye I could see someone circling our group. I'm not one to break eye contact during a conversation, so I let it go.
A few minutes later, I stood at the bar waiting for a drink and catching up on some text messages. I felt someone standing next to me and looked up. It was the fellow who'd been circling my conversation.
"Hi," he said. "You look familiar have we met before?"
His face seemed familiar to me too, but I couldn't place it.
"No... I don't think so," I replied. "But you do look familiar."
We did the requisite card exchange and I saw his name ... Jon XXX.
Then I remembered.
He was the same fellow who'd sent me a friend request on Facebook a couple of weeks prior.
I mentioned this and commented that I'd not accepted the request because I couldn't place where we'd met. We chatted a bit and then the presentations began, so I excused myself to go watch.
Fast forward another 30 minutes and I'm back at the bar awaiting a fresh club soda and handling yet more text messages. Again the sensation of someone standing next to me.
I look up.
It's Jon XXX.
"Hi again," he said. "Enjoying the presentations?"
"Yes," I replied. And went back to the message to which I was responding. That probably wasn't very polite of me, but frankly I wasn't all that interested in talking with him. And on top of it, I had someone needing an answer right away.
As I continued typing, I realized he was still standing there, so I looked up again.
"May I ask you a non-business related question?" he asked.
I nodded.
"Well ... what are you doing for Valentine's Day?"
It seemed an odd question, and I wasn't sure how to reply so I just looked at him quizzically. Then he continued, "How about having dinner with me?"
Okay now you might say, WOW, that guy has courage, and how nice of him.
But to be perfectly honest I found it strange at best and creepy at worst. I mean, perhaps I should be flattered, but something about the whole thing gave me the heebie jeebies. Both because he so clearly lacked any sort of reasonable social aptitude to realize that this was weird and because between the Facebook request, the circling early in the evening and the two bar appearances, I felt stalked.
But then I started thinking about it. Was this just me? I mean ... I am, after all, a lesbian and so just not interested in dating men. If I were straight would I actually find this flattering?
Not having the right data set to make this analysis, I looked for some of my female friends at the event, and took an informal straw poll.
Response was overwhelmingly in favor of my initial reaction.
So what of this social ineptitude? And, more to the point, when someone errs on the side of improper behavior would it have been more appropriate to let him know that it was an out-of-line thing (in a kind, gentle way, of course), or do you just let someone continue their way through the social jungle without the proper tools for survival?
By definition (at least my definition) blogs should be interactive allowing readers to comment directly on the site - either in freely posted or blog writer-moderated mode.
You'll notice this functionality does not exist on this site.
You'll probably also notice that, for the most part, the writing here isn't necessarily of the ilk asking for a "so what do you think" response. This isn't to say that people wouldn't comment if given the opportunity, but when I set out to do this site it was largely an exercise in rediscovering my own voice and having a place to share my thoughts.
I did, however, have my superb designer build in the capacity for people to email me directly from this site, and over the years I have received occasional notes. Generally these consist of greetings and "how the hell have you been" notes from individuals with whom I'd lost contact and on some random meander of the Internet they found my site.
In recent months, the volume of these emails has increased - a fact which humbles me greatly as it means there are more of you fabulous people out there reading and based on the notes, it seems that my commentary and other postings are serving some purpose.
I'm also getting feedback from other places, more specifically from Facebook. I channeled the RSS feed for this commentary section into my Facebook profile and have found quite a few people are actually paying attention to what I have to say.
It seems that Facebook's impact on this site now has another angle.
I've gotten a request to write more on a specific subject.
Courage.
In my last commentary piece, I spoke about a rather unusual experience I had with the Honesty Box application on Facebook.
My thoughts after this Honesty Box experience were about courage - and the fact that it is far more simple to be brave when the implications of your actions are slim to none. It's kind of like the little dog on the leash that barks madly at the bigger dog when it walks down the street, but the minute that the larger one stops and turns, the more diminutive canine retreats behind its owner's legs.
I don't mean to imply that those who retreat from things that might be scary should be compared to yappy ankle-biters ... well, maybe I do a bit ...
Joking aside, I made some rather strong statements about my deciding to have a zero-tolerance policy for anyone who was not prepared to stand by their own words.
That makes me a total hypocrite.
You see, not too long after posting that commentary, I found myself perusing old posts one day. In doing so, I came across something that I wrote back on December 1, 2007. At least one person I know has suggested that I take this post down. They suggested that it's just too raw and personal. It is for that precise reason that I have decided to leave it there.
What, you may ask, about that makes me a hypocrite?
Simple.
That particular post is something that I wrote and posted on this site when I should have had the balls to just say it directly to the person about whom it's written. Or perhaps more accurate to say to whom it's written.
You see, I wrote that post telling myself that it didn't really matter whether or not that friend read it. I wrote that post, convincing myself that while there was a chance she might catch sight of it - we are, after all, connected on Facebook and so the post would end up in my profile and perhaps show up in her newsfeed - it didn't matter whether she did or didn't.
I was lying to myself.
I got the idea from an old practice I had many years ago. It had to do with an ex. That relationship was one fraught with drama and chaos. (And that also serves as the basis for another commentary on which I'm working now and hope to post in the next couple of days.) When that relationship ended there were many loose ends and raw emotions that continued to emerge months after our last contact. They were the type of feelings that needed to be processed, and while we were still at a point where I could have reached out and talked with her directly, doing so was inadvisable. (Mostly because any time we talked we ended up getting back together - briefly but disastrously.)
At a friend's suggestion, I wrote everything down and then put it into an envelope. I then addressed it to myself and put it into the mail. When it arrived back in my own mailbox, I burned it without opening. The mere act of hearing the mailbox clang somehow helped. The burning was a final purge.
In this digital age I thought this Web site could serve the same purpose but rather than sending thoughts out in an endless loop I could share them and in doing so offer others who might have had similar experiences some solace.
I told myself I was doing this for the greater good and it didn't matter if my friend read it.
I'm not sure who I was fooling - except maybe myself - but that was crap.
This friend and I haven't really spoken - actually we haven't spoken at all - since the events that transpired in November. There have been a few email exchanges in which the vague idea of getting together was tossed out. But nothing.
And so one day I updated my Facebook status and commented that I wished a certain friend had read something I wrote. A rather passive-aggressive move on my part that perhaps she'd see and be curious.
It was either that day or soon thereafter I got another note in my Honesty Box.
"I read it. Will you write more?"
There had been several posts to my site and to my various other online enclaves since that December 1 post, and so while in my heart I hoped that this note might just be from the person to whom I'd written, I was pretty sure it wasn't.
The next day, another note.
"Not all of us have your courage. Will you write more?"
I replied to the second note asking if they were the same person who'd already asked for me to write more. Because at least this clarified on what topic I was being asked to write.
No reply.
Then the next day, a new note that said:
"I am the same person."
This mystery woman and I have exchanged a few notes within Honesty Box about my writing on the subject. She has been quite gracious and complimentary. I told her that I'd write something and had promised it last week.
But I just couldn't get finger to keyboard - mostly, I think, because I feel as though my bravado has a pretty serious chink.
Of course that merely reflects being human and so isn't grounds for self-deprecation, but I do find myself re-evaluating my own sense of courage and wondering ...
As a rule, today's digitally dynamic world requires an acceptance of living one's life in an almost thoroughly transparent manner.
Put simply, if there's something you don't want people to know, it has become a conscious decision with considerable effort to keep it private. At least that's the case for folks such as myself whose carbon-based lives oftentimes sit in the shadow of our digital selves.
Of course, some might argue that the Internet is anonymous and that there are many people who hide behind the Web's ample skirts, refusing to show their faces either with the intention of embracing an alter ego or, as so sadly is often the case, to skulk in shadows so they can deliver nasty comments and criticism to others.
But for the most part, the on-line realm exists as place where all things are laid bare for any and all watchers. Some applications do exist, however, that offer an invisibility cloak of sorts, and it is thanks to such an application that I've had a rather amusing time of late.
Essentially this application allows you to send a completely anonymous note to anyone in Facebook. Well, not just anyone, really. You need to either be in their friend list or part of one of their networks.
The application goes like this:
You pick the person to whom you want to write the note.
You write the note
They get the note and have the option of replying.
The only way for the recipient to know from whom the note comes is for the sender to reveal themselves.
Here's the interesting part. Honesty Box color codes each note. If the sender is a male, it's highlighted in blue, and if the sender is female - you guessed it - it's highlighted in pink. This is based on the profile of the person who creates the note.
My story with Honesty Box begins a couple of days after this year's LeWeb3 conference. I opened up Facebook one day, and saw I had an Honesty Box note. It read:
"You are high in positive energy, and you infected me at LeWeb3. Thank you."
I wondered why someone would keep themselves anonymous for such a lovely sentiment, but didn't think much more beyond that.
The next day another note arrived. This one was a bit more interesting. It read:
"I kind of want to have sex with you."
And it was highlighted in pink.
So, of course I replied:
"Now there's something people don't get to hear very often. And a darn shame that is. In any case, provided the color coding identifiers in HB are accurate, at least your wish lies within the realm of viability. Of course, from there it depends on a couple of things..."
A day later, a reply:
"So what does it depend on?"
Putting aside the grammatical inaccuracy, I took the conversation one step further:
"Well, for starters, I don't mess around with anyone who's married or in a committed relationship. And then of course the attraction/interest needs to be mutual ... the determination of which would require knowing who this is..."
Then, radio silence.
It seems that the feeling of empowerment offered by the anonymous communication lost its steam when I stepped up and engaged.
Cutting to the chase and answering the questions that I can hear you asking as you read this:
Yes, I did actually find out who the person was who wrote the note.
No, I wasn't surprised by who it was (it was actually the person who I'd suspected from the get go.)
No we didn't have sex (although there was a nominal bit of fooling around).
It would seem that that is the end of the story, and it is certainly where the tale of my interaction with said woman comes to a close. But the experience left me thinking about the nature of this digital anonymity and how it's enabling people to go through life lacking one of the qualities that I treasure most - courage.
While I certainly don't consider myself a confrontational sort, I would say that when push comes to shove I tend to step up and face situations rather than walk away.
Taking ownership - of your feelings, of your actions - is hard. And as I look at 2007 in the rear view mirror and look forward to 2008 I have come to the decision that moving forward I shall strive to be brave and shall not tolerate those who fail to do the same.
I admit it. When it comes to media consumption I'm really rather old-fashioned.
Strange to say, perhaps, for someone who logs into email and checks her RSS feeds before pouring her morning coffee, but in spite of my digitally saturated information existence, I retain a strong connection to the actual printed word.
You see, though I've cut back substantially on the number of hard copy subscriptions I receive, my mailbox still ends up stuffed on a regular basis.
For starters there's my daily addiction to The New York Times. Yes, I know I can get it all on-line, but my dirty little secret is that I LIKE reading a daily paper. I like the feel of newsprint. I like the crinkly whoosh of turning the page as I quietly guzzle my morning coffee.
If it were just the paper it might not be a problem, but my penchant for periodicals includes the regular arrival of Business Week, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair and Portfolio with the occasional newsstand purchase of any number of other glossy gems.
Problem is, who has time to read them all?
The good news is that my incessant need for exercise means that there's a 45 minute window at least five days a week during which I'm shackled to the elliptical at the gym. And so goes my consumption of Business Week.
But the rest lay quietly in a pile ... until I travel.
And this is where my chiropractor's support of my print addiction comes in.
When I hit the road for a trip - as I often do - the stack of magazines gets swept up, stuffed into my carry-on and toted along. The good part is that my bag is lighter on the way home. The bad news is that I generally arrive to my destination walking in a posture that mildly resembles Marty Feldman in Young Frankenstein.
This letter has been several weeks in the writing - mostly because the earlier versions were laced a bit heavily with vitriol. So as with things of this nature I opted to cool off.
Now with a few weeks behind me I felt that I would do the mature thing ... write you via this site because based on your blowing me off the last time I tried to talk with you, I figure that a direct attempt to talk would probably fail anyway.
November 17, 2007. It was a lovely evening that got a little strange.
Perhaps it was the Pinot.
Perhaps it was the barely perceptible undulation of the ship on the Bay.
More likely it was the Pinot.
But whatever the case, you made it pretty clear that kissing me was a mistake.
You penned a multi-paragraph mea culpa laden with guilt saying (I'll paraphrase here) you were horrified by your intoxication because there's no way you'd have kissed me otherwise. You expressed concern that your behavior had jeopardized our friendship.
Reading your email made me sad. Not so much because you were so obviously horrified at your actions, but because you felt so guilty. I mean, it's not as though you were the only one involved.
Last I checked, I was there too. And while you're a good looking so-and-so, and I may have had a bit to drink myself, it's not as though I was rendered incapable of fending you off.
No, actually the thing that caught me off guard was less about your pushing me up against the bar and kissing me, and more about the fact that it somehow felt rather normal. I'd be lying if I didn't admit to noticing that beyond the wit, brains and dryly sarcastic humor is a sexy, beautiful woman; but we're friends and so the whole physical thing wasn't something on my mind with relation to you.
That might have been a different story about a year ago, because when we first met I wondered whether there might be something there. But you were clearly still taken - if not physically then emotionally and spiritually - by your last relationship. Whether it was that or that you just weren't interested, it became quite clear quite quickly that friendship was to be our path. And a good path it was.
But that's neither here nor there, because whether this was nothing more than a mortifying drunken indiscretion or an indication of something else becomes irrelevant in the shadow of your actions afterwards. You said you were sorry. You said you were hoping that you hadn't ruined our friendship. You asked if I wanted to talk over dinner.
And then you blew me off.
You may not have seen it that way, but looking at the progression of events, the message you sent me to me was that in spite of your seemingly heartfelt concern, whether or not our friendship was damaged didn't really matter to you.
Now I realize that in any situation there are three realities. There's what I see. There's what you see. And then there's the actual thing that happened.
So from my perch, here's how things went:
You sent your apology email.
I called but got your voice mail and tried leaving you a message. It wouldn't let me record so I sent you a quick text.
About an hour later you replied, said you'd call me later and asked if I wanted to talk over dinner or tea.
I replied, said yes and that I'd be around. That was around 2:00pm on Sunday.
Then radio silence from you - until noon on Monday at which point I received a rather casual message.
You'd gone hot-tubbing.
You fell asleep early.
Things were crazy with work and we should get together after the holidays.
I'm not sure what part stung most - your failure to acknowledge that you'd left me hanging, the fact that your sense of concern was so transitory ... or that you chose to reach out using the public wall of my Facebook profile.
Not a phone call. Not a text. Not an email. Heck not even a private message in the social network, but a public wall post.
I'm not sure what's up with that, or whether I should take that as an insult. But it sure felt like one.
Then, on Thanksgiving, a brief text message offering happy Thanksgiving blessings and your hope that I was having a lovely day.
And since then, radio silence again.
Frankly I was going to forget about the whole thing, figuring that I should probably just write things off. But on Friday night I ran into my friend Megan. She was there the night of the party, and she asked me what was up with you.
A terrible sadness washed over me, and mini-tempest whirled in my chest. Megan's expression shifted to concern and she asked what happened.
That's when a tear rose in my eye - because I couldn't answer her.
I don't deal well with uncertainty, but I deal even less well with rejection, and so it is for that reason I cannot bring myself to reach out again to try and talk to you.
So I post my thoughts here, along with the hope that we'll reconnect at some point and rather than sweeping this under the rug we'll be able to sort things through.
In your apology email you said you hoped I could forgive you and that we could move on.
I did, and we can, but whether that happens or not is now up to you.
Why is it that the more technologically advanced society becomes, the more socially retarded people seem to be?
Or is it just that with the pervasive nature of interconnectedness I'm just now exposed to a hell of a lot more people and in that increased volume it's inevitable that ratio of poorly behaved folks rises?
Whatever the case, I'm hoping that the latest interaction I've had is merely a case of social ineptitude ... and not a stalker.
It began with my cell phone ringing at a ridiculously early hour.
Okay, so 8:00am isn't all THAT early, but it is a Saturday after all.
In any case, I look at the caller ID and see a strange country code. 91.
Wait a second ... that's INDIA!?
Now a friend of mine from Seesmic (the unsinkable "Pistachio") happens to be in India right now ... But I couldn't imagine that she'd be calling.
So I let it go to voice mail.
Then it rang again.
And again.
And again.
No voice mails were left, so I figured it was merely some VoIP spam from a call center somewhere in Bangalore.
That's when the text message arrived.
"Is this Cathy? I'm trying to find you and link as friend."
Weird.
Now it bears mentioning that in my line of work I interact with people from all over the world as a matter-of-course. The requests come in with steady frequency from LinkedIn, Facebook, Skype, Twitter and so forth. Between people whose grasp of English is limited to the challenges of colloquial variations, I've learned that it's important to scrape the surface a bit on some communications to ascertain what, precisely, someone might mean.
So I replied:
"Yes, this is Cathy. Who are you?"
And that's when I got a series of texts that were really strange.
First he tells me that he's a 39 year old guy in India, that he found me on Mobiluck and here's his email address and won't I write him to be his friend.
Again, this isn't really the weird part, because people reach out to near and complete strangers from the digital ether all the time trying to connect and make friends - that's part of the amazing and wonderful thing that is the Internet and Social Media.
But the persistence of the initial effort by phone followed by the text just weirds me out.
For people who choose to live their lives in the public eye, there comes a level of scrutiny and expectation that most people never face.
It's true that in today's world more and more people are opting to live their lives out loud with social networks, YouTube, Twitter and newcomers like Seesmic providing anyone with the emotional fortitude (or total lack of discretion as the case may be) the means to splay their lives open sharing every aspect of their existence with whomever wishes to read, listen or watch.
But I'm not talking about that kind of public eye.
What I'm talking about are the people whose life path puts them squarely into positions where their actions, words and deeds serve as guidance, motivation and inspiration for others on a macro scale. For the purpose of this discussion, I'm talking about people in the entertainment business - actors, musicians and the like - though the same could be said for authors, politicians and athletes.
It can't be easy. You walk out of your house to get a quart of milk, and you're confronted by people who've seen all of your films, read all of your books, watched all of your concerts and they feel that they know you. After all, you've shared a personal side of yourself through your work, and to them you have been an intimate part of their life.
And from that one way intimacy people often expect that should they ever meet someone for whom they are a fan, that this person will look into their eyes and recognize them. That at first glance you'll be welcomed with open arms and a "Hello friend, how ARE you?"
Of course that's ridiculous.
But how many times have you heard people tell stories of disappointment from meeting someone they idolize in some way? How many times have you heard someone say: "Oh I met so and so, and boy was he/she an asshole."
Well, what if you met them on a bad day? What if you somehow created the problem by approaching them inappropriately? Whatever the case, when our anticipation is dashed, it can be very disheartening.
I remember meeting Bernadette Peters when I was about 16 years old. I was a huge fan, and I met her in between rehearsals for her show at a casino hotel in Atlantic City, N.J. I'd been doing musical theater since I was about 7 and she was one of my favorite performers. So when she blew me off with dismissive wave and turned her back - I was devastated.
Of course, I realize now that she was probably exhausted, worn out from travel and trying to nail her show down before that night's opening and just didn't have time to say hello. Now could she have done it a bit more politely, perhaps. But suffice to say, it's not as though I think she's a horrid person. Many years later my friend Lisa Vroman performed with Bernadette in a show. I was pleased to find out that not only was my initial impression wrong, but based on what Lisa told me of working with her, she was a truly generous performer with an intense focus on perfection. And I'm guessing that my boisterous greeting all those years ago was precisely the type of jarring disruption that she didn't need.
But even having this clear view of reality, and in spite of the fact that I'm blessed to do the kind of work that puts me squarely in the path of some pretty amazing people on a regular basis, I'm still human. And there is a very special list of people in whose presence I'm pretty sure that I would revert to childhood and become a tongue-tied, pre-teen complete with shuffling feet, downcast eyes and deeply ferocious blushing.
Actually in the case of one person on my celebrity crush list I can tell you for fact that this was precisely the case.
If you're not gay and specifically not a lesbian, then you may not have heard of the film Desert Hearts. It is 1986 film based on the Jane Rule novel "Desert of the Heart." I hadn't heard of it either, at least not until I came out at the age of 28. It was during those early days of figuring out my sexuality that I made many a foray to the video store (back in the pre-Netflix era when people still did that) seeking out films that went beyond the usual John Hughes fare upon which I'd been weaned and spoke more directly to some of the experiences I was having.
So it wasn't until some time in the late 90s that I saw the film and first laid eyes on Patricia Charbonneau.
One of the two female leads in the film, she was captivating.
Okay, I'll say it, she was ridiculously smoking hot.
Going beyond that, there was something so delicately balanced about her performance, something that on a number of levels spoke to some of the struggles I was facing with my own attempt to get comfortable in my own skin. I found myself comforted ... and over the years I found myself returning to the film each time catching a fresh nuance of characters and perspective on the story - and of course stoking the fire of my schoolgirl crush.
Fast forward to the spring of 2007. The 20th anniversary Desert Hearts DVD release approached and I caught sight of a notice on the Internet that there was a DVD signing scheduled for the Virgin Megastore on Sunset Blvd. in Los Angeles.
All I wanted, I told her, was a picture of Patricia and maybe an autograph.
Lisa hit the ball out of the park - and it went something like this.
On the day of the signing I headed for an event in San Francisco. One of those technology industry networking things where I had to smile a lot, hand out business cards and talk incessantly about the latest widgets and hottest start-ups.
I was contemplating departure, when my cell phone rang. It was Lisa.
"Hey Cathy. I'm here at the signing. I've been here a while and the line is almost done, so I'm going to get in line and when I get to the front I'm going to hand Patricia the phone."
That's when I almost passed out.
As Lisa gave me the running commentary, describing how Patricia was interacting with people, and counting down how many people were ahead of her in line, I dashed out of the networking event and headed for my car - babbling like a fool the entire time.
"Oh my god ... what the hell am I going to say to her? I feel like an ass. I mean, I have so many questions and things I'd love to discuss with her but it's more of a 'wish I could sit down and chat over lunch' sort of thing. Oh shit."
My anxiety gave Lisa great amusement.
And then the time came.
It was slightly muffled, but I heard Lisa's introduction:
"Hi Patricia, I'm pretty sure that I have one of your biggest fans on the other end of the phone. It's my friend Cathy in San Francisco. Would you mind saying hello?"
And then I heard that velvety voice saying my name.
My first words?
Oh, I was at my utmost eloquent.
"Er ... um ... oh ... it's you ... oh ... um ... hi ... wow ... um ... say, might you hold on a second, while I pull over. I think I might hit a light pole."
Talk about verbal alacrity.
She could not have been more gracious. Clearly sensing a wholly freaked out person on the other end of the line, Patricia gently asked me where I was.
"San Francisco?" she said. "I love San Francisco. It's a lovely city."
With a moment or two of chit-chat, I soon felt far more at ease.
We talked a bit about her role in Desert Hearts. I complimented her bravery at having tackled such a controversial role at such an early juncture in her career.
I told her that putting aside the fact that she's remarkably beautiful, that I was truly impressed by her work and thought it was a true crime that she'd not been around much. And I put in a plea for her to get back on the screen soon.
With that, the conversation was over. And I was floating.
The next day Lisa sent me a picture that she'd taken of Patricia while we were talking on the phone.
A week or so later, a package arrived in the mail for me from Lisa. Inside was a copy of the 20th anniversary Desert Hearts CD. It was signed by director/producer, Donna Deitch, Patricia's co-star Helen Shaver and, of course, by Patricia. She'd written, "It was great talking with you, Cathy. Take care, Patricia."
Fast forward again. This time it's October 2007 and I'm talking with another dear friend, Mariah Hanson, about the upcoming PowerUp benefit. She encourages me to come to LA for the soiree. I agree.
It's not until about a week before the event that I actually take the time to read through the flyer in any detail and see that Donna Deitch was to be honored.
And Patricia Charbonneau was scheduled to be there.
Oy.
Things were actually fine up until it was time to get dressed to head for the event. That's when lightly flapping butterflies in my stomach evolved quickly into a flock of something with far wider wingspan ... pterodactyls perhaps.
I'm already belaboring the story far too much so I'll cut to the chase. Yes, I approached Patricia after she arrived at the event. And yes, I mentioned our phone chat from early in the summer. I'm pleased to say that she remembered it! And with a bashful grin, I asked if she would be so kind as to allow a picture, to which I'm also pleased to report she graciously agreed.
Gracious. That's really the key word here. Here I was, confronted with meeting someone who - unbeknown to her - had played a critical role in my life. Her portrayal of Cay inspired and touched me in a deeply personal way at a time when, like her character, I was wrestling between the pull of fierce independence and the deep desire to belong. And when faced with my somewhat bumbling bashfulness, Patricia could not have been more compassionate and warm.
Since appearing in Desert Hearts, Patricia's screen time hasn't exactly been what one would call prolific. There have been a number of films and some TV appearances, but for the most part this striking and talented actress has spent the better part of the last 20 years well outside the Hollywood scene. There's very little about her personal life published anywhere, but I can't help but wonder if it has something to do with the fact that her film debut placed her as an out lesbian during a time when that sort of thing just wasn't done. That may well be the case. But I'm guessing that it's largely a function of her focusing on an even more important role - that of being mother to her two kids.
Whatever the reason, Patricia Charbonneau is an actress whose face should grace far more screens than it does today. Because being a role model and someone to whom people look takes far more than just good looks and talent - it requires grace and a sense of awareness and responsibility for what comes with the public role.
The morning dawned sharp and cool in San Francisco. Yesterday's rains left behind a crystal clear dawn and crisp scent of fall in the air. Knowing I was heading for overcast skies and showers in LA made it a bittersweet trip to the airport, but one thing gave me a sense of joy about the whole thing.
It meant I would have time to read my entire Sunday New York Times.
Navigating Sunday AM traffic was a breeze, and the parking situation was simple. I even got to security only to find a few people in front of me.
I knew the morning would go well.
Grabbing coffee at the overpriced Peet's Coffee stand by my gate, I slipped eagerly into a chair in the gate area and slipped the bright blue plastic from my paper.
And that's when the glistening sunshine slipped behind a cloud.
Staring at me from the front page was the news of Norman Mailer's death.
Now of course he was 84 years old and lived a rather full life by many standards, but just knowing that this powerful and prolific voice was now silent gave me pause.
The Times tribute (far more than an obituary, as you can read here), was definitely one of those that I learned about in Journalism school and even participated in writing as a cub reporter - the canned obituary.
It's common practice for media organizations to prepare lengthy tomes and tributes to famous people who are getting up there in age. That's how it's so easy to slam them out into print as soon as the news hits.
This particular item, I must say, wasn't very well written. It was meandering and seemed poorly organized, but there was one point that caught my attention.
Very early in his writing career Norman Mailer made a commitment to write 3,000 words every day. Paraphrasing the article (which paraphrased Mailer) this was his way to get out "all the bad writing".
I'd say that he did a good job.
While I don't know that I have the literary fortitude (or the discipline, frankly) to make such a commitment, I am going to promise to post at least a few words every day ... I know. I know. I've said that here before, but in the last week I've been really good about posting some multimedia content here, and intend to continue that trend. And so in the interest of making sure that this site stays balanced, I will be tossing some words up too.
Considering his start came with writing that highlighted World War II, it seems somehow fitting that he should pass on the eve of Veteran's Day.
And so on the occasion of this great writer's death, I take a moment and think about his commitment to language, his commitment to telling truth and in turn renew my commitment to try and uphold the standard that writers like he so graciously and powerfully held aloft.
I spent every summer growing up "down the shore" in New Jersey. Ventnor, NJ to be specific.
(For you board game aficionados, that would be the yellow section of the Monopoly board, between Ventnor and Atlantic avenues mere blocks from Marvin Gardens. And for those of you more geographically inclined, exit 2 of the Turnpike.)
So when I awoke to a note this morning from my friend Chris Shipley that pointed me to a site related to my Pinelands stomping grounds, I was amused.
Don't get me wrong. I loved my summers there. Hell, my dad was FROM New Jersey (went to Atlantic City High School, back in the days when people actually grew up and lived in this seaside community). But generally it's the much maligned state that acts as the punchline of a joke for the Northeastern corridor.
In any event, it pleases me to see that in the wake of The Sopranos leaving the air, and the resurgence of Bruce Springsteen as a great rock idol, that New Jersey is getting its game on!
What I neglected to discuss in my post about Archie was the chaos that roiled the human component of my family during that time.
The morning of September 15 as I wrestled with the specter of euthanasia for Archie, my phone rang. It was my sister.
"You need to come to Florida," she said. "Mom needs to have open heart surgery."
My mother, whose last visit to the doctor was for my birth in 1968, had gone into the hospital the day before with some serious breathing issues and chest pain. The doctor had kept her overnight for morning tests.
In any case, I asked my sister the logical question.
"When?"
"Today," she replied.
My mind went immediately to Archie in his cage at the vet's office - clinging to life and fighting to live. I told my sister that so long as he was breathing I would have to stay in California. Even if he came home from the vet, he'd be in no shape to travel and I wasn't going to leave him.
Part of me thinks that this is in part why Archie let go when he did. It was, in a way, his ultimate last gift to me in a 10-year relationship filled with his unconditionally providing for my emotional needs.
Archie passed that afternoon and I made my arrangements to head for Florida.
Needless to say I was devastated and barely in control of my emotions, but upon arrival in Florida I had to slap on a happy face and bury my pain. Breaking down in front of someone who's just had major heart surgery isn't such a good idea.
There was ample mishegoss during the week (as there always is with my family). My brother had major surgery (a story for another post) and of course all of this transpired just before Rosh Hashana, and my sister was expecting 13 people for dinner on Friday and 20 for lunch the following day. And we were doing all the cooking.
And so the week went: Driving to Fort Lauderdale to visit mom. Driving to Miami to see my brother. Racing to the market for cooking supplies. Standing in the kitchen deciphering kosher cookbooks. And all the time weeping uncontrollably in between.
Such a lovely time it was.
And the only thing that made me feel better was looking at pictures online of puppies.
It was during one of these canine cavalcades that I came upon a site called Next Day Pets. It's kind of an aggregation site where people who have pets to sell - from average folks needing to get rid of a pet to high-end breeders - can list their animals from dogs and cats to other more exotic species. For the dogs you can sort by pretty much any breed. I'd already thought about getting a second dog (someone to keep Archie company) and had been toying with the idea of a Labradoodle.
Since I couldn't even look at the face of a Wheaten without hyperventilating I perused the pups of mixed Poodle and Lab descent. I figured I'd learn a bit about the breed and see if I could find some people whose puppies might merit a closer look when I was more ready to bring another puppy into the house in a couple of months.
Then I saw him.
It was a picture with a lawn chair and this little black pup had his paws on the cushion and was gazing up through the armrest with eyes I recognized. It was the same look Archie used to give me - just when he'd done something wrong and knew he needed to suck up.
A few emails later and I was on the phone with the breeder.
NOTE TO READERS: In March 2008 I received several a couple of emails from people regarding the breeder from whom I received Truman. Both pointed me to stories accusing the breeder of ... well, for lack of a better description, unethical breeding practices. One person had gotten a puppy from her. The other was a veterinary technician. I must say that in my extensive research on this breeder nearly two years ago, I found no evidence of such things. And my experience with her has been stellar - not to mention the fact that Truman is healthy and happy. That being said, based on the accusations, and the proof provided to me, I am opting to remove any and all reference to her name or kennel from my site. I will refrain from any further action, but feel that in light of the information I have received at this point, I can no longer vouch for her or recommend her as a breeder.
It was about two minutes into our chat when I began to weep. I told her the story of losing Archie and the experience I was having at the moment with my family.
"I'm a horrible person, how can I think about getting a new puppy now? My dog's bed isn't even cold yet. What if I'm making a big mistake?"
Her response was a balm for my raw nerves and a comfort to my broken heart.
She shared her own story of losing her "soulmate" dog several years earlier and how merely weeks later when another puppy came into her life she thought the same thing ... and that dog is now her shadow. After sharing her story, she then also told me a bit about Truman (whose name at the time was Spike), and said that based on just the bit I'd shared, she was pretty sure that he'd be a match.
And then she offered the most gracious thing of all.
"Look Cathy, if you connected with this puppy just by the picture, you owe it to yourself and him to see. If it doesn't work and it's really not a fit, I will take him back. The most important thing to me is my pups' happiness, and I know you will be a wonderful parent to him."
One month later I drove to San Francisco International Airport's cargo bay to pick up my new furry child.
It's now just a bit over a year since that fateful day, and the dog now known at H.S. Truman Brooks has proven himself a most worthy successor to Archie.
There are moments when I think of Archie, when he comes into my mind so strongly I look around half expecting to see him come trotting up. It's generally in those moments, when I catch sight of Truman nearby that I realize that may just be Archie's paw guiding me as a reminder that even when we lose someone important or a deeply connected relationship ends, there will always be another soul nearby to help soften the blow and cushion your heart.
It's on nights like tonight that it hits me particularly hard.
It's late and I was going to step outside with Truman for his pre-bedtime constitutional. The front door of my building is a heavy one - my building being one of those early 1920's Edwardian sorts that's so prevalent in San Francisco.
First the low squeak of the hinge, then a nearly silent whoosh as it swung back, and then I caught it - that unmistakable scent ...
There's nothing like living near the ocean. Granted I can't see it from my window - not unless you count the teensy sliver of bay that, on clear days, I can see between two high rises to the south - but the ever-present sense of sea wraps around me daily, just as it edges San Francisco on three sides.
Recently I made a trip to San Francisco City Hall. It was time to renew my consulting business license. I stood in the City Collector's office and stared at the towering photograph stretching about 10 feet across the wall. It was an aerial shot of the San Francisco skyline taken from somewhere above the Bay Bridge, circa 1963.
Besides the conspicuous absence of now iconic images like the Transamerica Pyramid, the Embarcadero Center and AT&T Park, it was shocking to see just how much of the waterfront area at that time was dedicated to shipping and warehouses - a city living from the sea.
Not any more. Now San Francisco is largely an information economy town. As the northern civilized anchor to the digital breadbasket of Silicon Valley, San Francisco's bread and butter comes from technology. There is still a vibrant waterfront, but one that is largely now landscaped with terraced stone benches sporting weird brackets in the shape of sea creatures designed to both decorate ... and dissuade skateboarders.
Every day people trundle to their buses, cars and trains heading for offices where they toil merrily (or not so). At day's end - especially in summer months when the fog comes in - they retreat from their cubicle cages to some other location to while a few hours before starting it again.
How many people take the time before or after engaging in that work to take a moment and pull in a deep drink of that cool sea-tinged air? How many people are so disconnected from their environment that they can't catch that scent as is wafts past them on their way to work, to the market, to get the kids at school?
I stood in my old Muckrakers softball jersey and sweatpants, silky cold marble of the front steps under my feet, waiting as Truman took his tree-side stroll. Slightly humid air with a cool whoosh of air passed. Truman returned, but I remained still, long swallows of the briny scent filling my lungs, wishing that instead of heading back inside and up the elevator that I had a hammock or Adirondack chair so that I could fall asleep wrapped in the downy comfort of the sea.
It's said that imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. Frankly I think that complimenting someone directly has a bit more sincerity to it, but that's just me.
In this case, I found myself intrigued by an application that a friend posted to her MySpace page.
And so with credit going to SM for introducing this, I share a little test with you here, along with my results ...
You strive to please others and compromise anyway you can.
War or conflict bothers you, and you would do anything to keep the peace.
You are a good mediator and a true negotiator.
Sometimes you do too much, trying so hard to make people happy.
While you keep the peace, you tend to be secretly judgmental.
You lose respect for people who don't like to both give and take.
On the flip side, you've got a great sense of humor and wit.
You're always diplomatic and able to give good advice.
Souls you are most compatible with: Warrior Soul, Hunter Soul and Visionary Soul
Read It!!!
Read this today and don't delete it if you are too busy!!
You'll see.
The ever-present email chain letters. In our digital age they have become, well, no more than yet another junk mail message slapped into the in-box. More often than not I just delete them, but every now and again I've forwarded my fair share. The message of this one though, I thought merited a more permanent location for reading and so I've posted it here ...
Because let's face it, there's more bullshit perpetuated by email these days than anything else - especially bogus chain letters. The good news is that this email doesn't ask for anything. You don't need to send any money. You don't need to buy or sell anything. Those are the ones that really cause trouble - especially since in pretty much every case they're a bunch of hogwash. It pays in any case when you get something strange by email - even if sent by someone you know - that you check it out. Some great sites exist to debunk all sorts of emailurban legends and myths.
This, however, doesn't ask for anything. Well, it asks that you forward it to 7 friends, but I figure by posting it here at least that many will read it so I've done my part.
The other challenge is that in today's digital age someone may well get pissed that I've cribbed their words without crediting them. But since the email thread doesn't indicate from whence it began, I'll merely say that it was sent courtesy of my Uncle Billy Share who lives in Southern Florida.
The theme of this message to me falls into the same vein as my most recent experiences with digital connectivity. All too often the same technology that allows us to do more things, more quickly and more efficiently keeps us running at high speed and with blinders on.
That is, until something hits you upside the head ...
With that, I offer this:
THE BRICK
A young and successful executive was traveling down a neighborhood street, going a bit too fast in his new Jaguar. He was watching for kids darting out from between parked cars and slowed down when he thought he saw something. As his car passed, no children appeared. Instead, a brick smashed into the Jag's side door! He slammed on the brakes and backed the Jag back to the spot where the brick had been thrown.
The angry driver then jumped out of the car, grabbed the nearest kid and pushed him up against a parked car shouting, "What was that all about and who are you? Just what the heck are you doing? That's a new car and that brick you threw is going to cost a lot of money. Why did you do it?"
The young boy was apologetic. "Please, mister ... please, I'm sorry but I didn't know what else to do," he pleaded. "I threw the brick because no one else would stop."
With tears dripping down his face and off his chin, the youth pointed to a spot just around a parked car. "It's my brother," he said. "He rolled off the curb and fell out of his wheelchair and I can't lift him up."
Now sobbing, the boy asked the stunned executive, "Would you please help me get him back into his wheelchair? He's hurt and he's too heavy for me."
Moved beyond words, the driver tried to swallow the rapidly swelling lump in his throat. He hurriedly lifted the handicapped boy back into the wheelchair, then took out a linen handkerchief and dabbed at the fresh scrapes and cuts. A quick look told him everything was going to be okay.
"Thank you and may God bless you," the grateful child told the stranger. Too shook up for words, the man simply watched the boy push his wheelchair-bound brother down the sidewalk toward their home.
It was a long, slow walk back to the Jaguar. The damage was very noticeable, but the driver never bothered to repair the dented side door. He kept the dent there to remind him of this message: "Don't go through life so fast that someone has to throw a brick at you to get your attention!" G-d whispers in our souls and speaks to our hearts. Sometimes when we don't have time to listen, He has to throw a brick at us. It's our choice to listen or not.
Read on ...
If God had a refrigerator, your picture would be on it.
If He had a wallet, your photo would be in it.
He sends you flowers every spring.
He sends you a sunrise every morning.
Send this to every "beautiful person" you wish to bless.
God didn't promise days without pain, laughter without sorrow, sun without rain, but He did promise strength for the day, comfort for the tears, and light for the way.
Read this line very slowly and let it sink in ...
If God brings you to it, He will bring you through it.
Pass this message to seven people except you and me.
The other day I commented on the bittersweet irony of the fact that recognition of my birthday came largely through digital reminders from various and sundry on-line services. I went pretty much the entire day without even so much as a handshake in recognition of the day.
It bears mentioning that on one or two occasions during the day, I did consider that maybe the failure of my colleagues (one of whom is actually one of my closest friends) to proffer so much as a passing felicitation might be due to a surprise huzzah later in the day did cross my mind. But since I'm rather hard to catch off guard the idea that anyone who knows me would attempt a surprise greeting doesn't really compute.
So I'd pretty much resigned myself to the smattering of emails, and the trickle of voice mails from back home.
Then the trickle gathered some speed.
By evening's end I found myself at a late night reception for the Guidewire Group conference Innovate!Europe (the reason that I'm in Spain in the first place). While sidled up to my friend David Sifry, he said: "So is it true that today's your birthday?"
No sooner had a responded with a nod, than David raised his voice and called the room to attention, and then led them through a rousing rendition of Happy Birthday. The warmth in the room (along with the myriad well-wishes) quickly dissolved the digital distaste from earlier in the day.
And it turned out that upon going to sleep perhaps I should have turned off the ringer in my cell phone; because no sooner had I laid my head to sleep than the phone began to ring with well-wishes from friends back in the States who were unaware of my global travel this week.
Fast forward to the next evening when I sat among about 100 or so of the attendees from the conference at the gala dinner for Innovate!Europe, and just as the last plates of dinner were removed and dessert began to arrive, I felt one of the servers standing behind me. Looking up, I saw a delectable Zaragozan pastry topped with a candle held aloft behind me ... I have to say you haven't really experienced a birthday song until you've heard it warbled by a chorus of voices laced with accents from at least a half-dozen countries.
The lesson in all this?
Pretty simple really.
Beyond the fact that one should not be quick to leap to conclusions, I think it's important to realize that in this day and age when we move so quickly (especially in the US), and we expect instant gratification from so many things that we need to be mindful that the carbon-based computer that is human needs a bit more processing time.
Giving people the space to step forward is as important as making sure that one stays personally engaged and present.
Here I sit, thousands of miles from home, on the day that marks my entry to this earthly plane, and the only greetings that I've received have been those sent automatically from various and sundry automated services.
There's been one human greeting - from my big brother, who proffered a humorous humming of the traditional birthday tune, tagged with a warm greeting for best wishes on this day.
But the rest of them ... all from the land of ones and zeros.
It's possible that there are some old-fashioned birthday cards jammed into my mailbox back home, and the fact that it's right now only 7am back in California could possibly be contributing to the lack of felicitations, but besides the fact that I'm here in Spain with several people who are purportedly close friends it feels rather hollow that the only greetings have come either from casual acquaintances who must have plugged my birthday into their contact managers, or sites where I have membership.
Talk about depressing.
Frankly I don't have an issue with getting older, but doing so and feeling alone, now that truly stinks.
It's to be expected, I suppose, that in a city known as a place of great understanding and openness, that few things are clearly defined. From political views to sexual preference, everything in San Francisco seems to be on a wide-ranging scale of shades.
So it's funny to me that when it comes to the weather, that things here are so terribly abrupt. Many may disagree and say that San Francisco is mostly the same year round with temperatures ranging around the 60s no matter the season.
There are no true seasonal shifts as you find in places like New England (or anywhere else in the Northeastern United States for that matter). In those places, each season winds down and then shape-shifts into the next usually marked by glorious color and slowly morphing temperatures.
Here in San Francisco though the changes are abrupt with seasons coming upon you like a Mack truck moving at 80 miles an hour crashing from a bank of Tully fog and coming upon you with the grill in stark relief.
This came to mind as I got out of my car this afternoon having just returned from a meeting downtown. When I left the house it was drizzly gray with sunshine attempting to peek from the storm clouds overhead. Just a couple of hours later the air has shifted.
The light is sharp. Even though the sky above echoes with the tired pale blue of winter, and the sun lays at a deep, low angle in the sky, the glow from above cuts a sharp figure around every building and every tree. In spite of the chill a slight scent of sea wafts by, reminding me of those winter days long ago when my family would head for our beach house in New Jersey. We'd wander on the beach and boardwalk - everything shuttered and desolate with everyone but a few locals gone to winter inland.
If you're lucky enough to be in the Bay Area, specifically in San Francisco, make sure and get outside today. Close your eyes. Take a deep breath. And make sure to revel in this glorious weather.
I have decided that today is the day I start exercising.
Anyone who knows me even a little now has a quizzical furrow between their brows. Except, of course, for the subset of my circle with a new beau ... bo-tox.
Whether visible or not, the confusion is palpable.
"Um, Cathy ... Start exercising? You're already at the gym most days. We don't have to have an intervention, do we?"
Rest easy, my friends. I'm talking about restoring some slightly atrophied muscles of a different sort ...
I'm talking about the muscle memory of being creative. That means different things to different people. In my case, it's about putting pen to paper, finger to keyboard, air to vocal cords or some combination thereof.
Every writer I know, regardless of genre, has spoken at some point about needing to find a consistent rhythm for the creative process. The need to turn the act of writing into an involuntary action, or at least a good, solid habit. Endurance training for the creative tendons and ligaments - things you must keep strong and flexible if you want to be nimble and survive.
Writing is pervasive in my life. The act of stringing words together in various combinations (Dare I call it literary beading? Urg. No. Bad idea.) is central for me. From the business proposals and corporate writing I did in past lives through various jobs in the media; and from the rapid-fire exchange of daily email tsunami to the ongoing analysis and perspectives I generate as an analyst for Guidewire Group - my existence is about creating content. But writing every day, churning out a consistent flow of quality content, takes discipline - a discipline I've found more than a little challenging to embrace.
When it comes to my professional content, the weekly editorial deadlines for Guidewire Group ensure a consistent drumbeat from my keyboard. I don't have such motivators here at Other Than That, and as a result I find that I've been slacking off when it comes to getting my thoughts together, and into the digital realm.
And so it is this particular ligament to which I direct my attention.
Pulling, strengthening, pushing the limits until the cadence of language rises and falls with more regularity upon this digital canvas.
I'd better find a good orthopedist ... just in case.
Everyone knows that fall is the sweet spot in terms of spectacular weather in the Bay Area. Today is no exception - not a cloud, deep blue skies and warm sunshine bathing the City.
But despite the brilliance of today's sun, I have no shadow.
My best friend Archie, the Soft-Coated Wheaten Terrier who never left my side, died last night. We'd been together 10 years and in that decade we lived several lifetimes.
Everyone knows that pets die. We all die. But pets in particular have such short lives compared to those with whom they live. So when we take on the responsibility of a pet, we do so knowing that they will be with us only a short period of time.
Even so, as I sit today, alone in my apartment that echoes with his absence, the pain is eerily familiar. It's a deep, vacant ache reminiscent of those first moments when all the guests left on the last day of sitting shiva for my father. With everyone gone there's a ragged-edge void, a booming echo in the space where Archie used to be.
Some might raise an eyebrow or even condemn me for making such a comparison. "You're crazy," they might say. "Your father gave you life, provided for you, sent you to college, took care of your needs, and protected you. Archie was a dog."
The people who would say such things are idiots. Perhaps I shouldn't be so harsh. After all, any person with such an incredibly pathetic view of the incredible gift that the pure soul of an animal is to one's life probably deserves my pity more than my condemnation. Besides, these people are of little consequence, because to those who knew Archie, who experienced his joy of life and witnessed the connection between this little man in a fur suit and me there are no raised eyebrows and no question to the magnitude of this loss.
In returning to thoughts of Archie, the tears rise again and I weep, in spite of the fact that I know he was in pain and so this is for the best. In spite of the fact that I know that he's in a better place where he's always young, there will always be Bully Stix and he can run perpetually on the sand and in the surf - and never have to get a bath.
But no amount of understanding can soften the sharp stabs that come every time I shift my leg under the desk where I sit writing this, and sweep across the empty space where Archie would always lay as I worked.
This entire experience, especially the last 36 hours, feels a bit as though wound along the plotline of a crafted script.
It began on August 29. That was the day I returned to the Bay Area from a short visit to my family in Florida. Upon landing at SFO and turning on my cell phone, I found a voice mail from the dog sitter. Archie had re-injured his neck. It was a long-time injury that tended to flare up when Archie was doing something over-zealous. In this case, he'd been allowed to wrestle with a Golden Retriever, and in doing so his neck flared up.
I'll truncate much of the story here. The gist is simple. Archie had to go on massive anti-inflammatory drugs along with a hefty dose of painkillers to relieve his discomfort. In the process, the vet checked and found that his kidneys were acting up. Now it bears mentioning that Archie's kidneys were always a bit dodgy. It's a problem that the Soft-Coated Wheaten Terrier faces as a breed.
Long story short - we switched his diet to support the kidneys, and the new diet gave him violent diarrhea. This created the downward spiral that led to his death. The dehydration and taxing on his system compounded by the heavy drugs, resulted in pancreatitis.
On September 12 Archie went into the vet.
On September 13, after aggressive IV fluids and drugs his numbers showed no improvement. But his spirits were okay.
On September 14, the numbers looked just a tiny bit better, but Archie's demeanor had shifted. When I visited him at the vet's office, I recognized the look on his face. It was the same expression my father had the last time I saw him alive. He was tired and had given up fighting.
I shook off that feeling and went home, hopeful that the slightly better numbers would continue to improve overnight.
My hope was for naught.
On September 15, there was no improvement. I went to the vet and saw that his spirits were shot. We had one last option - take him to a veterinary specialist for IV feeding and acupuncture. The chances of success hovered around 5 percent. And even those odds were only that he'd survive, but not have a great quality of life.
After some consideration, and a gentle urging from my vet, I opted to let him go.
The actual moment was remarkable. I got to the vet's office at about 4:40pm. They told me that he'd started crying a bit and that rather than taking him home for one last night, they recommended that we do the injection right away. With a deep breath I walked into the back of the office. They opened up his cage so that I could get next to him.
It looked as though they'd bathed him or at least brushed out his hair. He was laying on his side, with his head on the sweatshirt that I'd left there so he could have my scent with him. Dropping to my knees, I leaned into the cage and put my arm around him.
"Archie, mommy's here."
At the sound of my voice, Archie pried his head from the pillow and turned. His movement was thick and his drug-addled gaze was glassy and blank. Then he blinked, those clouds cleared for a moment and I was looking into those deep, chocolate eyes I knew so well. He stared into my eyes, right through me as he always did when there was something important to say. And then he blinked again, turning his head away. A deep gasp, followed by another and then a shudder went through his body as it went limp in my arms. And with that, Archie was gone.
Archie was my shadow, my mirror, my confidante. He was my lifeline. He endured the most excruciating moments of my life - from my coming out through the death of my father and everything on the spectrum in between - and he did so with the most incredibly pure love. I am a better woman for having had him in my life.
I know the pain will abate. I know that he's in a better place. I know that one day another dog will find its way into my life. But for now, I mourn the loss of a spirit whose gentle soul and kind heart have left me changed forever.
Well, I did it. It took one or two more running starts since posting my last essay on the topic, but I finally spoke with my friend. You know, the one for whom I found that I was developing feelings beyond just plain old friendship.
That's a bit harsh of a description but that's how it felt. What actually happened was more of the, "I'm really flattered, but ..."
Since I'm trying to practice something new - namely, when I learn a lesson, I don't belabour the topic, I make the changes I need to make and then move on - I won't go into the details.
Suffice to say that in spite of a very lovely follow-up note in which she commended my courage and expressed gratitude for my candor, I felt pretty lousy.
A small army of emotional hobgoblins from days gone by took to arms and paraded through my head in lockstep: "Sorry kid, you're just not hot enough for her." "Nice try, chump. Try punching in your weight class next time."
A couple of days ... okay, maybe a couple of weeks is more accurate ... anyway, a bit of time later and the feeling passed, leaving in its wake the reminder that being rejected is a bit like when you're hammering in a nail and miss and thump your finger. It stings momentarily. Then comes the throbbing pain, which subsides at a rate usually relative to the strength of the blow.
In the big picture this particular thump wasn't all that bad.
Nothing's broken, and if anything our relationship will be an even deeper and more solid one, since it's built on real honesty. Candor is about as solid a substance you can pour for the foundation of a friendship
Bruised ego and dented self-esteem aside, the truth is that I understand where she's coming from. After all, even if you think someone is fabulous you can't force chemistry. I've been in the situation myself where someone had feelings for me and I just ... well ... in the words of a dear friend, "If there's no shwing. There's no shwing."
It's an odd thing, attraction. On one level there's an unquestionably objective aspect to it. I don't mean to be cruel, but let's be honest. Empirically speaking, some folks are just better looking than others.
Of course, the most dashing and sexy looks deteriorate rapidly if the individual isn't also beautiful inside. Platitude? Perhaps. But we all know it's true. The most stunningly handsome man becomes quite the troll after revealing that he's a chauvinistic liar who cheats on his wife. And the most homely geek morphs into someone quite remarkable after showing an intelligent compassion for others' feelings.
I could go on about the nature of relationships. I could wax on with my thoughts on the role that corporeal attraction plays. I could proffer pontification on the conundrum of physical magnetism and the difference between a purely physical charge and a deep passion that can evolve from a more solid connection.
But I won't.
Because like I said, I'm trying to cut out overindulgent blathering, learn from my life experiences, and move on.
After flying all day and all night, and arriving at Madrid's Atocha Train Station at 8:30am the last thing I wanted to hear from the ticket guy was that my reservation wasn't actually confirmed and the trains to Zaragoza were sold out.
No sweat, I thought. I'll call the folks from Guidewire Group and get to the bottom of this.
That's when I found out that my cell phone wasn't working.
Thankfully Stephen Wildstrom (a long-time pal and stellar journalist from Business Week) was on the same flight as I. We'd shared a taxi to the train station and he was still talking with a ticket agent - one who looked a bit more helpful than the surly fellow I had encountered. I wandered over, and put on my best "damsel in distress can't you help me look."
Whether that was the clincher or this guy was just more adept with the ticketing system I don't know. I don't really care, because all that mattered was that he took my credit card and confirmed me on the 5:00pm train.
"Looks like you get a day in Madrid," Steve said. "You should go to the Prado."
I didn't have a map. My Spanish is ... well ... let's say at this point in my trip I wasn't feeling very confident with my language skills. (Something that by week's end would turn out changing nicely, but not at the point of this story.) And of course my cell phone didn't work.
Bottom line - I was in a town where I had no direction, no way to communicate with anyone I did know, and was rendered largely mute by the language barrier.
I love a good adventure.
And so I went. Prado, here I come.
I said good-bye to Steve (he was on the 9:40a train) , stashed my bags in a locker (cool security luggage locker set-up at Atocha station, and easy to use too) and went for a walk.
I figured it was too early for the museum, besides I wasn't quite sure where it was.
Crossing the street and ducking up a side alley, I found myself at the gates of what appeared to be a sizeable park. It was Madrid's botanical gardens. A meander through the trees with a brief stop to watch some kids playing futbol (that's soccer to you American folk) was just the thing to help clear my brain from airplane air.
Out of the park I walked, down a street, another turn of the corner and I found myself at the doors of the Prado.
I love when aimless wandering ends up fitting with a plan.
There's nothing quite like getting to a museum as soon as it opens - no lines, no crowds. With the place almost empty I spent quite a lot of time soaking in the saturated hues of The Prado's extensive Francisco de Goya collection. Gallery after gallery of gothic images - aristocrats, royalty and a panoply of deeply graphic religious images.
I avoided spending too much time with the latter - it's bad enough when the eyes of these canvases follow you, add to that a penetrating guilt-laden glare and in many cases expressions of sheer pain and it's downright creepy.
The portraits were what captivated me most - these images of real people whose social station (or perhaps pure ego) led them to commission larger-than-life canvases of their likeness. Who were they, really? What were they actually thinking as they posed for these images to be created? When their sitting ended, what did they do? Where did they go? Mostly, though, I thought about what they were trying to say with the images created. The choice of setting, clothing, position and expression - all of these things were chosen carefully for images of this nature.
I recently read an essay published in Vanity Fair that referred to the "... identical moist-lipped, fleshy, Teutonic pie face" images of 18th century aristocracy that seemed almost carbon copied from one canvas to the next. (It's in the June issue if you're interested in reading it. Entitled "Another Feitelberg Against the War", the author was the winner of the magazine's second annual essay-writing contest.)
While meandering the galleries and reviewing painting after painting this article stuck in my mind. Barring those images where the subject either glared with anger or seethed with projected guilt, I saw a distinct pattern of vacant stares.
In this Vanity Fair essay, the writer (Deirdre Sullivan) talks about the vapid nature of today's "youth" (which she seems to categorize as those in their 30s and downward). Pointing to this generation's lack of any real direction or purpose and the dearth of any true goal or aspiration, she paints a rather disappointing (and accurate, I'm afraid) picture of the generation that currently sits closest to taking the reins for America's future.
During the rest of the day I found myself in a rather unusual space to mull this point over. Being alone in Madrid, and having only a basic level of communication capability with those around me, I spent a lot time watching those around me. Granted, I couldn't be certain of the conversations being had as I was only picking up parts of the sentences, but the the intensity with which people engaged in conversation and the topics - politics, war, education - seemed to me to have a level of intellectual importance that are often lacking when one wanders similar sorts of spots (cafes and the like) around the United States.
Now I realize I'm making a broad-sweeping comment here. After all, those with whom I socialize and the places I generally go are rife with deeply interesting people and conversations about things that definitely go beyond the inane into topics of importance.
The images of those paintings - the ones with the vapid eyes and spooky disposition - were those of aristocracy, the entitled class. And as I looked around these cafes and streets in Madrid and then thought about similar locations in the US I realized that with our role as the most powerful country in the world it made sense that those fleshy-lipped, vacant stares had shifted to the West, changed out of their elegant aristocratic garb into the Levi-laden, Gap-infused, Starbucks swilling population of the United States.
But I tried not to focus too hard on this depressing thought. I was, after all, lazing in the Castillian sunshine at cafe after cafe, eating super food and swilling some of the best coffee ever.
Time ticked by and the hour came when it was time to head for my train. I said good-bye to this lovely part of Madrid, wended my way back to Atocha station, boarded my train and dozed off as we passed through the verdant Spanish countryside.
There's nothing like an epiphany. Though I'd be pretty happy if rather than a sharp smack upside the head that the lesson came more like a golden amber shaft of light piercing low grey morning clouds over the glassy slate of an ocean or bay.
You cannot be upset with someone or with a situation when you have not clearly communicated what your boundaries are and where your tender spots are when it comes to other people's behaviors. In other words, if someone behaves in a way that is inconsistent with your internal monologue, it's your own fault. After all, most folks aren't mind readers. In short - either open your mouth and speak what's on your mind or shut up and stop whining.
Like I said ... WHACK.
Of course this whole thing has come to my attention because of a relationship. Actually I should say the specter of a potential relationship.
Here's the scenario: Let's say there's someone to whom you're attracted. Let's say that you have some similar interests ... a rather uncanny set of similar interests ... and let's say that there's clearly a sense of mutual enjoyment - dare I say, pleasure - any time you have even the most brief of interactions.
Based on a series of conversations and a basic gut instinct, you have a sense that maybe, just maybe there may be some mutual attraction on some level.
Sounds like it should be a simple equation, right?
Yeah. Maybe if you live in an episode of some highly rated, well-written dramatic comedy that wins at least one Emmy every fucking season.
For the rest of us things aren't quite so simple.
Instead of speaking in the ever-so-safe third person plural, I'll bring this one directly home.
I'm smitten. Perhaps it's more accurate to describe me as thoroughly fascinated. I'd say "I met someone," which of course would technically be true, but that phrase indicates that this is someone with whom I've moved beyond basic pleasantries and have actually gone out with on a date; or that there's an established mutual interest.
Not, precisely.
We've been in public together several times. A few times it was on purpose. There was even one night when I got picked up and dropped off - something that if I were living in the heterosexual world could most certainly have been considered a date.
Like I said. For the rest of us, things aren't quite so simple.
We met quite a few months ago, but only started to truly get to know each other in the first part of this year. In that brief time there have been a rather stunning number of realizations about what we have in common. Some things are seemingly inane or basic - a penchant for unusually flavored lip balm, culinary fascination over pizza and pork chops, an almost pathological attention to grammatical structure and vocabulary choice. Other things are more profound, or at least more philosophical - desire for connections where we have freedom and independence while at the same time enjoy a sense of being safe, a distaste for passive-aggressive conversations and love of direct communication, and ultimately a desire for trust and intimacy.
Again, what's the problem, right?
Here's where the wheels come off the cart.
She doesn't know I exist.
Okay so that's a teensy weensy exaggeration. Obviously she knows I exist. We are, after all, becoming friends and spending time together. What I mean is that I don't think that she sees me, at least not as anything more than a friend. We have a grand time when we're together. We laugh, have serious and profound discussions and share intimate perspectives on life; but in terms of it having a romantic leaning I'm finding my usually fine-tuned instincts ... well ... absent.
The fact that we're getting to know each other and clearly find each other simpatico isn't altogether a bad thing. Because, of course, as anyone can tell you the one kind of relationship that you can always trust as a woman - whether lesbian or not - is that of your girlfriends. In my specific case it's also a very good thing because, well, she's a stellar human being who makes a superb addition to that ever-protected immediate circle of confidence that one calls "close friends."
Now my perspective on this whole friend versus girlfriend thing is pretty simple. Friendship is a prerequisite for getting more seriously and intimately involved. Period. I've spent enough time in heart-a-flutter-butterflies-the-size-of-pterodactyl connections to know that ultimately they never work. That said there is no question that a romantic relationship must have some sort of spark.
There has been more than one occasion on which I've thought I felt something of a charge with this particular individual. And there have been moments in conversation where I'm pretty sure my interest is a reciprocal sort of thing.
One of my friends told me to stop being such a chicken, tell this woman how I feel, and get on with it. Perhaps a simple act on paper, but the reality is, as I said before, more complicated.
The stakes in this game are high. Truly superb individuals are a rare commodity, and when found should be held in high regard. This statement may seem strange coming from someone who, as one friend put it, knows more people than most individuals ever meet in life; but while quality and quantity would be nice in persistent tandem, the truth is that more often than not they're mutually exclusive. So when you meet someone whose intellectual, emotional and spiritual combination result in someone special whose presence increases the quality of your life ... well ... you don't want to jeopardize that. At the same time in order for any friendship to truly take root and grow it requires honesty, candor and authenticity of behavior.
I've written about boundaries several times on this site. I've also written about the conundrum when one's personal boundaries collide with someone else's and the delicate navigation that ensues from being true to one's self and at the same time being respectful of others. I've also written about the importance of patience when it comes piloting these particular waters.
Patience is vital, however, in seeing how this situation is unfolding in the ever-rapidly-moving place of my internal dialogue, I see a distressing pattern that I am keen to break.
You see, this isn't the first situation like this, where I met someone superb, began fostering a friendship, sensed some sort of connection beyond friendship and then allowed my fear of "ruining" the friendship and a deeper seeded terror of rejection to render me mute.
The result in this other case is a friendship that began upon a chance meeting at a conference several years ago and continues today to grow and thrive. I often wonder what might have happened had I taken a more forward approach in this other situation. But that's a would've-could've-should've scenario and as my father and mother always told me, those are just a waste of time. What matters is how you react today to the events and scenarios placed in front of you, not how you imagine things might have gone had you reacted a certain way. And in the category of "all things happen for a reason" (another topic I've addressed in my musings on this site), that particular relationship is now precisely what it is supposed to be - a good, platonic friendship.
In a recent commentary ("Fireflies") I talked about my saying good-bye to living behind the old walls. It's easy to talk about things, but now in rather short order I find myself put in a situation where it's time to prove that I've learned the lesson.
I could easily follow the same path with this woman that I have in the past. It would be simple to take a deep breath, swallow my pride and cast aside the feelings that sit on top of the friendship foundation that already lies in place.
But simple isn't always best, at least not when it comes to breaking old habits, and making the conscious decision to move past old behaviors and embrace something new.
That loud clattering noise you may hear is me casting aside that old mode and, with crossed fingers trying something new.
No matter how it turns out, I can be proud of myself for taking the chance ... or at this writing at least thinking about it ... and for embracing the true me.
This past weekend I went to Hollister. It's a ranching town about two hours south of San Francisco. Though I've hated the rain this winter, when I saw the impossibly emerald blanket tucked around every hillside and field, I forgave Mother Nature and then took a deep inhale of fresh crops and raw earthen sod.
Ranchland is a fairly new experience for me. After all, I grew up in suburban Philadelphia. But somehow, when I sat late at night in my friend's cottage, my thoughts turned to home. More specifically they turned to a hole in my heart where home was. A hole dug six years ago. The hole that sits where my father used to be.
I know. I know. When you lose someone, they're never really gone. The memories you have carry on forever. So, too, it is true with my father. He's with me every day. And I'm probably more blessed than many in that my sense of him remains powerful - even all these years later.
But there are times when none of this matters because no matter what anyone tells you, the truth is that when someone dies they're gone. Period. And even though memories are a spectacular thing, they don't replace the person. They can't.
So on this night, I miss my father. I come to a place like this where it's so quiet and I can hear the crickets and I think about the nights ... the warm spring and early summer nights in Philadelphia when we used to sit outside in after dinner looking at fireflies and smelling the velvet and silk aroma of lilac from the property next door. Wrapped around the sweetness was the rich, earthy texture of freshly cut grass with a whispering sheath of tobacco from my father's cigar.
We'd sit in the dark with the crickets and the occasional buzz of a mosquito poking gently into the deep green silence. Lazy flashing specks hovering in the thick air, glow lights I'd capture in a jar to take inside. How disappointed I was when in the bright incandescence the brilliant glow faded to a pale shudder as the terrified fireflies gathered at the edges of the jar. Even now, sitting in the darkness so many decades later, I can hear daddy humming. No particular tune. Just a wordless melody that rose and fell breaking at moments as he paused reflecting on some thought that had blinked on and off ... a firefly moment in his head.
I wonder what some of those thoughts were. I wish I'd asked him more questions. I don't feel that I got to know him nearly enough and so I cling to the stories I know and the vivid memories that I recall - the early morning bike rides in Atlantic City during the summer. Those evenings we spent in the backyard with the fireflies. Winter barbecue nights with my father marching back and forth in front of the kitchen window at our house on Meadow Lane.
I was awake on this particular night, writing down these particular thoughts because I couldn't sleep. I went to this ranch in Hollister to provide support to a friend who just lost his life partner - the person with whom he spent more than half of his life. For some reason these stories of my father came to mind. I felt as tears welled up in my eyes and then spilled over, burning a warm trail that cooled quickly in the night air.
Generally I'm not one who feels terribly lonely. Rather gregarious and blessed to be surrounded by wonderful friends and family, I live a life enviably filled with love and warmth. But thinking about Steve and his loss, and thinking about my father, in the dark I felt completely alone. In this moment, a thought that has long been in my head suddenly stood in stark relief against the dark night - a neon-inspired mental firefly of my own.
Life is too short and too precious to be spent behind emotional walls.
It might seem from what I've just said that I don't exactly live in a fortress when it comes to personal connections, but the truth is that I - like so many other people - am no different when it comes to having an aversion to allowing for the truly deep commitment that must exist in a primary romantic life partner type relationship.
There have been several relationships in my life where I had thought I'd made the connection; but as I sat in the darkness I ran through each of them and reviewed the patterns my life had followed. I thought about the wounds from those failed relationships that had resulted in my building slightly wider and higher barricades from which I then had to emerge the next time around.
It was a sleepless night.
A fistful and a half of hours later, the morning broke in grayish gold and I found myself wrestling with the minor demons of a restless night's sleep. My dreams had been scattered and though the images were gone, I had a sense that there were messages that I was supposed to remember.
It took about 8 more hours, a bit of exercise and then an exceedingly long soak in a hot tub, but finally my thoughts sorted. And thank goodness they did. Because the truth is that these issues of relationships, boundaries and connections have been roiling around in my brain for some time. The topic has flowed in and out of my writing - though most of the pieces sat half-finished in my "still pending" folder.
Until this week.
In fact, in the spirit of disclosure, several of the recent commentary pieces are dated by when I started writing them, but I've only just finished them this week. So if this is the first piece of mine you're reading, I recommend checking out some of the previous entries. It will be pretty clear which ones I'm talking about.
But back to my point ...
When I awakened on Easter morning at the ranch in Hollister, I thought that the ideas whirling about in my head were about what I had done wrong in my old relationships. I was wrong.
The thoughts in my head were about what I had done right.
It's not that I hadn't made mistakes. It was precisely the opposite. I had made mistakes, and each of those missteps meant that I hadn't allowed a perceived failure to paralyze me and prevent my trying again.
Yes, I had allowed boundaries and walls to impede past relationships both by overstepping the lines of others and by using my own to keep people out. There also had been times when I failed to be truly authentic and open. But those lessons were learned, and it was time to move on.
The tears I shed that evening weren't about feeling lonely, nor were they about regret. They were about saying goodbye.
At some point that evening in Hollister I said farewell to a part of me that, like a firefly seen in bright light, didn't hold any particular mystery and was best freed from the jar and put back out into the night air.
March 29 - April 2, 2006 marked the 16th annual Dinah Shore golf tournament in Palm Springs. Technically it's not the Dinah Shore any more. It's now called the Nestle Lipton Tournament. But to many it is still the Dinah Shore Weekend - one of the largest gatherings of the lesbian community in the world.
This year I made my maiden voyage, so to speak; and for me the Dinah Shore Weekend was more than a Sapphic scenario. It was also one of the more fascinating spots for people watching I've experienced in quite some time.
For those who haven't been, Palm Springs is a beautiful place. Abutting a rocky range, nestled right up to the base, the town exists in an odd plane where myriad habitats - each with its unique life forms - converge.
There is the desert - arid, unforgiving and stern.
There are the mountains - craggy and powerful.
And into this mix is thrown civilization, scraped onto the surface, wherever it can stick.
The fauna complementing the flora are equally at odds; and it's particularly interesting when the edges from these separate circles of life overlap. Most of the time they coexist. There's balance.
But sometimes rather than gently overlapping, the disparate creatures from different ecosystems smack up against each other.
And so it is in this desert town that I witnessed just such a collision.
The setting: The lobby bar of the Wyndham Hotel in Palm Springs, 3:00pm, March 31, 2006.
As I mentioned, this weekend I chose to make the desert trek to Palm Springs was the annual Dinah Shore Weekend. Several thousand lesbians from all parts of the country (and some from overseas) gather for pool parties, film festivals, concerts and comedy shows. On this particular day the weather was a bit overcast, so I was looking for a cozy spot inside to curl up with a magazine and a view of the goings-on by the pool. I sidled up to the bar to pick up a beverage, and overheard a guy talking to his buddy on the phone.
"Dude! Man you have GOT to get down here. There's this GIRL party and - DUDE you HAVE to get down here."
At that moment I turned, he glanced my way, and our eyes met. I took the opportunity to point out to him that he was drooling.
His response: "I am NOT."
I wanted to point out to him that he could gawk all he liked, but no one was interested. (Well, that's probably not entirely accurate since there were likely some bi-sexual gals around, but this particular weekend they were more apt to be fishing from the other side of the boat.)
My next instinct was to slap his face; and then pull the barstool out from under him, kick him - probably several times - and tell him to take his scum-sucking-lowlife-lecherous friends and get the fuck out.
Thankfully the angry wave passed quickly and shifted towards a pure curiosity.
"Why are YOU here this weekend?" I wanted to ask. "Do you know what's happening here, or was it dumb luck?"
Others do, after all, come to this town on this particular weekend. What activity or plan had drawn him to this town on this day? Perhaps through this conversation I could learn a bit more about the male psyche.
That's when he snorted into the phone again: "No! Dude! Some of them are f---kin' HOT, and we're the ONLY guys!"
Sometimes wild animals are fine when suddenly and unexpectedly thrust into something that's not their natural habitat. Others may withdraw and try to blend in. And then there are others that will always pick a fight.
When you encounter the last type, it's best to turn quietly and walk away.
I just did something unusual. I took a vacation. It wasn't big one, and I didn't go anywhere exotic, but I did unplug from the grid (translation - no work email but not offline wholly) for a couple of days.
Of course, shutting my brain off, or at least shifting it into a lower gear, takes a while, so I found myself sitting in a restaurant my first night taking notes.
Time: About 7:00pm Pacific
Date: March 29, 2006
Location: Some restaurant in Palm Springs, California.
So here I sit in Palm Springs. I drove in this afternoon from LA. After checking in to my hotel I drove around a bit and found a little restaurant. It shouldn't have been a surprise to me that I was the youngest person in the room ... by at least 20 years.
The ever so fey host showed me to a lovely table tucked into corner. It was a perfect vantage point from which I could observe. I don't often have the luxury of completely anonymous people watching - at least not at home in San Francisco where I generally run into someone I know almost anywhere I go. Since I made this trip to Palm Springs solo, I took full advantage of my fly-on-the-wall status to observe. From my corner I had full view of the main dining room and also the piano in the bar. It was a baby grand surrounded by barstools upon which were perched an assortment of older patrons. There was one couple in particular that held my attention. They looked to be in their 70s. She reminded me of my mom - a stylish, attractive woman who was swaying on her stool to the music quietly singing the lyrics.
What caught my eye was during one particular love song. I don't recall the title, and frankly the words were almost irrelevant because the gaze with which she stared at her significant other took center stage. With one hand sitting on his leg in a comfortable gesture speaking many years of familiarity, she leaned slightly towards him almost seeming to whisper the song in his ear. As the song progressed, he inclined towards her. A mirror above the piano allowed me a glimpse of their faces - beatific smiles shared back and forth.
The sense of history between them was palpable from across the room. I sat watching them, feeling the warm, chenille texture of this connection. It was gentle, timeless.
I finished up and headed across the street to the Riviera Resort where an opening night event for the Dinah Shore Weekend festivities was about to get underway. (If you don't know about "The Dinah", check out my commentary entry "Sapphic Wildlife.")
I was early and so settled into an oversized wicker chair in the lobby. No sooner had I tossed one leg over the arm of the chair (sorry mom), than a group of young women walked through. They looked to be in their early 20s, and could have easily stepped from the set of The O.C. or some other program on the WB.
Snippets of their conversation bounced across the room, sparkly and bubbly comments that matched their fabulous strappy shoes and impossibly low cut jeans. One couple stood out from the others. The music had started up in the bar. These two women caught the rhythm and had started to dance together. Suddenly I flashed back to the couple at the restaurant and in these two young women felt that same gentle warmth exuded by the couple by the piano.
I smiled. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
DISCLAIMER: I started writing this on February 20, 2006. I got as far as the first two sentences. After a rather epiphany filled weekend in April I finally put the rest of these thoughts together.
In the spirit of continuing a theme, I've been thinking about boundaries. And I've come to a conclusion.
I know. Shocking. You'd think that this would be no-brainer, but based on the conversations I've had with many friends, it would seem that this seemingly obvious observation has caught more people than me by surprise.
Like many people, or at least the many people who I seem to encounter, I have spent a sizeable chunk of my time working through the emotional landfill that results from various and sundry life experiences - relationships, career, loss, you know, that kind of stuff.
Though far from perfect I'm pretty confident that I can qualify myself as fairly well balanced and even - dare I say - emotionally stable. And then I meet someone who captures my interest and the wheels come off the cart.
Because here I am - fully therapized (I know, not a word, but it seemed fitting anyway), well adjusted and knowing what I do and don't want; and there before me is someone who is stunning, charming, intelligent and ... well ... fascinating. We appear to have quite a bit in common, and I even get a sense that the interest may be, at least on some level, mutual.
So what's the problem?
It's these damn boundaries.
Because part of my fresh boundary definition includes the fact that I no longer rush blindly into things and now take time to get to know people on a deeper level, which means truly learning their boundaries. It also means that in my pursuit of being authentic with my own boundaries I cannot disrespect others'.
It becomes even more of a challenge because of course if the person in question is someone who you truly appreciate for their wit, candor and generally erudite sensibility, there is also more at stake should efforts at pursuing something more than friendship be ... well ... a bust.
Needless to say, this puts me in a bit of a pickle. I'd like to be honest, authentic and true to how I feel, and at the same time find myself both unwilling to risk the loss of what is the start of a friendship that has superb potential.
Thankfully, this is where a fresh lesson has seen fit to smack me soundly upside the head.
The learning here isn't about the boundaries, it's about the practice of getting to know someone and letting them, in turn, get to know me. The lesson here isn't about boundaries. It's about patience.
I saw a great cartoon in The New Yorker not too long ago. It was a single panel with a businessman sitting behind a desk. Another businessman sat on his lap saying ...
Boundaries. They're critical part of existence. We put them in place to define our space - physical and emotional. They help structure our sense of self and our relation to the world around us. They enable us to establish a place in society - whether at work or at play - defining who we are and how we are in the world.
How better to understand yourself than by relating to the things and people around you? Putting things in perspective and giving you a litmus test against which to test the acidic and basic nature of life experience - this relativity is, indeed, crucial in life.
But as with so many aspects of existence the very things that we use to define and support our lives can turn into something dangerous or at least a serious pain in the ass.
If you're not careful the boundaries you've put into place as a safeguard for your spirit, soul and sanity can - and often do - turn into walls. It's true that sometimes these walls are necessary. Perhaps we've been hurt or otherwise wounded by one life experience or another. In these cases, marking your boundary with something more defined serves to shelter and protect while you heal.
The problem arises when we forget that these walls are only supposed to be temporary. I've been noticing lately that many people - myself included - extend the purpose and density of these barriers, until they become more than something to protect. Instead they become a convenient excuse to deflect; a way to avoid any entanglement that could potentially lead to an old wound being torn open.
A friend of mine recently referred to these barriers as an emotional Maginot Line - an analogy with which I don't fully agree, at least not in the way she was using it which was to say that these defenses are wholly useless. Because even though the term is generally used "as a metaphor for something that is confidently relied upon despite being ineffectual" (At least according to the definition found at Wikipedia.org.); the truth is that the Maginot Line fulfilled its purpose. It sealed off part of France, and in the spots where forts sat along the line, the German troops were forced to go around.
These personal safeguards to, after all, have a very relevant purpose. They're just not supposed to be permanent. I tend to think of these personal safeguards as temporary shelter. It is critical to take the time in these protected places to make decisions about the things we want to do in life, the people with whom we want to interact on both a personal and professional level, and the kind of person who we want to be.
But just like a shelter where one might retreat from a storm, at some point you need to emerge. Just as it's important to have the clarity and self-preservation to know when you should go within; it is just as critical to be clear on when it is time to step outside these walls and engage fully with the world at large.
So when is it time to step outside? At what point do you know that it's safe to move beyond the protection and back into the line of fire from other potential emotional slings and arrows.
It would be nice if there were an emotional "all clear" siren or some sort of sentry who could wave the white flag signaling it was safe. Unfortunately it's not that easy.
So what's the answer? Damned if I know. But I can tell you this. I would rather return to the outside world a bit too soon and take a direct hit on a still healing psychological bruise than stay for too long within the walls of an emotional prison of my own making.
Whenever I go through a major transition of any sort the first place I head is the beach. And whenever I do, it seems that Mother Nature is well aware of why I'm there.
There are people who love the mountains and there are people who love the beach. I love both, but if forced to choose, I'll take the rich aroma of brine and sand that wafts from the coast any day.
I grew up spending every summer by the beach in Atlantic City, NJ. (No Jersey jokes, please ... and for those of you who just can't help yourselves I'll save you the trouble ... it was exit #2, now with that out of the way, I'll carry on.)
Where was I?
Right. The beach.
Like many people, I have a deep connection to the ocean. It's the first place I go when faced with some sort of major event in my life - both joyous and not so.
Though I don't know that my data set is extensive enough to merit full belief that there's a metaphysical connection, it does seem that any time I face a personal or career crossroad and head for the beach in California the surf is particularly rough - powerful waves crushing the shoreline, heaving froth at the sand, a cascading rumble punctuating each toss.
Certainly the shoreline of Northern California tends to be more rugged than calm, but I'm not talking about your average coastal surf. I'm talking about the kind of waves that hit the break line with a roar that rips the air in two.
And so I sit back, feet burrowed in the sand, feeling the cool mist spray from the edges of each wave when it reaches for the beach as if to hug it, but ending each gesture with a sharp slap.
It feels like Neptune is leaning forward and offering a sharp slap upside the head to anyone, everyone. My question is how a person could possibly witness this scene without paying heed. And as a matter of fact, every time the crack sounds, the heads of anyone on the shoreline who wasn't already transfixed by the waves snapped to attention.
We spend so much of our time removed from nature, buffered by time spent in cubicles, cars, apartments, homes - moving from one box to another spending little time connected to the energy around us.
No wonder people are bored at work, at home, in relationships. This caged existence cuts off the vital power line that runs between our respective psyche and the world in which we live. But unlike other energy crises, this is a power shortage that you have the power to fix.
So take a moment and take a trip to the beach. It's worth getting some sand between your toes.
If you're in San Francisco and head to Baker Beach, look down the shoreline for me and Archie. We'll be down there plugged into the power grid and happy to clear a spot on the sand for you.
The smell of construction - fresh sawdust from woodwork mixed with the damp perfume of freshly poured concrete - brings a strange sense of peace to me. Perhaps it's the memory of spending that time with my father. Perhaps it's the sense that newly constructed places offer a fresh slate for people's experiences. Whatever it might be, I am endlessly fascinated by the creation of spaces, and so when I saw these images I connected immediately.
The title of the series, (re) building, would seem to indicate a reconstruction, the opening and creation of a place. Yet I found myself wondering if perhaps the feeling behind these images was meant to convey a sense of constraint, even incarceration, with the running theme of bars cutting across many of the shots like a jail cell.
I figure it can't hurt to reinforce the reason that drove me to do this site in the first place ... beyond the basic fact that I'm an opinionated sort who tends towards verbosity ...
But in case it's not clear from what you may have read on the site so far, here's a direct commentary ...
Okay. Okay. So that's a rather sweeping generalization to make, but I think it's pretty safe to say in glancing around the world there's a rather prevalent sense that everything has to be bigger, faster, and more importantly - mine, mine, mine.
I don't know about you, but when I was a kid my parents were pretty clear with me regarding that kind of behavior - that whiny, spoiled, entitled nonsense.
They taught me that this behavior is not okay. Period.
Self-esteem? Yes.
Self-centered? No.
Not all one way or all another. Compromise. Balance. Many would agree things in this world are just that - a constant shift between right and left. Up and down. Dark and light. Fat and non-fat. It's about blending. Finding the right ratio of one to the other ... as it pertains to you.
This is where things get dodgy.
If you take the "as it pertains to yourself" part too far ... Well, like I said, too much of anything isn't good for you.
As I also said: People suck at moderation.
If you doubt this, just pick up a paper, read your online news service, listen to the radio (in any of its distribution flavors), even flip around one of the broadcast, cable or satellite TV stations out there.
The media reflects the society about which it speaks - both in content and in how it's presented. With that being the case, I think it's safe to say that we may be in some pretty deep cow pucky.
I figure there are plenty of places you can go to hear each player crow of their integrity - and then turn around and backhand the perceived competition upside the head.
If you're looking for a site like that, you're in the wrong place.
If you have already decided that this site is for screaming Liberals who may be entertaining but don't know shit about running the world, you may be cheering that there's another outlet to further destroy any shreds of credibility the lascivious left may still have.
If you think the Conservatives - ranging from arrogant and mildly annoying to the hellfire and brimstone ranting flavor - are secretly fascist terrorists who only function with their heads jammed up their collective posterior, you may herald the coming of a media outlet with the conviction and cojones to speak out against their wrongdoings.
You're both wrong.
This isn't about the right or left. It's about that sweet spot in the middle. Don't worry I'm not talking about Utopia here. Variegated cultures, opinions and beliefs will always exist - they should always exist. Whether or not people agree, we know that this is the case.
We also know that we're stuck sharing this blue marble living space. How about we try to find the middle ground.
When I worked in the corporate gauntlet, I often gathered interesting quotes to post by my desk.
It was one way to screen the bland walls of my corporate jail cell. It was also a way to surround myself with inspiration and humor. And in some cases send not so subtle hints to the bureaucratic world around me.
Now that I'm starting off a fresh year with a fresh perspective ... not to mention somewhat fresh liberty from working in a 9 to 5 world ... I thought I'd share some of my favorites.
Quite a few of these were sometimes used in signature files for my business email at work. Guess which ones raised hierarchical eyebrows!
"If you can keep your head while everyone else is running around losing theirs, perhaps you haven't fully grasped the gravity of the situation." -- Quote posted at the U.S. Strategic Air Command Headquarters
"Brevity is the soul of wit." -- William Shakespeare
"It is pardonable to be defeated but never to be surprised."
-- Frederick the Great
"It is better to die standing than to live on your knees." -- Spanish Revolutionary, Dolores Ibarruri
I love technology. I think gadgets are super cool. Unfortunately I don't quite have my act together in terms of the technology I need to get my audio files uploaded.
But thanks to my friend John Furrier my voice is finally on the Internet.
We spoke while I was at the BlogOn 2005 conference in New York. Our topic - PR and social media.
Lucky for me I decided to clean out my old AOL in-box today!
I came across a note from my friend Tiffany Shlain with information about an excellent film airing on Showtime Networks' Sundance Channel at the end of this week. I've seen this piece and it is stellar.
So here are the details:
"Life, Liberty & The Pursuit of Happiness" has been acquired for TV
broadcast by Showtime Networks' The Sundance Channel. It will begin
broadcasting on TV this Fall:
Television airdates are:
Thu 10/20/2005 8:45:00 PM
Wed 10/26/2005 6:45:00 AM
Wed 10/26/2005 7:15:00 PM
Sat 10/29/2005 7:45:00 PM
Mon 10/31/2005 10:45:00 AM
Don't miss it!!
I'm sorry, I don't think I heard you correctly ...
Disclaimer - I have no problem with rich people. Frankly, I wouldn't mind being one of them myself. I have a large degree of respect for individuals whose intelligence, tenacity, persistence and just plain savvy has stuffed their coffers and lined their deep pockets.
Granted, I may think that some of those individuals could use a bit of a personality transplant, but then again it's probably their being completely arrogant, puffed up, supercilious sorts that contributed to their being where they are today.
But no matter, the point today is about someone whose demeanor seems decidedly to the contrary of such things.
Even writing about Bruce M. Kelley goes a bit against the grain of who he seems to be ... Which, according to today's NY Times article to which I've linked, would seem to be a down-to-earth, stand-up guy whose business acumen has landed him in the Forbes top 400.
The part that I find most promising about his being there is the fact that unlike some of the other usual suspects on the list who seem to so humbly comment on their extravagent possessions with an off-hand, "Aw shucks, this old thing?" attitude, Bruce M. Kelley doesn't seem to give a rat's ass about those things. Rather, he's putting his efforts towards saving wildlife and the environment.
He may not want the limelight, but I think his efforts deserve it.
With the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, I can't help but think back to my first, and what has so far been my only, trip to Israel 10 years ago.
Frankly, it was the last place I wanted to go that summer. My hope was to head for Alaska and spend several weeks camping in Denali. So the idea of flying with several hundred members of my sister's congregration to the Middle East in June and riding on tour buses around the desert left a bit to be desired.
It was his first bout with Cancer and turned out to be the warning shot across our collective bow for what would come six years later. The fact that we found out about this tumor at all was a matter of chance. My father was having surgery to remove an irritated gland from his neck. A simple procedure, and so when he went in for his preparatory chest x-ray we didn't think much of it.
Until the doctor called and said there was a large mass in the lower lobe of his left lung. Further tests showed that it was malignant.
That happened on December 9, 1994.
The plan was to wait until my father had recuperated a bit from his neck surgery and then immediate send him back under the knife to have the tumor removed.
That happened in February 1995.
In March my sister asked me again if I wanted to go on the trip to Israel.
This time I said yes.
To put it simply - this trip transformed my life. It wasn't the soul shaking experience I had upon touching the Western Wall. It wasn't the incredible sense of connection to the millenia of history. It was the sense of place I found within my family, and within the larger group that is the Jewish people.
Each day I found myself more and more engaged with this phenomenal country. This place that's hardly more than a fraction of a sliver of land carved out in the midst of far larger nations. (Many of which, by the way, would be quite happy if Israel were to cease to exist altogether.)
Towards the end of our trip we journeyed to Yad Vashem - the Holocaust memorial. Gut wrenching. Horrifying. Infuriating. Perhaps most of all, inspiring.
Families massacred, entire towns expunged from the map, every thread of the Jewish culture and social fabric shredded - and yet the Jews survived this ordeal and today remain a steadfast people.
We stand steady in the face of adversity. We stand together in maintaining the history and heritage of more than 5,000 years. There are times when outside forces may snap us from the base, leaving us ragged, exposed and vulnerable but as long as we remember who we are, and never lose sight of the connection that brings us all together, those open wounds can heal, and we can continue to thrive.
Other than that ... other than that ... I'm getting so sick and tired of people exploiting this phrase - one that is quite near and dear to my heart, as you might imagine based on the name of this site.
It's not that I feel this phrase is mine or anything. Actually it's quite the contrary of that. This is the most democratic of phrases, one that should be used far and wide.
Okay. Maybe I'm being a bit harsh. After all, one shouldn't mock the intellectually challenged. (You know the ones I mean. The people who are living proof that Darwin was wrong, because if it was survival of the fittest, their bloodline would be long dead by now.)
But I digress ... I guess my knickers are all in a twist because I seem to keep running into people who use this phrase as an evasion tactic, as a means of making like of the situation and then dodging the need to address it.
It's true that this phrase, which so often is uttered in relation to poor Mrs. Lincoln's opinion of the play when it's more likely she was focused on getting the brain bits off of her hoop skirt, provides a tongue-welded-firmly-in-cheek way of shifting attention from the matter at hand. Unfortunately I often find that it is used beyond its intended sarcastic humor boundaries and panders to one of the greatest problems we have in society today - people's seeming inability to address uncomfortable issues directly.
Here's a novel idea. How about being direct? How about instead of trying to change the subject, even if it's uncomfortable, you sit still and acknowledge the 800 pound gorilla sitting in the middle of the room?
Here's an example - someone spends 20 minutes telling you all of the shitty things going on in their life, and rather than tossing out "Well, that sounds rotten, but other than that, how are you?" How about taking the proverbial bull by the horns and acknowledging what's just been said?
Maybe the situation calls for your being sympathetic and so you let the person know you feel badly for them and then maybe even offer some words of encouragement or perhaps draw their attention to something within their miserable litany that's not so bad after all.
Maybe, just maybe if we start acting this way, it will catch on.
I've taken creative license with the chronology of this posting. Though listed as being written in June, it's not actually until September that I wrote this.
The thing is, it's been a true challenge to compose my thoughts on this matter. It seemed fitting to date this entry for June, because my thinking started during the Pride celebration.
Pride is an interesting word. By one definition it represents a group of lions - a collective defined by a strong sense of belonging and with a clear organized hierarchy that serves to protect its members.
Unless you live under a rock - or in a supremely powerful state of denial - Pride also stands for the collective celebration that takes place every June in the gay community across this country.
To the outside observer it might seem that the abovementioned definition of Pride as related to a tightly knit group would apply. To the outside observer, it might seems that during Pride all of the queer commuity unites under the rainbow flag, locking arms and reveling together.
But as with many things the view from the inside is a whole lot different.
Sure, as a whole the gay community faces some serious discrimination and challenge from the rest of the world, but it seems to me that part of the problem lies in the gaping chasms running between the members of our own group.
For the uninitiated, here's a primer:
The general categories - Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgender (LGBT) ... but it doesn't stop there. Within each of the groups there lie myriad flavors. Of course, the sterotypes generally promote one over the rest - with lesbians is the diesel-dyke, buzz cut masculine variety that most of the world identifies for the group. With gay men it's the effeminate, limp-wristed, show-tune belting, interior designer with perfect hair.
Both are right.
Both are also wrong.
Of course sterotypes exist for a reason. Hell, I'm Jewish, and I'd be lying if I didn't admit that even within my own family tree lie the charicature representations of that community. But I'm also a lesbian, and being someone who is decidedly not of the butch variety, I have found myself paying more attention to these variations to the queer theme.
Lately it seems to me that one of the biggest challenges facing gays is our own divisiveness. "A nation divided unto itself cannot stand." So said Abe Lincoln all those years ago.
So how about a little tolerance people? How about instead of destroying ourselves, how about we foster within our own ranks the acceptance and open-mindedness that we so desperately seek from the rest of the world.
Instead of these splinter groups that slash through the greater community like so many blades, how about we view ourselves as a many faceted gem, each of the angles reflecting back and reflecting outward.
Maybe then we can start embracing Pride as more than a month-long excuse to party and wave the rainbow flag. Maybe then we can, become a greater collective, protecting each other and growing more powerful as a result.
Off-hand comments, tossed carelessly into a conversation in the way that one might toss their coat onto a chair upon entering a room. They permeate our lives, popping up several times during the course of one day, emitting such a consistent low hum within conversation that we barely seem them.
Except on those occasions when one spikes up and smacks you in the face (kind of like a rake will snap up and crack you if you step on the tines).
We had just returned from the cemetery, and I was standing in front of the spread of food. The Jewish traditions for mourning require that the bereaved family sit at home with friends and family coming to visit. It's called sitting Shiva. There are rituals and practices that everyone embraces as part of the Shiva process. For example, after returning home from the cemetery, everyone is supposed to walk around the block and then, before entering the home, you're supposed to wash your hands out on the front steps.
Another practice says that all the mirrors in the home must be covered and those in mourning aren't supposed to shower, primp or otherwise worry about their appearance. These are age-old traditions handed down from generation to generation.
I'm not sure, but at some point another critical tradition was added.
Eating, and alot of it.
My family's gathering was no exception, and not being one to buck any tradition related to food, I found myself standing by the ample buffet. Entranced by a mold of whitefish salad, I didn't realize that someone was talking to me. I didn't recognize him, and candidly I don't know that I'd know him if I fell over him today, but in that dazed moment of emotional turmoil and culinary overload I acknowledged his presence and his voice came into aural focus.
"You must be the kid from California," he said.
"Yes," I nodded, while swallowing some cheese blintz.
Moment of awkward silence and then, "So I hear you work in television."
Another seemingly epic pause.
I recall nodding. I must have because he launched into talking. Since my personal audio channel seemed jammed with a constant hiss of static, I was having a hard time hearing him. So I kept gamely munching at a bagel offering an occasional smile.
Then he said something that caught my attention.
" ... how are things?"
The reception for this station was now crystal clear.
"I beg your pardon?" I asked. I was sure that I had misheard him, because he couldn't possibly be asking me some version of "What's up?"
I was wrong.
"Well, you know, other than this (gesturing around at the mourners throughout the house) how are things in your life?"
Let it never be said that I am nothing if not quick on my feet.
"Is that like saying 'Other than that, Mrs Lincoln, how was the play?"
A third monumental chasm of silence ... and then came the tidal wave. The laughter started with a snort. I think someone may have choked on some coffee. A jerky chain reaction of laughter ensued, and while the chuckles rose and fell, I wandered away; but the phrase stayed with me ... other than that ... It stayed with me that whole week, during my flight home and well into the days that followed my return ... other than that.
Suddenly I heard it everywhere ... come on ... you hear it too. You've probably said it yourself at least once today ... and no matter where I go, there's one thing I remember.
The image of a beverage shooting out of someone's nose.
Your engines are racing, your gaze sharp and your heart thumping.
Then an incredible, almost erotic tingle begins. For some it starts in the extremities. For others it emerges as a deep vibration from the core.
It's delicious and seductive this feeling, but it feels dangerous. Do you give in? Do you pull back? The feeling continues to rise, the sensation growing stronger ... You're at the brink ...
... and all you're facing is a decision between grande or venti.
Okay, so perhaps the sane (translation - polite, socially conscious folks) of us don't exactly snap to this level of heightened reaction in such situations; but then again, the sane of us also tend to wait our turn in line and not get bent out of shape over such silly things.
That sensation of fight or flight comes in many flavors, and it seems to me that in today's break-neck, Mach 3 resting state kind of world, we've become so desensitized to it, that existing in that tightly wound state has become status quo.
The problem with making this solid state of high octane living your baseline is that it renders you immune to other moments of adrenaline rush. Kind of like drugs. Do one drug long enough and you build a tolerance, which means you must do more of the drug to induce the same type of high, which means you continue taking more and more and more ...
Well, you get the picture.
As for me, I'm glad to report that apart from the occasional regression, I've pretty much left the shaking-my-fist-flipping-off-leaning-on-horn-fuck-off behavior in some of the old life baggage cast off in the last emotional port of call.
But recently I realized that my detox process wasn't nearly done.
My epiphany hit in yoga class.
The instructor was leading us through a basic vinyasa, talking through each asana. As we settled into each pose, she would talk us through the proper alignments, explaining the delicate balances we sought to attain. For every minute muscle manipulation, for every gentle skeletal adjustment was a direct, opposite move. The trick - achieving balance between the two.
So there I was, deeply engaged in Paschimottanasana - also known as a forward bend - struggling with the always-present tension that seems to cluster in my right hip.
"Breathe," murmured the teacher. "Focus on your upper leg, rotating gently inward. Make the rotation from the hip. You should feel an opening in your sacral area. Go deeper. Breathe."
Now, I don't know if you do yoga, but when you're upright and hinged at the waist with your torso hanging upside down, focusing on anything other than the blood that's rushing to your head is a welcome activity.
I have no idea whether or not I was rotating anything, but slowly I began to feel a release in my lower back. It was as if that pesky sacral band the teacher mentioned had just heaved a huge sigh of relief.
If you're familiar with the Broadway musical A Chorus Line you may remember that song "Nothing". If you're not, then click on that link I just put there and take a listen - though please don't think that I'm endorsing this particular singer. Frankly, she sucks, but at least you'll hear the lyrics and can join the rest of the gang with my story here ...
Anyway to my point ... that song is about this Puerto Rican actress who finds herself unable to experience the feelings that her classmates seemed to so easily emote. This had been me in yoga. I'm a pretty athletic sort and moderately flexible so I was fine in terms of being able to physically handle the class, but for the most part the spiritual balance and synchronicity stuff had been eluding me.
Until now.
With that deep yawn and release in my lower back I could actually feel a connection to something bigger - a sort of greater energy that generated peace and relaxation while simultaneously energizing and stimulating me.
In that moment, all those tense moments of fight or flight melted away. There was no need to stand on guard. Suddenly, I was at peace.
"Hooray, I've managed to reach some sort of yoga breakthrough," I thought. Of course, acknowledging this state brought my consciousness back into focus, and when my mind realized what had happened, the muscles snapped back into place - more taut than a guitar string - and boom - I went down like a bag of bricks.
The moral of the story?
Not sure there is one except maybe to make sure that when you buy a yoga mat that you make sure it's nice and thick so that if you fall over you have something to cushion the blow.
I've been told I'm a rather persuasive person. I guess that's true, but I'm a bit worried because it seems that I may have willed a truly ridiculous piece of verbiage into existence.
When I talked about finding home (It Is What It Is - 2/20/2005), I poked gentle fun at the corporate citizens among whom I spend my time every day. Specifically I noted the rather irritating and all-too-familiar tendency of people in the business world to make up words. Nouns become verbs. Verbs become nouns. It was in this discussion I tossed out the word "templatized". Never did I think that such a horrific mangling of verbiage would actually see the dim light of a conference room.
The location was a conference room at a company that shall remain nameless where I and two of my colleagues were arranging ourselves in preparation for a new business meeting. It was to be a rather low-key meeting, more of a meet and greet sort of situation.
We were about 1/3 of the way into things, we'd given a brief overview of our respective skills and were at the part where the prospective client was doing their own little song & dance about their business.
That's when he said it. Templatized.
Perhaps I was hearing things. After all, I had just returned from a whirlwind trip to the East Coast and was tangling with the early stages of a rather nasty flu-like-sniffly-sneezy-coughy-wheezy sort of affliction. This damn meeting was the only reason I hauled my carcass out of bed, and as I sat there feeling distinctly like Typhoid Mary I heard the word.
Templatized.
I began to chuckle, figuring that he had to be kidding.
He wasn't.
Thankfully one of my monster sneezing fits struck at that very moment, so I could disguise my snorting chortle under the protective custody of several tissues.
Somehow blowing my nose at that moment seemed terribly appropriate.
Even the way the words feel in my mouth ... All things happen for a reason ... it's a bit like putting one too many graham crackers in your mouth without having the requisite ice cold milk chaser. It's a chewy phrase, and one that has quite a following. A straight-up Google hunt for "all things happen for a reason" leads to pages and pages and pages of ... well ... here's an example:
All things happen for a reason ... I'm thinking that the lesson for this guy is that he needs to learn to drive. It seems, however, that he has chosen to look at this as a bigger message from a higher source. That he's on this planet to do something big and therefore disaster has been averted so that he can fulfill his destiny.
And then there is that ridiculous woman from Georgia who sent her family into panic and an entire town into chaos because she couldn't face up to getting married. It wasn't bad enough that she took off and in doing so set into motion a massive manhunt, she then had to call and make up some crazy story about being kidnapped. All things happen for a reason. My take on this one? The reason is simple. This woman is an irresponsible idiot who needs to be smacked upside the head with the clue stick. After she's been forced to pay restitution for the costs incurred, and perhaps done a little jail time.
(Amendment to this posting - dated June 2, 2005 - justice has been served in this case, though perhaps not dealt as harshly as it should have been.)
Don't get me wrong here. I do believe that there is a grander scheme to things. I do believe that every single person on this earth has some purpose - a lesson to learn, a lesson to teach, or as is more often the case, both. It's just that this saying "all things happen for a reason" is overused and I believe that too many people use it as a way to absolve themselves of guilt. After all, if the outcome is preordained, they're just pawns in a oversized chess game.
That's a load of crap.
Sure there's a purpose for each of us, but we also got this lovely little bonus gift (better than than a Ginzu knife)when we landed into this particular existence.
It's called free will.
It's free will that permits us to experience any range of situations - from joyous to grief-laden - and absorb the lessons. We have a choice in how we deal with the lessons we're given. Of cousre, life being what it is, this same free will also creates a rather gaping loophole.
Once we have absorbed the lessons it is once again free will that lets us decide whether or not we will learn from the experience, and whether or not we will move onward and upward from there.
In January 2001, something terrible happened in my neighborhood. I can guarantee you heard about it. A 33-year-old woman, just coming back to her apartment with groceries, was brutally - and fatally - mauled by her neighbor's two dogs.
I never met Diane Whipple, but what happened to her could have happened to me. Literally.
As a dog "parent", and someone who spends much of my time out and about in San Francisco with my trusty furball sidekick, the idea that a dog could do such a thing horrified me.
What horrified me more was learning that I had actually encountered these animals, and had things gone differently, I could have suffered a similar fate.
I've been having a hell of a time getting started on this site.
You'd think someone whose first grade nickname was Chatty Cathy Doll (alternated with Babbling Brooks)would find churning out content to be second nature.
At first I thought it was merely a bad case of procrastination. Of course, it took me quite a while to determine it wasn't - mostly because I kept putting off sitting down and thinking about it.
Now that I've finally gotten around to it, I see that the truth is simple.
Anyone who knows me will quickly agree that Cathy Brooks is someone who speaks her mind - sometimes to a fault. Where most people have a fine-mesh filter that strains their thoughts before speaking, I have more of a colander. Bigger holes.
Seeing as the whole reason I've embarked on doing this site is to provide a place for open discourse and honest conversation, there could be really only one reason for my hesitation.
I care what other people think about me.
Oh come on. So do you.
Most folks don't like to admit it, but deep down the very idea of baring the honest truth scares the ever-loving shit out of most everyone.
Thus my quandary.
I've had such a hard time spitting out my thoughts onto the Internet because I'm cursed with a chronic case of candor. I tend to have opinions - alot of them. I tend to say what I think, and I've been frozen at the keyboard with a deep terror that in staying true to my mission, that I'll piss people off.
So be it.
Consider this my formal disclaimer - I don't intent to defame, humiliate, shame, dishonor or otherwise smear anyone; but when speaking the honest truth, sometimes people's noses get bent out of joint.
In spite of all my best efforts to stay along that straight and narrow, I'm sure that in the course of expressing my thoughts and opinions and attempting to galvanize some open discourse, I'll piss someone off. I'll probably piss off alot of people.
So be it.
Let them say what they will. I'm happy to be proven wrong. I'm even happy to apologize if along the way I have a misperception that leads to insult.
If you don't like what I think, if you don't like what I write, that's your prerogative. If you're looking to toss down with me over it, you'll be looking for a long time.
If it's a fight you want, go nag Bill O'Reilly. I'm sure that self-absorbed, pig-headed dolt would be happy to take you on.
It's funny. Sometimes we do things in life that don't have any rhyme or reason at the time, and later it hits you like a beam of light - in my case a rather heavy 2X4 of oak thunking me upside the head.
Like this revelation I had the other day. Well, the other day a couple of years ago, but I wasn't writing this Web site then.
In any event, when I first moved out West in June of 1990, it was because I'd never been to California and always wanted to check it out.
That, and every newspaper to which I applied up and down the Eastern seaboard rejected my applications outright. They sent me very nice letters, and in a couple of cases there were even clear efforts to personalize what was otherwize a templatized missive.
(Lest you think I've succumbed to that deadly corporate disease - Corpus Verbnounsis - the lethal tendency to turn nouns into verbs - allow me to explain. 'Templatized' is not actually a word. I made it up, and unfortunately you may likely see some moron use it in a business presentation. That sad soul, of course, will be in the final stages of debilitating Verbnounsis, and will need to be medicated. Heavily.)
Now where was I? Oh yes. My deluge of "thanks but no thanks" letters. I wouldn't say that I have ever taken the punch of rejection well. I would, however, say that I have always been adept at glancing off the blows - at least enough so that I can identify a new approach, a new path of action.
I was raised to believe in the "a door closes and a window opens" philosophy of life. I've also always held deep faith in the belief that there are critical life lessons in all things we do, and all experiences we have. From brushing our teeth in the morning to how we greet the first person we see, to how we do our jobs, to how we exist in relationships - everything we do provides something of value.
So when I came up empty on the East Coast, I looked at the other end of the map.
After being soundly rejected throughout the states of Washington and Oregon, I came to California.
The San Francisco Chronicle - no.
The San Jose Mercury News - no.
The Marin Independent Journal - no.
The Oakland Tribune - no.
The Peninsula Times-Tribune - YES!
Ten days after my college graduation I landed at San Francisco International Airport. It was June 26, 1990. 11:16AM Pacific Time.
After heaving my bags into the first Alamo rent-a-car shuttle that passed (tossing myself in immediately thereafter) it wasn't long before I was heading to my hotel. The sky was sharp, royal blue with the sun-baked hillside almost glowing in crisp contrast. I'd seen clear skies before. I'd seen nature before. Somehow, it felt as though I were seeing things for the first time. The air even smelled different. I took a deep whiff.
That's when it hit. The good old 2X4 came swinging out of nowhere and thunked me.
I used to have this friend. His name was Greg Levian. We met not too long after I moved to the San Francisco Bay Area. It was the summer of 1990, some time in June or July I think. All I know is that the ink was barely dry on the lease for my mold-infused cubbyhole of a studio in Mountain View.
Born and raised in the Main Line suburbs of Philadelphia, PA, I'd never been west of Chicago - not even to interview for the job that gave me the excuse to move here. To be honest, the excuse was a flimsy one, because the true reason for my 3,000 mile journey was simple. It's why many people upend their lives and drop blindy into the challenge of the unknown. I moved for a woman - a remarkable woman of great mystery and beauty.
(I know, I know. That was a cheap dramatic shot, but I couldn't resist. Though I should at this point apologize to my mother since it may have given her a heart attack.)
I digress ...
Greg and I met on one of my weekend trips into San Francisco from Mountain View. Every Sunday I would load the trunk of my car - snacks, several changes of clothes (if you're unfamiliar with San Francisco's famous micro-climates here a tip - if you ever come to SF, especially in the summer, travel with lots of layers of clothing!) - and I'd head for Golden Gate Park. Lacing up my Rollerblades (I was a proud early adopter of this trend), I'd tool around for hours.
Greg was a competitive speed skater. He had this trick where he'd go down the park's slalom course balanced precariously on the foremost wheel of each skate. These skates had five wheels on each "blade", and the balancing act turned this stocky speed skater into a lanky wheeled dancer - every sinewy tendon and sharply curved muscle standing in stark relief under his Lycra.
He wasn't just a showman, Greg was slicker than a greased watermelon on those wheels - a good quality in a professional speed skater. Unfortunately, speed skating isn't exactly a flush industry, and so Greg kept himself in top shape and expensive skate supplies by working as a messenger.
We had several regular routes, but our favorite was starting at the eastern end of the park. Heading due west for the beach was no big deal. It was largely down hil, making the return a slow slog upward. Though largely a gentle, almost imperceptible grade, there was one particularly nasty hill twoard the end that knocked the tar out of me every time. One day Greg came up to me as I crouched panting, having just rolled onto the grass by the side of the road at the crest of the hill.
He just stood there, and when I looked up at him, he smiled and asked, "Why do you give up just before you hit your stride?"
Being too winded to answer (and probably looking a bit like a fish slopping on a boat's deck gasping for air - without the flopping part), I shrugged and gestured for him to continue.
"You're looking at this hill the wrong way, Cathy," Greg continued. He went on to explain that instead of seeing the hill as a single peak I had to conquer, I should view it merely as one facet of a longer trek. So that reaching the top of this particular hill wasn't a goal, it was a milestone - just like life.
That day, all I could think about was getting past the pains in my chest to a place where I could breathe again. Now it's 14 years later and I think I understand what Greg meant. (Okay, so maybe I'm a bit slow on the uptake, but once I learn something it's locked and loaded.)
In looking at life as a finite race with a start and finish, you immediately limit yourself. Let's think of this like any sort of physical race where there's a starting line and finish line. You come out of the gate strong - hoping to set yourself well in the pack. You settle in, find your stride, and maintain a strong but comfortable pace for the long haul. Then, as you see that final marker approaching, you pull out the stops and fire off those reserve tanks to propel yourself over the finish line.
That may be fine for a race. It may even be fine for things like completing projects at work, around the house or reaching personal goals. It doesn't necessarily translate to the bigger picture. Especially since life isn't quite so cut and dry. It's true that there are time when people know when their race will be over. Disease or illness hits - BANG - and their time becomes measured. Sometimes it's a long-planted time bomb. For others it's dropped, often unceremoniously, on the noggin'. Most of us, though, don't have the luxury, if you can call it that, of knowing how long our race will be.
It doesn't really matter though. The idea of shooting off those reserve tanks in anticipation of breaking the tape at the end of the finish isn't a healthy way to view life. It's not that you should behave as if you're not going to die, but it sure doesn't hurt to pace yourself with the plan to take life as a marathon rather than the 50-yard dash. During that race there will be moments where you might feel yourself slipping behind or losing motivation. It's in those moments where you unfurl your legs, take a deep breath, and allow some of that deep energy from your core to radiate out to your limbs. The trick is not to use it all at once.
There's that moderation thing again.
I'm not sure why excatly, but all these years later I feel this lesson drop into place. Perhaps it's because I was cleaning out some cabinets and came across his picture.
I'd like to call Greg and thank him for the lesson - even if I was just a touch slow on the uptake; but I can't. Not long after I met him, Greg died hiking out at Land's End.
He wasn't doing anything crazy. He wasn't doing anything extreme. He just slipped. It was a foggy wet day, the rocks and path were slippery, and as he made his way back to his car after hiking with some friends, he lost his footing and fell to the rocks below.
I thought about Greg the other day when I found that picture. In it he's sitting in my old apartment out on 24th Avenue. He's wearing a t-shirt with the sleeves hacked off, tiger-striped Lycra tights ... and his skates.